| Subject: | Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact |
|---|---|
| From: | "Peter Alaca" |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:03:40 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.archaeology, soc.history.medieval |
Erik Hammerstad wrote: news:4fgsn0F1i4volU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx IE J wrote:------------------- end of Context for Hauksbok, summery of Hauksbok treated as an artifact. ----End of - if so, I'm truly grateful (for nothing really), but noting that you are not to be trusted - why should I care (I don't)? Yes, four 'articles' hauksbok 'backgound' and 'context' and still nothing archaeological. -- p.a. |
| Previous by Date: | Answer to Erik H., IEJ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Answer to Erik H., Peter Alaca |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Answer to Erik H., Peter Alaca |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact, Peter Alaca |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |