sci.archaeology
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone

Subject: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
From: Philip Deitiker
Date: 9 Aug 2005 16:31:53 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, soc.culture.nordic, soc.history.medieval
In sci.archaeology,          Alaca created a message ID 
news:42f8cf13$0$31222$dbd41001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> BTW, Did you know there is an Indian tribe
> living near Inger?

Who is to say what is "near" in the mental space time 
continuoum? I know for fact, it is a truth widely regarded 
amoung all First and Final Nations, if near is nare, then here 
or hare hath hair not. And by scapler's raised fear, simply fair 
it is not. For if ones near to nare and thus has no hair, the 
scapler lear by glare, blinded is fair by final or by first he 
dares not. And the sayer for this, if he is nay, then let him 
pray because the nare works not and the scapler will dare, he 
will still loose his hair, it was better for him to just yea his 
nod. Therefore if a place has alot of men balding, then likely 
the first will agree, to stay just close by, well off to the 
side, not daring final or saying nare a bo-peep. Is this clear?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>