sci.anthropology.paleo
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
<prev [Thread] next>

Re: apiths: not incipient KWers

from [Rich Travsky]
Subject: Re: apiths: not incipient KWers
From: Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:52:14 -0700
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo 
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> 
> "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:436ED912.40B06BF9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> > > But the evidence for AAT is overwhelming as everybody can see:
> 
> > nonexistent.
> 
> Snipping away the obvious doesn't help you, my boy.

I only had to cut the nonsense.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Tobias: our earliest ancestors were savannah dwellers, (Re: butchering..., Rich Travsky
Next by Date:  Re: Tobias: our earliest ancestors were savannah dwellers, (Re: butchering..., Rich Travsky
Previous by Thread:  Re: apiths: not incipient KWers, Marc Verhaegen
Next by Thread:  Re: apiths: not incipient KWers, Marc Verhaegen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]