sci.archaeology
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Can we get a moderator?

Subject: Re: Can we get a moderator?
From: "Steve Marcus"
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 05:15:38 -0400
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:448D1159.CDA52E02@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Doug Weller wrote:
>>
>> On 7 Jun 2006 08:00:50 -0700, in sci.archaeology, celia wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Seppo Renfors wrote:
>> >> celia wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Seppo Renfors wrote:

<snip>

>
> Oh dear, I have stated Douggie is a fraud, habitual liar, resorts to
> using racism as a TOOL and invited the fraud to sue me, and I have
> even offered to write its statement of claim for the fool! IT RUNS
> AWAY instead bleating like a stuck pig, only to come back with the
> same BOGUS CRAP another day - THAT is why Douggie is a true FRAUD!
>
> Then there was this I said:
> Oh dear... the puppy farmer who has libelled real genuine scholars as
> Nazis or Nazi sympathisers pretends that TRUTH is "libel" now.

Naturally, we all have sufficient cause to believe _anything_  *you* post, 
don't we?

http://tinyurl.com/ywe7s

That tells us all we need to know about Shelpo the Clown, doesn't it?

Steve

-- 
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
<balance snipped>

The signature below is written by someone who has *never* read a *right* 
book.
>
> -- 
> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
> misled.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------- 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>