|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
simo wrote:
>> If that makes this patch obsolete, then we should just
>> move forward with the struct design IMO. And coding in small
>> chunks (like patches submitted to lkml) will really help
>> when review the bzr tree.
>
> I am ok with this, I was just looking for agreement
> on Volker proposal, the patch was just to show that
> the whole change is not as big as people
> may think, nothing more.
Fair enough. Consider this the second ACK for using
a struct{} :-)
>> Can you point me at which method in winbindd_ads.c
>> is the culprit? I know about libads. But I want to trace
>> one winbind call.
>
> Man, do anybody read mails? Or do you all just read
> the first 10 lines?
Come on. It was *so* long :-)
> This was in my first mail:
> This affects primarily lookup_usergroups_member()*** and
> lookup_usergroups_memberof() in nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c
> as they need an intact DN.
>
> Seem nobody cared to read that mail, and jumped on
> the first 10 lines jra highlighted. ... Uhm I'll
> blame Jeremy :-)
You're one to talk:
(10:24:19 AM) simo: coffeedude, so we have a 3.0.25 base
bzr tree to branch from ?
(10:24:31 AM) vl: simo: Does anybody read mail????
Want me to pull up more evidence ?
cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF5F3jIR7qMdg1EfYRAss2AJ4wC6Z7g9DIgGErI2QNfNXEfC8b5QCgsRZH
UxYLM/pqBSkBmEyE2S16zdY=
=mU6J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|