[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FW: composite link - candidate for respin, maybe

Subject: RE: FW: composite link - candidate for respin, maybe
From: Yong Lucy
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:52:34 -0500
Sorry, forget to answer this question in previous reply.

 
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think we agreed not to include IP if it took very little or no
> > > effort to include IP relative to LDP.
> >
> > [LY] In my opinion, the previous requirement draft addresses both kinds
> of
> > IP traffic, but not addresses other IP traffic.
> 
> 
> Please explain.  Both kinds but not other kind?
> 
> 
[LY] I mean that Internet IP traffic that is directly carried over IP/MPLS
network, i.e. without using any LSP.
 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>