|
|
In message <qvEeh.176874$Fi1.26072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I surmise based on what F provided is that the recipe
> given had to little clay and it was not activated and with
> no aggregate for strength, it would have been too weak to
> be formed into load bearing arches, ceilings, or overhanging
> walls.
Strong enough to support the weight of the Great Pyramid, but too weak for
load-bearing arches? Do I detect a contradiction here?
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
|
|