| Subject: | Re: biblical languages Re: A question... |
|---|---|
| From: | Martin Edwards |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:16:33 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.archaeology, sci.lang, soc.history.ancient |
Ruud Harmsen wrote: The Wikipedia is open source. Especially where Christianity is concerned, it is likely to contain material the contributors have been taught, not based on research.Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:37:45 GMT: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:2 The first mention of these people, stories and events appears in the Greek Septuagint. There is no mention of anything in it found in any other source prior to it.BTW, the German wikipedia at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgata says that the Vulgate was translated by Jerome, who "wandte sich ab 390 der Übersetzung des Alten Testaments zu – nicht wie die meisten anderen frühchristlichen Bibelübersetzungen aus der griechischen Septuaginta, sondern unter Benutzung des hebräischen Urtexts." What were those those Hebrew originals if the Mishnaic texts were finalized around 1000 AD, and the Dead Scrolls were discovered in 1947? -- You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause - Chico Marx www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: biblical languages Re: A question..., Martin Edwards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: less, Martin Edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: less, Martin Edwards |
| Next by Thread: | Re: biblical languages Re: A question..., Ruud Harmsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |