| Subject: | Move change_owner_to_parent from open_file_ntcreate to open_file? |
|---|---|
| From: | Volker Lendecke |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:50:03 +0100 |
Hi, Jeremy! Right now I'm trying to consolidate the use of parent_dirname (which sucks ;-) a bit. Two users are inherit_acls and change_owner_to_parent. The open_file_ntcreate path calls parent_dirname potentially twice, via both those callers. As both inherit_acls change_owner_to_parent logically do close things, would moving them together via the attached disturb any code path I don't see? Open_file_fchmod (the other user of open_file) should not be affected, as it will never create the file. What do you think? Volker
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | a little change in _send functions of libnet, Rafal Szczesniak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Move change_owner_to_parent from open_file_ntcreate to open_file?, Volker Lendecke |
| Previous by Thread: | a little change in _send functions of libnet, Rafal Szczesniak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Move change_owner_to_parent from open_file_ntcreate to open_file?, Jeremy Allison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |