On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 00:16 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi Simo,
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/external/libtalloc.m4
> > b/source4/lib/ldb/external/libtalloc.m4
> > index a4c5b8a..b681541 100644
> > --- a/source4/lib/ldb/external/libtalloc.m4
> > +++ b/source4/lib/ldb/external/libtalloc.m4
> > @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ AC_SUBST(TALLOC_LIBS)
> > AC_CHECK_HEADER(talloc.h,
> > [AC_CHECK_LIB(talloc, talloc_init, [TALLOC_LIBS="-ltalloc"]) ],
> > - [PKG_CHECK_MODULES(TALLOC, talloc)])
> > + [PKG_CHECK_MODULES(TALLOC, talloc >= 2.0.0)])
> Can we perhaps reverse this test (trying with pkg-config before
> attempting to link to -ltalloc) ? With the current order of things we'll
> just find talloc using the first test and not actually see that what is
> on the system is out of date.
Yes, I guess we can.
Feel free to commit a change.