Fat Cat!! Lorenzo watch out!!, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30

• Re: Fat Cat!! Lorenzo watch out!!, Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/30
  • Re: Fat Cat!! Lorenzo watch out!!, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30

South Amerindian craniofacial morphology, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30

• Re: South Amerindian craniofacial morphology, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30
  • Re: South Amerindian craniofacial morphology, G Horvat, 2005/11/30
    • Re: South Amerindian craniofacial morphology, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30
• Re: South Amerindian craniofacial morphology, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/30

Another example or Male/Female origin bias, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/29

• Re: Another example or Male/Female origin bias, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/30

Delayed maturation of females in Senegal, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/29

• Re: Delayed maturation of females in Senegal, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/29
• Re: Delayed maturation of females in Senegal, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/29

Absence of Canines in Apiths, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/28

• Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/30
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/30
    • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/30
    • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/30
    • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths, mclark, 2005/11/30

Please don't feed Richard Dwarfkins, spiznet, 2005/11/27

• Re: Please don't feed Richard Dwarfkins, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/28
• Re: Please don't feed Richard Dwarfkins, Flakey714, 2005/11/28

Re: Invisible Pink Unicorns, Santa Claus and God, osteo, 2005/11/27

• Re: Invisible Pink Unicorns, Santa Claus and God, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/27

Miracle of life: Ice-Age babies, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26

• Re: Miracle of life: Ice-Age babies, Jois, 2005/11/27

A bone in the theories of the evolution, the sphénoïde!, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26

• Re: A bone in the theories of the evolution, the sphénoïde!, Jois, 2005/11/26

forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/25

• NORTH AMERICAN SITE OVER 100KYA???? Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/26
  • Re: NORTH AMERICAN SITE OVER 100KYA???? Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/26
• Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, deowll, 2005/11/27
  • Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/27
    • Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
    • Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/28
    • Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, deowll, 2005/11/29
• Re: forward: Ancient tools at High Desert site go back 135,000 years, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/30

_Human Evolutionary Genetics_, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/25

• Re: _Human Evolutionary Genetics_, Jois, 2005/11/26
  • Re: _Human Evolutionary Genetics_, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/27

Vestigial tree-climbing traits, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/24

• Re: Vestigial tree-climbing traits, deowll, 2005/11/27
• Vestigial tree-climbing traits, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Vestigial tree-climbing traits, JAE, 2005/11/24

Amazon.com: Strange Creations: Aberrant Ideas of Human Origins from Ancient Astronauts to Aquatic Apes: Books: Donna Kossy, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/24

• Re: Amazon.com: Strange Creations: Aberrant Ideas of Human Origins from Ancient Astronauts to Aquatic Apes: Books: Donna Kossy, spiznet, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Amazon.com: Strange Creations: Aberrant Ideas of Human Origins from Ancient Astronauts to Aquatic Apes: Books: Donna Kossy, Jois, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Amazon.com: Strange Creations: Aberrant Ideas of Human Origins from Ancient Astronauts to Aquatic Apes: Books: Donna Kossy, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28

A brief history of evolutionary fraud, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/24

• Re: A brief history of evolutionary fraud--> Devolutionary Theory, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/24
• Re: A brief history of evolutionary fraud, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/24

Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23

• Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/23
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/25
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, deowll, 2005/11/27
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, spiznet, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Peter Alaca, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Tom McDonald, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Tedd Jacobs, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Peter Alaca, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Peter Alaca, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Tom McDonald, 2005/11/26
    • Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Doug Weller, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, G Horvat, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, G Horvat, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Doug Weller, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, t(nospam)kavanagh, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Tom McDonald, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, IE_Johansson, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Giselle? Are you around to comment? Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, deowll, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Doug Weller, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Larry Caldwell, 2005/11/27
• Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/23
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/29
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, rmacfarl, 2005/11/29
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, nospam, 2005/11/29
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, nospam, 2005/11/30
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/23
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, xenocog, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, jaded, 2005/11/30
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Eric Stevens, 2005/11/30
    • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30
• Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Larry Caldwell, 2005/11/27
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, JAE, 2005/11/27
  • Re: Amerind mtDNA lines Founded by coastal and Riparian colonization, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/27

Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23

• Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., rmacfarl, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., spiznet, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., mclark, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., rmacfarl, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., mclark, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., spiznet, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jois, 2005/11/29
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., pete, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., pete, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/26
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/28
• Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., pete, 2005/11/24
• Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/26
• Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/26
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/26
• Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/26
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/26
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/28
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/29
  • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Paul Crowley, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Postural bipedalism may have preceded and not causally connected to walking., Jim McGinn, 2005/11/29

By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/23

• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, pete, 2005/11/23
  • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Mark, 2005/11/23
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/23
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, JAE, 2005/11/23
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/24
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, r norman, 2005/11/24
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/24
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, r norman, 2005/11/24
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, JAE, 2005/11/24
    • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, rja . carnegie, 2005/11/25
  • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/23
• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, bert_primaat, 2005/11/23
• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, r norman, 2005/11/23
• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, deowll, 2005/11/23
• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, rja . carnegie, 2005/11/23
  • Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Rick Wagler, 2005/11/24
• Re: By true scientific standards, is evolution even a theory?, Larry Caldwell, 2005/11/27

Inca Giant, roydesmo, 2005/11/22

• Re: Inca Giant, pete, 2005/11/22
• Re: Inca Giant, Matt, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Inca Giant, spiznet, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Inca Giant, Matt, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Inca Giant, spiznet, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Inca Giant, Matt, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Inca Giant, pete, 2005/11/23

Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Jois, 2005/11/22

• Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Jois, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, deowll, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Jois, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, deowll, 2005/11/23
• Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Jois, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/24
  • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, nickname, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, nickname, 2005/11/23
• Re: Our lineage evolved but not towards a bigger and brainier us Topic #4, deowll, 2005/11/23

Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, Jois, 2005/11/22

• Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, pete, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, Jois, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, deowll, 2005/11/27
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, Jois, 2005/11/29
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, rmacfarl, 2005/11/29
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, Jois, 2005/11/29
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, rmacfarl, 2005/11/29
  • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Neanderthals, sex and modern humans Topic #3, spiznet, 2005/11/23
• Re: Neanderthal sex and modern humans Topic #3, spiznet, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Neanderthal sex and modern humans Topic #3, Jois, 2005/11/23
  • Re: Neanderthal sex and modern humans Topic #3, rmacfarl, 2005/11/23
  • Re: Neanderthal sex and modern humans Topic #3, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Neanderthal sex with modern humans; Topic #3, spiznet, 2005/11/24

Re: Ping Mario, spiznet, 2005/11/21

• Re: Ping Mario, Jois, 2005/11/22
  • Re: Ping Mario, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/22

Genetics & Genealogy: Article #3 Humans Began in Africa, Study Suggests Topic #2, Jois, 2005/11/21

• Re: Genetics & Genealogy: Article #3 Humans Began in Africa, Study Suggests Topic #2, deowll, 2005/11/22

Interesting Topics for Discussion #1 Located Here, Jois, 2005/11/21

• Re: Interesting Topics for Discussion #1 Located Here, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/22

The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/19

• Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
• Message not available
  • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/19
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Message not available
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/19
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Su Solomon, 2005/11/20
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/20
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, mclark, 2005/11/19
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/19
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Su Solomon, 2005/11/20
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
• Message not available
  • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Whitedog, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, pete, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Su Solomon, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jois, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jois, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, pete, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/21
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Dearth of Jim's Genius, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jois, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
• Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, BLT, DOA, 2005/11/22
  • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, pete, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, barbara, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, barbara, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, barbara, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/22
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Kevin S . Wilson, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Otto Bahn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Monroe, of course..., 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Kevin S . Wilson, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, mark@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Matthew L. Martin, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Chris McGonnell, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Monroe, of course..., 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Matthew L. Martin, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Rich Holmes, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, TeaLady (Mari C.), 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, mark@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Otto Bahn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Matthew L. Martin, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Otto Bahn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Mark Edwards, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, spiznet, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Mark South, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Chris McGonnell, 2005/11/24
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, dogsnus, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Chris McGonnell, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Chris McGonnell, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The X-treme Depths of Jim's Genius, Matthew L. Martin, 2005/11/23
    • Re: The Depths of Jim's Genius, Otto Bahn, 2005/11/22

He: head-bangers? or parttime slow divers? :-D, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/18

• Re: head-bangers? or parttime slow divers? :-D, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/23

Clovis and Richard Firestone, a nuclear scientist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/15

• Re: Clovis and Richard Firestone, a nuclear scientist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, pete, 2005/11/15
• Re: Clovis and Richard Firestone, a nuclear scientist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/15
• Re: Clovis and Richard Firestone, a nuclear scientist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, deowll, 2005/11/16
• Re: Clovis and Richard Firestone, a nuclear scientist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Larry Caldwell, 2005/11/20

Pa. May Let Hunters Use Prehistoric Weapon, Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/13

• Re: Pa. May Let Hunters Use Prehistoric Weapon, pete, 2005/11/13
  • Re: Pa. May Let Hunters Use Prehistoric Weapon, rmacfarl, 2005/11/14
  • Re: Pa. May Let Hunters Use Prehistoric Weapon, rmacfarl, 2005/11/14

New prehistoric crocodile, barry, 2005/11/12

• Re: New prehistoric crocodile, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/12

Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/12

• Re: Time to go for a swim, spiznet, 2005/11/12
  • Re: Time to go for a swim, rmacfarl, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, spiznet, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Jois, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, rmacfarl, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, rmacfarl, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Su Solomon, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Jois, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Time to go for a swim, Jois, 2005/11/15

Bo Graslund book review (was re: Bo Graslund.....), Lee Olsen, 2005/11/11

• Re: Bo Graslund book review (was re: Bo Graslund.....), Lee Olsen, 2005/11/11
  • Re: Bo Graslund book review (was re: Bo Graslund.....), Jois, 2005/11/16

14 mya Ape Finds From Barcelona Site, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/11

• Re: 14 mya Ape Finds From Barcelona Site, pete, 2005/11/11
  • Re: 14 mya Ape Finds From Barcelona Site, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/14
    • Re: 14 mya Ape Finds From Barcelona Site, Jois, 2005/11/16
    • Re: 14 mya Ape Finds From Barcelona Site, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28

Europeans found to be non-European!!, spiznet, 2005/11/11

• Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, G Horvat, 2005/11/11
  • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, pete, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, spiznet, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, G Horvat, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, G Horvat, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, spiznet, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, Jois, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, Larry Caldwell, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Europeans found to be non-European!!, G Horvat, 2005/11/12

Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or, how science education is good for everyone’s future), Roger Bagula, 2005/11/10

• Re: Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or , how science education is good for eve ryone’s future), Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/10
  • Re: Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or , how science education is good for eve ryone?s future), Su Solomon, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or , how science education is good for eve ryone’s future), Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or , how science education is good for eve ryone?s future), Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
• Re: Forward: -- Saving the Planet (Or, how science education is good for everyone?s future), pete, 2005/11/11

India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/09

• Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/10
  • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/11
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/11
  • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, barry, 2005/11/12
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, spiznet, 2005/11/12
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/12
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, barry, 2005/11/12
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, rmacfarl, 2005/11/14
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/15
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/15
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, spiznet, 2005/11/15
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/15
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/15
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, barry, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, spiznet, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/18
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/19
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, rmacfarl, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/21
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/21
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Su Solomon, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Su Solomon, 2005/11/18
    • Three - Eight Year Olds could have formed attack ape group, spiznet, 2005/11/19
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/18
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/20
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/22
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/17
    • Message not available
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/17
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, Jois, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, pete, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, spiznet, 2005/11/16
    • Re: India: Three Year Old Runs Marathon Distances, deowll, 2005/11/16

HIP, HIP HURRAY! Evolution Takes It on the Chin, Ed Conrad, 2005/11/09

• Re: HIP, HIP HURRAY! Evolution Takes It on the Chin, Laura M. Young, 2005/11/10
  • Re: HIP, HIP HURRAY! Evolution Takes It on the Chin, george, 2005/11/10

Re: Otzi Curse Strikes Again!, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/09

• Re: Otzi Curse Strikes Again!, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/09
  • Re: Otzi Curse Strikes Again!, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Otzi Curse Strikes Again!, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/09
• Re: Otzi Curse Strikes Again!, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/10

Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/08

• Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, spiznet, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, spiznet, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, rmacfarl, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Jois, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Jois, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/08
• Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/09
  • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, pete, 2005/11/09
• Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/09
  • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, spiznet, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Roger Bagula, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, Su Solomon, 2005/11/11
    • Local Village vs. Roving Is., Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., Seppo Renfors, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., spiznet, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., Seppo Renfors, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., rmacfarl, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Local Village vs. Roving Is., Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Astrophysics for Dummies, rmacfarl, 2005/11/12

Gigantopithecus News: Lived At The Same Time As Humans, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08

• Re: Gigantopithecus News: Lived At The Same Time As Humans, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08
• Re: Gigantopithecus News: Lived At The Same Time As Humans, Jois, 2005/11/08
• Re: Gigantopithecus News: Lived At The Same Time As Humans, pete, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Dwarfopithecus News: Lived At The Same Time As Humans, spiznet, 2005/11/08

A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/08

• Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/08
  • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/08
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/28
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/30
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Richard Dawkins, 2005/11/30
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/30
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jois, 2005/11/30
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/30
  • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/09
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/09
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jois, 2005/11/09
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jois, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/11
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/11
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/11
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/11
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/11
    • savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/12
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Rick Wagler, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/11
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/12
    • Re: aqua wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/12
    • Re: savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/12
    • Re: savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, JAE, 2005/11/12
    • Re: savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The OriginOf Bipedalism, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/13
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, JAE, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, pete, 2005/11/10
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/11
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/14
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/14
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/14
    • OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/10
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/11
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/16
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/11
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About TheOrigin Of Bipedalism, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/11
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About TheOrigin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About TheOrigin Of Bipedalism, mclark, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/12
    • Re: OT Quenching The Thirst On A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/10
• Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08
  • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Marc A. Moniz, 2005/11/08
  • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, rmacfarl, 2005/11/09
    • Joining Yahoo Groups, Jois, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Joining Yahoo Groups, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Joining Yahoo Groups, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: Joining Yahoo Groups, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Joining Yahoo Groups, Jois, 2005/11/16
    • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/28
  • Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The Origin Of Bipedalism, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/10

Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/07

• Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Jois, 2005/11/08
• Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Pauline M Ross, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Jois, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Matt, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, spiznet, 2005/11/08
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, pete, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/09
  • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Pauline M Ross, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Pauline M Ross, 2005/11/14
    • Message not available
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Pauline M Ross, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Move over Piltdown, here comes AAH, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/14

Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/07

• Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/09
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/10
    • Message not available
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, Lee Olsen, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Whitedog, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/13
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/11
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/12
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/10
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/15
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, Matt, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/21
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: Impeccable, Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, BLT, DOA, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/18
    • Message not available
    • Re: Impeccable, Matt, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Matt, 2005/11/18
    • Message to Matt Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Message to Matt Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Matt, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/16
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/21
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/21
    • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/21
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Impeccable, rmacfarl, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, mclark, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, spiznet, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/17
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/18
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/19
    • Re: Impeccable, JAE, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/20
    • Re: Impeccable, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/20
• Re: Impeccable, pete, 2005/11/10
  • Re: Impeccable, Su Solomon, 2005/11/11

Re: Lucy had KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/07

• Re: Lucy had KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/07
  • Richmond et al: Australopithecus afarensis ... almost certainly did not knuckle-walk., rmacfarl, 2005/11/08
  • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/14
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/22
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, deowll, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, spiznet, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Lucy had no KWing features (Re: Hobbit News! Jaw Bone; More Like An Australopithecus?, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/23
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Rick Wagler, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Rick Wagler, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/24
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Rick Wagler, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), spiznet, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/25
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Rick Wagler, 2005/11/26
    • Re: Lucy had KWing features (Richmond & Strait Nature 404:382), Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/27

Re: Chimps And Their Control Of Their Vocalizations, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/07

• Re: Chimps And Their Control Of Their Vocalizations, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/08
• Re: Chimps And Their Control Of Their Vocalizations, Rich Travsky, 2005/11/07
  • Re: Chimps And Their Control Of Their Vocalizations, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/08

(Aquatic) mice sing for love, like AK, spiznet, 2005/11/06

• Re: (Aquatic) mice sing for love, like AK, Jois, 2005/11/06
  • Re: (Aquatic) mice sing for love, like AK, spiznet, 2005/11/06
  • Re: (Aquatic) mice sing for love, like AK, spiznet, 2005/11/06

Zeropedality, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/05

• Re: Zeropedality, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/05
  • Re: Zeropedality, spiznet, 2005/11/05
    • Re: Zeropedality, Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/05
    • Re: Zeropedality, Jim McGinn, 2005/11/06

My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Jois, 2005/11/05

• Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., r norman, 2005/11/05
  • Message not available
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., r norman, 2005/11/05
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Jois, 2005/11/05
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., r norman, 2005/11/05
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/05
    • dry apers running (Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/05
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., rmacfarl, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., r norman, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Jois, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Rick Wagler, 2005/11/06
  • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., r norman, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., spiznet, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Rick Wagler, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/07
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Lorenzo L. Love, 2005/11/06
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/07
    • Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative., Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/06

Re: Hominid Fossils and Eustasy, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/05

• Re: Hominid Fossils and Eustasy, Paul Crowley, 2005/11/05
• Re: Hominid Fossils and Eustasy, alas_my_loves, 2005/11/06
  • Re: Hominid Fossils and Eustasy, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/06
  • Re: Hominid Fossils and Eustasy, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06

Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/04

• Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, r norman, 2005/11/04
  • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Marc Verhaegen, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Su Solomon, 2005/11/05
  • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, r norman, 2005/11/04
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/05
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, r norman, 2005/11/05
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, pete, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, r norman, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, r norman, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06
    • Re: Morphological evidence of marine adaptations in human kidneys, Mario Petrinovich, 2005/11/06