On Friday 02 April 2010 07:13:44 tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
(Messed up the samba-technical cc, sorry for the resend tridge)
> I'd now like to propose that the waf build of Samba4 move to stage 2,
> which means merging it into master.
+1. Looks reasonable for me.
> The build farm would continue to build with both build systems, as it
> does now. Once the s3 waf build that Kai is working on has progressed
> to the point where it is useful, I expect we will add a s3-waf build
> in the build farm as well.
Unfortunately I didn't have quite as much time to put into the S3 waf build as
I'd have liked. I'm hoping to have s3 building at least on some machines by
SambaXP, though, so other people can give this a try in the room.
> I don't think any of these things are reason enough to delay a merge
> into master however, with the proviso that the old build system is
> still the 'reference' build system that we recommend.
As I said before, I think this is a reasonable step.
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
Will code for cotton.