|
|
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
>>> I guess I must be getting ldapsam confused with some other variety of
>>> ldapsam then? That's the only one I know of that I currently use
>>> (however, it is because of a plan to MOVE to LDAP, not because we're
>>> currently using it).
>
> --with-ldapsam is only the 2.2 backwards compatible option
> and is used to implement the ldap server and ldap port
> parameters. It has no direct effect on 'passdb backend = ldapsam'
>
> In smb.conf you will still be able to configure 'passdb
> backend = ldapsam_compat:ldap://localhost' if you need to
> the older 2.2 compatible schema (although I would like to
> remove that option at some point as well.
Thanks for the clarification. In that case, I personally don't see any
reason it needs to stay (and am pulling it from my next build testing).
--
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novosirj@xxxxxxxxx - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
|
|