the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
eth2 is not configurated with an default route. could this be the failure?
(i don't think so because the route for the default gateway was set for eth1 only by /etc/conf.d/net)
output of route table:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
i hope that could bring some light on this situation ...
Bjørn Tore Sund schrieb:
Depends wat you mean by "goes via". Does it _accept_ traffic via
eth0, or does it _send_ traffic via eth0? If the latter, are
connections coming from outside the eth2 subnet, while default gateway
is through eth0?
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user->server / server->user) goes via eth0 and not
how specified in smb.con
via the eth2 interface.
i tried to bind it like this:
*interfaces = lo eth2
in smb.conf ... any idea?
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the