sci.archaeology
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Big Roman Dig Latest News

Subject: Re: Big Roman Dig Latest News
From: "deowll"
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:47:48 -0500
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, soc.history.ancient
"IEJ" <Inger_ejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:Lr2Ae.28880$d5.182018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:X22Ae.45838$qm.3125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:42d06813$0$69080$dbd49001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > IEJ wrote:  WoZze.141782$dP1.494952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > faded a bit.
>> >>
>> >> I have been thinking about a 'detail' question, maybe not important,
>> >> but here it goes: did the Roman wear any kind of socks in cold
>> >> climate ...
>> >
>> > No and, more excitingly, no pants.
>> > But they had very long johns.
>> > Was that the 'detail' you was thinking about?
>> >
>> They wore socks up near Hadrians wall. They've got some of the socks and
>> they've got letters about socks.
>
> Now to the detail. or small details. What was the socks made of and how 
> did
> they keep them clean (and soft) enough not to caught (gall-)sores? If one
> today walk over long distances each and other hour one need to make
> arrangements, change socks clean feet etc etc. Otherwise the long walk in
> the end would be a pain. But how did the Romans prevent that? Never read
> anything about those details.
>
> Inger E
>>
> <snip>
>
There were permanent encampments with buildings. I'm not sure the article 
said what they were made of but my guess is wool or wool with a little linen 
of the sort used in frontier America. As for washing they would have done it 
themselves or hired somebody to do it or maybe a wife, lover, or slave would 
have done it. They weren't supposed to marry but it doesn't seem to have 
been much of a secret that many had females off base. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>