|Subject:||Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact|
|Date:||Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:03:40 +0200|
Erik Hammerstad wrote: news:4fgsn0F1i4volU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IE J wrote:------------------- end of Context for Hauksbok, summery of Hauksbok treated as an artifact. ----End of - if so, I'm truly grateful (for nothing really), but noting that you are not to be trusted - why should I care (I don't)?
Yes, four 'articles' hauksbok 'backgound' and 'context' and still nothing archaeological. -- p.a.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Answer to Erik H., IEJ|
|Next by Date:||Re: Answer to Erik H., Peter Alaca|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Answer to Erik H., Peter Alaca|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact, Peter Alaca|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|