| Subject: | Re: Kensington Runestone Wikipedia 28th July 2005 |
|---|---|
| From: | Eric Stevens |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:52:39 +1200 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.archaeology, soc.culture.nordic, soc.history.medieval |
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:18:29 +0100, Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> In other words I have sent you and the others direct instruction which >>> edited book to look up in, including chapter and page, to read about some of >>> the confirmed(!!!!) artifacts. >> >> >>Confirmed ? Bullshit is more like it. >> > >Arlington Mallery, I'd almost put money on it. And as you say, not >confirmed And in some cases shown to be wrong in that at least one of his smelters has turned out to be colonial rather than pre-Columbian. Eric Stevens |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone, Eric Stevens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kensington Runestone Wikipedia 28th July 2005, t(nospam)kavanagh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kensington Runestone Wikipedia 28th July 2005, Doug Weller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kensington Runestone Wikipedia 28th July 2005, Philip Deitiker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |