|
|
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> There is currently no pCIFS so I "took" the name. :-)
Hmmm...
It's a good name to take, but...
- I think it'll cause some people to confuse the behavior of your pCIFS
with that of pNFS.
- As I mentioned, Peter Bram did put out something (a proposal, at least)
using the name pCIFS. People in the pNFS community are using the name
pCIFS when they talk about something that'd behave like pNFS.
As with the "Samba" name, my guess is that something better will come along.
> please try it out.
> it is pretty cool stuff.
I hope to do so. It's all about available time and (at the moment)
customers. :)
Chris -)-----
--
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh@xxxxxxxxx
|
|