Dylan Sung wrote: news:e70a13$pnh$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Peter Alaca" wrote
IE J wrote: news:
HAUKSBOK CODEX ARNAMAGNAEANUS 544.4 O to
Codex Arnamagnaeanus 544.4 O to, was returned to Iceland where it at
present is to be found in The Árni Magnússon Institute, Reykjavik.
------------------- end of Context for Hauksbok, summery of Hauksbok
treated as an artifact. ----
© Johansson Inger E, Hauksbok treated as an artifact, summery from
article Gothenburg 2006
As an aid to the reader I posted two days ago
a long quote from Vésteinn Ólason, with almost
all of this. And it is much shorter and better than
Why does she keep putting the copyright symbol after her summaries?
It seems like an excercise in notetaking to me, and of no real use to
anyone except herself.
She is a poor soul. It is copied all over the internet and
nobody is interested to put his own name under it.
Wouldn't reading the full original be more helpful to those who
want to know?
I don't know. Even this summaries are long,
unreadable, boring and faulty, so what do
you expect from the original?