On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 19:03 +0200, Matthias Dieter WallnÃfer wrote:
> this is needed since we don't have implemented the functional level
> change trigger yet (which would also adjust the second value after the
> first change).
> The tool should support both the actual unchecked s4 behaviour and the
> Windows one - therefore this strange-looking exception handling.
I think what Jelmer is getting at is: Have you used this tool against
both servers, in the situation that you describe? It shouldn't be too
hard to install a server in 2000 mixed functional mode to check, right?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.