samba-technical@lists.samba.org
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
<prev [Thread] next>

Re: readahead() which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise()

from [Henrik Nordstrom]
Subject: Re: readahead) which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise(
From: Henrik Nordstrom
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:28:26 +0200 
ons 2007-05-09 klockan 21:35 -0400 skrev derrell@xxxxxxxxx:

> In researching this, I discovered what appears to be a POSIX replacement.  It
> looks like readahead is equivalent to posix_fadvise(..., POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).

Not entirely equivalent. readahead() blocks, while POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED
doesn't..

Regards
Henrik
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: readahead() which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise(), Jeremy Allison
Next by Date:  Re: readahead() which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise(), Jeremy Allison
Previous by Thread:  Re: readahead() which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise(), Jeremy Allison
Next by Thread:  Re: readahead() which is Linux-only vs. posix_fadvise(), Jeremy Allison
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]