| Subject: | Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact |
|---|---|
| From: | "Peter Alaca" |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:00:23 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.archaeology, soc.history.medieval |
Dylan Sung wrote: news:e761pe$t27$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"prd" wrote"Dylan Sung" . : Why does she keep putting the copyright symbol after her summaries?Is it not apparent there is no shortfalling of chiropterans within her cranial vault? What's lost is now found: http://tinyurl.com/ndy4o I like the double negative. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pitman still arguing for a 6th millenniumBCE Black Sea Flood, Bobby D. Bryant |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: To Inger, AM 544 4to is still in Copenhagen, Peter Alaca |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact, prd |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Context for Hauksbok, re Hauksbok treated as an artifact, Peter Alaca |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |