| Subject: | Aircraft speed & aircraft skin temperature question |
|---|---|
| From: | Don Stauffer <stauffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:49:17 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.aeronautics |
> I recently read some entrepreneur purchased a Learjet and intended to > install a rocket engine on the aircraft. It made me think what would prevent > you from taking the aircraft into suborbital flight assuming you could keep > the nose pointed in the proper direction. It's the trip back down I see a > problem; the heat of reentry. At what speed does the skin temperature start > becoming an issue? You got it! Actually, even as low as Mach 3 is a bit too hot for aluminum. Not only is pointing in the right direction for boost important, but, even assuming the skin would survive temperature, you'd need some way to control attitude in re-entry. Remember the Valkyrie? Mach three. Not only did it have high temp metals, it used fuel to cool skin in some areas. Seems to me I have an old F-4 manual somewhere, and there were some restrictions on sustained flight at certain parts of the envelope because of skin heating concerns. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | P-factor puzzles me, Murmur |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Aircraft speed & aircraft skin temperature question, Tom Sanderson |
| Previous by Thread: | P-factor puzzles me, Murmur |
| Next by Thread: | Aircraft speed & aircraft skin temperature question, Tom Sanderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |