On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 11:19 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> simo wrote:
> > Actually there is no difference in the upgrade path
> > from 3.0.23d to 3.0.24, the changes were internal to ldb, and
> > target at getting more speed out of it (and they have not
> > yet been ported back to samba3 anyway). Of course I
> > use ldb primarily in Samba4.
> Have *you* personally tested an upgrade ? Just asking.
I think I did when ldb was ported by tridge and I fixed errors in the
mapping code, look at commits. As the new ldb code has not been
committed to SAMBA_3_0 I have not re-tested it.
> > If you don't feel confident I can't obviously push it.
> > I think ldb code is mature and stable enough to get into
> > samba3, but I see others have different views.
> We'll revisit this as things progress in SAMBA_3_0.
Let me know if I have to merge modifications to ldb to samba3 or i you
are going to remove it.
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer