samba-technical@lists.samba.org
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Managing DNs in libads only in utf8

Subject: Re: Managing DNs in libads only in utf8
From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter"
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:35:47 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:

>> If that makes this patch obsolete, then we should just
>> move forward with the struct design IMO.  And coding in small
>> chunks (like patches submitted to lkml) will really help
>> when review the bzr tree.
> 
> I am ok with this, I was just looking for agreement 
> on Volker proposal, the patch was just to show that
> the whole change is not as big as people
> may think, nothing more.

Fair enough.  Consider this the second ACK for using
a struct{} :-)

>> Can you point me at which method in winbindd_ads.c
>> is the culprit?  I know about libads.  But I want to trace
>> one winbind call.
> 
> Man, do anybody read mails? Or do you all just read 
> the first 10 lines?

Come on.  It was *so* long :-)

> This was in my first mail:
>    This affects primarily lookup_usergroups_member()*** and
>    lookup_usergroups_memberof() in nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c 
>    as they need an intact DN.
> 
> Seem nobody cared to read that mail, and jumped on 
> the first 10 lines jra highlighted. ... Uhm I'll
> blame Jeremy :-)

You're one to talk:

(10:24:19 AM) simo: coffeedude, so we have a 3.0.25 base
        bzr tree to branch from ?
(10:24:31 AM) vl: simo: Does anybody read mail????

Want me to pull up more evidence ?






cheers, jerry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF5F3jIR7qMdg1EfYRAss2AJ4wC6Z7g9DIgGErI2QNfNXEfC8b5QCgsRZH
UxYLM/pqBSkBmEyE2S16zdY=
=mU6J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>