Re: biblical languages Re: A question...

[Martin Edwards]

Matt Giwer wrote:
> Martin Edwards wrote:
>
> > Matt Giwer wrote:
> >
> > >     Now that even the most ardent believers have agreed upon a 6th or 
> > > 7th c. BC creation they still see things written in styles older than 
> > > that time where everything should be style of the time of creation. 
> > > So if the creation time known then the variations are based upon 
> > > locale not age. This same can be applied to any creation date.
>
>
> > Nope, on refelction I think you are wrong here, but
> > /it was worth bringing up/.
>
>
>     It is an attempt at creating the simplest explanation for the facts.
>
>     There are facts which must be accounted for in any explanation.

Mr Daniel's post on the Hebrew swung it for me.  As I don't know Hebrew 
I take his word for it.  That is my decision on the basis of 
probability.  I do not say that the arguments you reiterate are without 
validity.

--
You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause - Chico Marx

www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955