| Subject: | Re: [ldb] [PATCH] LDB_SCOPE_ONELVEL indexing |
|---|---|
| From: | Volker Lendecke |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:42:15 +0100 |
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:53PM +1100, tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I still think the single record approach is better for the shares > database Volker is looking at. It still requires a lot more operations > to load a share than the single record approach. I'm not 100% certain either, I will play with both approaches and try to find where the speed tradeoffs are. Thanks for implementing this though! Volker |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ldb] [PATCH] LDB_SCOPE_ONELVEL indexing, Volker Lendecke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CTDB] progress, Alexander Bokovoy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ldb] [PATCH] LDB_SCOPE_ONELVEL indexing, Volker Lendecke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: svn commit: samba r20098 - in branches: SAMBA_3_0/source/auth SAMBA_3_0/source/include SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd SAMBA_3_0_24/source/auth SAMBA_3_0_24/source/include SAMBA_3_0_24/source/smbd, James Peach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |