Re: Mercury, a new WS-RM implementation

[Glen Daniels]

Hi guys,

Jaliya Ekanayake wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" 
> > That said, there are many areas of Mercury that still require serious 
> > work: threading model, transactions, persistence model etc.. Maybe if 
> > we combine the two and do a new version of Sandesha that'll be better 
> > all around. That is, use Mercury as a source of ideas and code but not 
> > continue "Mercury" in ASF but rather start a new effort to cut-n-paste 
> > stuff from wherever and get a damned good RM impl out to our users.
> A big +1 for this.

+1 from me, assuming we can get the cycles from people to make this 
happen.  Love to hear others' take on this - David? Ant? Amila?

> > Mercury can remain in wso2.org and we can EOL as the new one comes up 
> > and starts working properly.

+1.  Solve our immediate problems now, and also plan for the future we'd 
really like to see.

> > The most important and positive thing I've gotten from this discussion 
> > is that there's a vibrant and caring community around Sandesha. I have 
> > no interest in trying to replicate that elsewhere and fracture this 
> > community.

Well said, sir!

--Glen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx