samba-technical@lists.samba.org
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SAMBA4][PATCH] server role = pdc/bdc/standalone/member server

Subject: Re: [SAMBA4][PATCH] server role = pdc/bdc/standalone/member server
From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter"
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:50:12 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
| Jerry,
|
|  > I still think this this is a gratuitous and unnecessary
|  > change and will force more of a learning curve on users.
|  > I never see anyone complaining about the domain {logon,master}
|  > parameters on the general samba mailing list.
|
| Samba3 is relatively insensitive to these
| parameters for most deployments, whereas they are
| quite critical in Samba4. So if someone
| gets them wrong in Samba3 then they usually end up
| with a working system.
|
| In Samba4 we use the ADS layout for the SAM, and
| that layout changes quite a lot depending on
| your server role. So if you get it wrong then
| Samba4 fails to work at all. We've had quite a
| few people try Samba4 and fail to get a working server
| because these parameters have been wrong.
|
| The original point of separating the two parameters
| was that in the early days of Samba we could be a
| domain master because we'd worked out how to do that
| in nmbd, but we could not be a domain logon
| server, as we didn't have the necessary code in smbd.
| So we had two parameters as we had no choice. That
| reason has been dead for a very long time.

Yeah.  I was pretty sure i knew what the reaction to
my comment would be.  Your call.





cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDLidkIR7qMdg1EfYRAlAOAJ4izglYyTLwhu5fTcxw9baYUJGdCACg61E+
rDHKCn0jKbre1bSfZ2kuzdE=
=dKy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>