> In sci.anthropology.paleo message
> news:1135750138.717100.163630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by "Jim
> McGinn" <jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxx> . . . :
> > The one thing though. I'm trying to figure out what actual
> > number X is. Maybe you can help us out here, Philster. What is
> > X? How many of you are there? Can you give me a number? Rough
> > estimate? Wild guess?
> > Anything? C'mon Phil. Can you help me out here?
> X is a number larger than the number of properly functioning neurons
> inside your skull cap.
By golly. I figured you'd answer as such.
> I think its time I killfiled you so the group can go back discussion
> wishy washy ape theories (other than the capitalistic diving from
> trees ape theory you prop
Go ahead. Stick your head in the sand. (I honesty don't blame you.)
You are, afterall, the champion of killfiles. One can only wonder why
you haven't killfiled me before this moment. Why, by golly, I suddenly
realized that since you are going to killfile me after this point that,
therefore, this is the last opportunity that I have to communicate
wiith your Texan ass. You're a jackass. There, I feel better already.