|
|
"Philip Deitiker" <Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns971E83D14EF17prd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In sci.anthropology.paleo, G Horvat created a message
> ID news:a5oro11fpdv1phrs7ftncuh9ki16mrq308@xxxxxxx:
>
> > On 30 Nov 2005 16:07:51 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>In sci.anthropology.paleo, Philip Deitiker created
> a
> >>message ID news:Xns971E66CE44C4Eprd@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
> >>
[snip]
> They must not have seen or be aware of
>
[snip]
> http://www.chinapage.com/archeology/Liujiang.htm
Note: "congenitally absent third molars" Something I have read about in
connection with the Europeans, a benefit when skull size is decreasing.
[snip]
I found this curious, too: "Low, rectangular orbits are common in the Late
Pleistocene and early Holocene throughout the world and this should be
disregarded when determining East Asian affinity." Aren't "rounded orbits"
the orbits of choice in Europeans?
JOOis
|
|