| Subject: | Re: Observation/Question on use of NTSTATUS in the Samba4 code base |
|---|---|
| From: | |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:16:24 +1000 |
Krishna, > No, SAMR is NTSTATUS. Others are WERROR, but it is still a minority, > and it is the historically less implemented pipes (other key NTSTATUS > pipes include NETLOGON and LSA). Just to expand a bit on Andrew's answer, I've noticed in the past that for some Win32 calls, the user API uses WERROR, but the underlying call on the network uses NTSTATUS. So it is possible that you have seen calls that are WERROR in the documemtation, but which are NTSTATUS from the point of view of Samba (where we deal with the underlying network calls). Cheers, Tridge |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Finished up lanman tests, Gerald (Jerry) Carter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: svn commit: samba r22020 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: auth include lib smbd, Andrew Bartlett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Observation/Question on use of NTSTATUS in the Samba4 code base, Andrew Bartlett |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Observation/Question on use of NTSTATUS in the Samba4 code base, Krishna Ganugapati |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |