[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: composite link - candidate for respin, maybe

Subject: Re: composite link - candidate for respin, maybe
From: Curtis Villamizar
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:49:13 -0400
In message <[email protected]>
John E Drake writes:
> Tony,
> Clearly there is extra overhead (roughly 2*(N - 1)* 40 bytes?) with N
> homogeneous bundled links versus one heterogeneous bundled link.  The
> concern I have is that having heterogeneous bundled links may
> complicate the data plane packet forwarding.

How the control plane information is presented does not "complicate
the data plane packet forwarding".

> A clear statement as to what we are trying to accomplish wrt IGP
> scaling by using bundled links would be good.

Please indicate what in the requirements we are discussing is not
clear rather than a blacket statement that the goals are not clear.

> Thanks,
> John

rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>