|Subject:||Re: Fwd: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions|
|Date:||Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:23:50 -0800|
Hi John,Not for rtgwg but for idr wg I have been struggling with this for the last 10 days and it's just hopeless.
Can we ask Bill to post real xml2rfc translation 1.34 which does the job right and we all are done ?
The beta 1.34r2 currently available still fails the new IDNITS check. Thx, R.
Folks submitting Internet Drafts which incorporate material from earlier IETF content should be aware of the below. You may also want to take a look at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg54839.html .I would be interested in knowing if any rtgwg draft authors believe they will be affected by this issue. Any discussion of this issue not specifically related to rtgwg drafts should be taken to the main IETF discussion list where you will find a lively discussion underway.--John Begin forwarded message:From: "Eric Rescorla" <[email protected]> Date: January 15, 2009 12:03:42 AM GMT-05:00 To: "Working Group Chairs" <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:03 PM Subject: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions To: [email protected] IETF Chair Russ Housley has asked WG chairs to apprise their WGs of the following information. If you've been following the IETF mailing list, you may be aware of the ongoing discussion about the impact of RFC 5378 on revised draft submissions. Briefly, RFC 5378 requires Contributors to grant a more expansive set of rights than were granted by RFC 3978, and 4748. If you are submitting a document which contains text contributed by others prior to the publication of RFC 5378 you may need to obtain additional rights from the copyright holders of that text in order to contribute under the 5378 terms. The IESG and the IETF Trustees are working to resolve those issues (seehttp://trustee.ietf.org/docs/Background-to-Draft-Update-to-IETF-Trust-Legal-Provisions.txt).However, at present I would advise care prior to submitting any draft which contains material derived from an RFC, draft, or mailing list message published prior to November 10, 2008. Speaking personally, I have chosen not to submit new versions of most of my drafts until matters are resolved. Please take any general discussion of RFC 5378 to [email protected] -Ekr [As WG Chair]_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Fwd: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions, John G. Scudder|
|Next by Date:||Re: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions, John G. Scudder|
|Previous by Thread:||Fwd: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions, John G. Scudder|
|Next by Thread:||Re: RFC 5378 and Draft Submissions, John G. Scudder|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|