| Subject: | Re: the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix' |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Bartlett |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:14:20 +1000 |
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 20:56 -0400, simo wrote: > Perhaps I shouldn't have taken silence as an implicit ack, but normally > we nack on the list when a proposed patch is not liked. In all cases > where there are only acks we always assume all silent members are not > objecting. I think, particularly for reverts, that this is a very dangerous assumption. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix', John H Terpstra - Samba Team |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [RESEND] doc: clarify that mount.cifs never uses smb.conf, Suresh Jayaraman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix', simo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix', tridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |