sandesha-dev@ws.apache.org
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal

Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal
From: "Paul Fremantle"
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:18:23 +0100
And a link:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-os-01.html

Paul

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jaliya
>
> Actually, although Mercury has got a state machine model, I would
> personally prefer if we started directly from the State Machine
> published in the Appendix of the WSRM1.1 specification, and worked
> from here. I think we need two different implementations of a SM - one
> for 1.0 and one for 1.1, so we would have to create the equivalent
> documentation for 1.0. Amila has a pretty good starting point for the
> 1.0 SM, and there needs to be some further discussion about exactly
> how that should look.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jaliya Ekanayake <jnekanayake@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> The proposal starts with a "state machine model" which Mercury has come up
>> with.
>> So can you give little  bit more details on the state machine model that you
>> are suggesting?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jaliya
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Daniels" <glen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Paul Fremantle" <pzfreo@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: <sandesha-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal
>>
>>
>>> Hi Paul:
>>>
>>> Paul Fremantle wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have posted a proposal here:
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/ws-sandesha/MercuryProposal
>>>>
>>>> Please edit, improve, or discuss.... I put this in the wiki so that it
>>>> could be modified.
>>>
>>> Hm... I thought where we'd ended up discussion-wise was that we would get
>>> the Mercury code granted to Apache so that it could be examined / learned
>>> from / experimented with, but that we would aim to create a "third way" as
>>> the next step for both projects.
>>>
>>> In other words, the actual work that happens to make the new "unified" RM
>>> implementation (whatever it ends up being called) would start with a clean
>>> slate and take whatever it can from both Sandesha and Mercury, with the goal
>>> of making sure that all the active developers are involved and empowered.
>>>  Did I understand that right?
>>>
>>> Your proposal makes it sound rather like we're going to just start from
>>> the existing Mercury code and go from there.
>>>
>>> --Glen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> paul@xxxxxxxx
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>



-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@xxxxxxxx

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>