Doctor Baldric, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/27

• Re: Doctor Baldric, celia, 2006/02/28
  • Re: Doctor Baldric, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Doctor Baldric, Andrew Chaplin, 2006/02/28

Re: A question..., Hayabusa, 2006/02/27

• Re: A question..., Matt Giwer, 2006/02/28

bronze age weapons, Hayabusa, 2006/02/26

• Re: bronze age weapons, Day Brown, 2006/02/27
  • Re: bronze age weapons, Doug Weller, 2006/02/27
    • Re: bronze age weapons, Day Brown, 2006/02/28
    • Re: bronze age weapons, Doug Weller, 2006/02/28
• Re: bronze age weapons, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/27
  • Re: bronze age weapons, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/27
    • Re: bronze age weapons, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/28
  • Re: bronze age weapons, Hayabusa, 2006/02/27
    • Re: bronze age weapons, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/28
• Re: bronze age weapons, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/27
  • Re: bronze age weapons, Hayabusa, 2006/02/27
    • Re: bronze age weapons, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/28

Re: The United States Of Earth, prd, 2006/02/24

• Re: The United States Of Earth, Thomas Zahr, 2006/02/25

Scientist Claim Neandertal/Human Overlap Earlier and Shorter than previously thought., prd, 2006/02/23

• Re: Scientist Claim Neandertal/Human Overlap Earlier and Shorter than previously thought., bernard, 2006/02/23
  • Re: Scientist Claim Neandertal/Human Overlap Earlier and Shorter than previously thought., johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Scientist Claim Neandertal/Human Overlap Earlier and Shorter than previously thought., bernard, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Scientist Claim Neandertal/Human Overlap Earlier and Shorter than previously thought., Dar Habel, 2006/02/24

Alternative Archaeology, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/23

• Re: Alternative Archaeology, prd, 2006/02/23
  • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/23
• Re: Alternative Archaeology, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/23
  • Re: Alternative Archaeology, George, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/24
  • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/24
• Re: Alternative Archaeology, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/23
  • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/24
  • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/25
    • Re: Alternative Archaeology, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/25

Templar William St Clair killed in Lithuania, IE J, 2006/02/22

• Re: Templar William St Clair killed in Lithuania, bernard, 2006/02/22
  • Re: Templar William St Clair killed in Lithuania, IE J, 2006/02/22
  • Re: Templar William St Clair killed in Lithuania, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/23

Ancient clockwork, Dave Gee, 2006/02/22

• Re: Ancient clockwork, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/22
• Re: Ancient clockwork, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/22
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ancient clockwork, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ancient clockwork, hagen, 2006/02/27

DNA and early agriculture, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/22

• Re: DNA and early agriculture, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/23

arte, Jean, 2006/02/19

• Re: arte, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/19

Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/19

• Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/19
  • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, prd, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, prd, 2006/02/23
• Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/19
  • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, bogart . lloy, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/19
  • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, IE J, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/20
• Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Verendryes between Pierre and Pincher: Request for Submissions, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/20

Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16

• Re: Smiling Vinkings, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/16
  • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/17
  • Re: Smiling Vinkings, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/17
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/17
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
• Re: Smiling Vinkings, JerryT, 2006/02/16
  • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, JerryT, 2006/02/16
• Re: Smiling Vinkings, Steve Marcus, 2006/02/16
  • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Steve Marcus, 2006/02/17
• Re: Smiling Vinkings, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/17
  • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Smiling Vinkings, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/18

OT mathematical theory problem(s), Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/15

• Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), PaulB, 2006/02/16
  • Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/16
    • Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), prd, 2006/02/17
    • Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/17
    • Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), prd, 2006/02/17
• Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), prd, 2006/02/16
• Re: OT mathematical theory problem(s), Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/16

Queen Bianca and the Templars., IE J, 2006/02/15

• Re: Queen Bianca and the Templars., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/15
  • Re: Queen Bianca and the Templars., IE J, 2006/02/15
• Re: Queen Bianca and the Templars., Derek Lockman, 2006/02/20
• Re: Queen Bianca and the Templars., shannonkilbourne70, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Queen Bianca and the Templars., IE J, 2006/02/20

dinosaur eggs, coribud, 2006/02/14

• Re: dinosaur eggs, bernard, 2006/02/14
• Re: dinosaur eggs, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/14
  • Re: dinosaur eggs, George, 2006/02/14

Re: Biblical Geology was: Yes, the Earth is Expanding! - Nexus Magazine article, bogart . lloy, 2006/02/13

• Re: Biblical Geology was: Yes, the Earth is Expanding! - Nexus Magazine article, David Johnson, 2006/02/13

Seeking biographical information on California archaeolgist Samuel Hubbard, barthome1, 2006/02/13

• Re: Seeking biographical information on California archaeolgist Samuel Hubbard, dougweller@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/19

Scandinavian Inscription?, Yitzhak Sapir, 2006/02/13

• Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, barthome1, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, Yitzhak Sapir, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, JerryT, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, JerryT, 2006/02/14
  • Re: Scandinavian Inscription?, JerryT, 2006/02/14

Archaeological evidence for British food plants, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13

• Re: Archaeological evidence for British food plants, prd, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Archaeological evidence for British food plants, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Archaeological evidence for British food plants, prd, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Archaeological evidence for British food plants, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/14

Neolithic Cheese and Yogurt, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12

• Re: Neolithic Cheese and Yogurt, Hayabusa, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Neolithic Cheese and Yogurt, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13

New findings in Egypt, IE J, 2006/02/11

• Re: New findings in Egypt, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
  • Re: New findings in Egypt, IE J, 2006/02/11
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, IE J, 2006/02/12
  • Message not available
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, joerevskelton, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, bogart . lloy, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Doug Weller, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, lorad474, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Peter Jason, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, prd, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, RodneyK, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, deowll, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, kenney, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Peter Jason, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Peter Jason, 2006/02/14
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, prd, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/16
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Peter Jason, 2006/02/16
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/16
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Peter Jason, 2006/02/16
  • Message not available
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/12
• Re: New findings in Egypt, gnenian, 2006/02/11
• Re: New findings in Egypt, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/12
  • Re: New findings in Egypt, Martin Edwards, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/12
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Martin Edwards, 2006/02/13
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, deowll, 2006/02/15
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/16
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, deowll, 2006/02/17
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/17
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, deowll, 2006/02/18
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Kendall K . Down, 2006/02/18
    • Re: New findings in Egypt, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/17
• Re: New findings in Egypt, rick++, 2006/02/12
  • Re: New findings in Egypt, IE J, 2006/02/12

Bronze Age bouquet, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11

• Re: Bronze Age bouquet, lorad474, 2006/02/12

Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/11

• Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/11
  • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/11
  • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/11
• Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/11
• Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/11
• Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11
  • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., hyperoglyphe, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/13
    • Message not available
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/12
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Soren Larsen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., kenney, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Steve Marcus, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Steve Marcus, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Lisbeth Andersson, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Steve Marcus, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Steve Marcus, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/23
    • KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/23
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/24
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/24
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/24
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Andrew Chaplin, 2006/02/24
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/25
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/28
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/28
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/28
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/28
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/28
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/24
    • Re: KRS and the Templars former Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/24
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/27
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Doug Weller, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/28
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Philip Deitiker, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., kenney, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/18
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Vaughan Sanders, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Vaughan Sanders, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, kenney, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, erilar, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, kenney, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, kenney, 2006/02/24
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/26
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/26
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Steve Marcus, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Steve Marcus, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, erilar, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, erilar, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/27
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, Tron, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die/Long and Speculative, am05, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., kenney, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/19
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., k.r.hauge@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., k.r.hauge@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Message not available
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Message not available
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., joerevskelton, 2006/02/21
    • answer to joerevskelton, IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • answer to Peter Alaca, IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Ian Dalziel, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Ian Dalziel, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/23
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Ian Dalziel, 2006/02/23
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Andrew Chaplin, 2006/02/23
    • Re: answer to Peter Alaca, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., erilar, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Searles O'Dubhain, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Searles O'Dubhain, 2006/02/23
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Message not available
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., k.r.hauge@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Soren Larsen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/22
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., JerryT, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Tron, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/17
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Uwe Müller, 2006/02/20
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., prd, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Soren Larsen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., kenney, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., am05, 2006/02/15
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Peter Alaca, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Erik Hammerstad, 2006/02/13
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Alan Crozier, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., IE J, 2006/02/14
    • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/13
  • Re: (some) Old Templars do not die: they simply fade away., Eric Stevens, 2006/02/11

Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/09

• Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/09
  • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Hal, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, kenney, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Lee Olsen, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tedd Jacobs, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Lee Olsen, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/16
  • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, joerevskelton, 2006/02/09
• Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, joerevskelton, 2006/02/09
• Message not available
  • Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/09
• Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, prd, 2006/02/09
• Re: Pre-historic trails in eastern North Dakota?, lorad474, 2006/02/12

Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/08

• Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, prd, 2006/02/09
• Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/09
  • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/10
  • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Hayabusa, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/10
• Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, dhobraasch, 2006/02/10
  • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, dhobraasch, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/11
  • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, Hayabusa, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bronze Age Longhouses, dhobraasch, 2006/02/12

Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/08

• Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Tom McDonald, 2006/02/08
  • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Peter Alaca, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Eric Stevens, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Peter Alaca, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Eric Stevens, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Peter Alaca, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Eric Stevens, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Tom McDonald, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Peter Alaca, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), Doug Weller, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Biblio Technology (was Peer Reveiw), David B., 2006/02/09

Deadly knee, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/07

• Re: Deadly knee, Inger E, 2006/02/07
  • Re: Deadly knee, grapheus, 2006/02/07
    • Re: Deadly knee, Inger E, 2006/02/07
  • Re: Deadly knee, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/07
    • Re: Deadly knee, Inger E, 2006/02/07

Mesolithic - Death & Burial, markeybran, 2006/02/06

• Re: Mesolithic - Death & Burial, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/11

Earliest Iron production, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/06

• Re: Earliest Iron production, Italo, 2006/02/08
  • Re: Earliest Iron production, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/09

The Celts in the Iberian Peninsula [was e-Keltoi], Peter Alaca, 2006/02/05

• Re: The Celts in the Iberian Peninsula [was e-Keltoi], Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/05

Milk and early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/04

• Re: Milk and early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Milk and early Germans, Doug Weller, 2006/02/04
• Re: Milk and early Germans, Doug Weller, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Milk and early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/04
• Re: Milk and early Germans, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/06
  • Re: Milk and early Germans, dhobraasch, 2006/02/07
    • Re: Milk and early Germans, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Milk and early Germans, dhobraasch, 2006/02/08
    • Re: Milk and early Germans, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Milk and early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/09
• Re: Milk and early Germans, lorad474, 2006/02/12
• Re: Milk and early Germans, zutalors212, 2006/02/14

KRS: A Blog from the Heartland (was) Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters., t(nospam)kavanagh, 2006/02/04

• Re: A Blog from the Heartland (was) Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters., Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/04
• Re: KRS: A Blog from the Heartland (was) Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters., prd, 2006/02/04
• Re: KRS: A Blog from the Heartland (was) Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters., Tom McDonald, 2006/02/04

The Early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03

• Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/03
  • Re: The Early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03
  • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/04
    • Re: The Early Germans, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/04
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hal, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, prd, 2006/02/05
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, kenney, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, lorad474, 2006/02/25
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/25
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Inger E, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/09
    • Pelasgians, Hayabusa, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, Hayabusa, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Pelasgians, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/11
    • Message not available
    • Re: Pelasgians, grapheus, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Pelasgians, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/13
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Italo, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Italo, 2006/02/10
    • Re: The Early Germans, Italo, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, kenney, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Italo, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, prd, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Italo, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/10
    • Re: The Early Germans, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/08
    • Re: The Early Germans, Soren Larsen, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/09
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/06
    • Re: The Early Germans, Hayabusa, 2006/02/07
    • Re: The Early Germans, o8TY, 2006/02/20
    • Re: The Early Germans, Andrew Dalby, 2006/02/20
    • Re: The Early Germans, o8TY, 2006/02/21
    • Re: The Early Germans, Andrew Dalby, 2006/02/26
    • Re: The Early Germans, o8TY, 2006/02/05

Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03

• Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, prd, 2006/02/04
• Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Hayabusa, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/05
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/05
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/05
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/05
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, prd, 2006/02/06
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/06
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Hayabusa, 2006/02/06
    • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Hayabusa, 2006/02/05
  • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, GNENIAN, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Michael Kuettner, 2006/02/04
• Re: Was Oetzi killed by his wife?, Daryl Krupa, 2006/02/05

Earliest farmers in central Europe, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/03

• Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Bobby D. Bryant, 2006/02/03
  • Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/04
• Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/04
• Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, prd, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/06
• Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, prd, 2006/02/04
  • Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Uwe Müller, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, prd, 2006/02/05
    • Re: Earliest farmers in central Europe, Seppo Renfors, 2006/02/06

Re: Lascaux, a lunisolar calendar, Franz Gnaedinger, 2006/02/03

• Re: Lascaux, a lunisolar calendar, Franz Gnaedinger, 2006/02/08

Re: Just a new formulation, hagen, 2006/02/02

• Re: Just a new formulation, grapheus, 2006/02/02
  • Re: Just a new formulation, hagen, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Just a new formulation, grapheus, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Just a new formulation, hagen, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Just a new formulation, hagen, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Just a new formulation, grapheus, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Just a new formulation, grapheus, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Just a new formulation, hagen, 2006/02/15

Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/02

• Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/02
  • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/02
• Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/02
  • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/02
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/02
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/02
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, George, 2006/02/02
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Tom McDonald, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, bernard, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/04
    • Message not available
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/04
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Eric Stevens, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/03
    • Re: Clams before Columbus, Inger E.Johansson, 2006/02/03
  • Re: Clams before Columbus, Alan Crozier, 2006/02/02
• Re: Clams before Columbus, Peter Alaca, 2006/02/03
• Re: Clams before Columbus, prd, 2006/02/03
  • Re: Clams before Columbus, Seppo Renfors