[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: WG docs reminder

 Subject: Re: WG docs reminder mike shand Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:45:53 +0000
 ```At 07:20 20/11/2006, Michael Menth wrote: ``````Dear John, draft-bryant-shand-lf-conv-frmwk-03.txt draft-bryant-shand-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-03.txt draft-francois-ordered-fib-02.txt We support these drafts. Here are some comments on draft-bryant-shand-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-03.txt. ```4.4 5.a.i: Does Fig. 3 refer to this case? In Fig. 3 P is NOT a next hop of Y. I can imagine what this passage want, but it is hard to understand. ```Yes it does refer to figure 3. I agree it is slightly confusing. By "Y, a node whose next hop is P" we mean that S's next hop towards Y is P and conversely that S's next hop towards Z is not P We will try to clarify that in the next version ``````Regarding the iSPF calculation in 3): We studied the time savings achievable by incremental Shortest Path First algorithms in the context of resource management with resilience. Experimental results showed that the computation time can be reduced by up to 90% compared to full SPF computations when we also recomputed the new load distribution. http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/~menth/Publications/Menth06r.pdf `````` Interesting paper. I'll read it in depth later. ```There are a number of furhter optimizations which can be applied to the not-via iSPF computation. Have you thought about the effect of the use of the "early termination" once the not-via addresses have been re-attached. ```Typos: * 1. last sentence "in not" -> "is not" * 10. "process the chose encapsulation" -> "process the chosen encapsulation" * 14. "If an attacker were" -> "If an attacker was" ``````Thanks for the first two ```actually the use of "were" (the subjunctive) is better English than "was" in this context. ``` ``````Best wishes, Michael John G. Scudder wrote: ```As a reminder, three documents were proposed as WG documents at our IETF-67 meeting: ```draft-bryant-shand-lf-conv-frmwk-03.txt draft-bryant-shand-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-03.txt draft-francois-ordered-fib-02.txt ```Rough consensus at the in-person meeting favored adoption. The deadline for comments to the list is November 21 (this coming Tuesday). ```--John _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ``````-- Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206 phone: (+49)-931/888-6644, fax: (+49)-931/888-6632 mailto:[email protected] http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ``````_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ```
 Current Thread WG docs reminder, John G. Scudder Re: WG docs reminder, Greg Bernstein Re: WG docs reminder, JP Vasseur RE: WG docs reminder, Don Fedyk Message not available RE: WG docs reminder, mike shand RE: WG docs reminder, John G. Scudder Re: WG docs reminder, Michael Menth Re: WG docs reminder, mike shand <= Re: WG docs reminder, Mick Seaman RE: WG docs reminder, Don Fedyk RE: WG docs reminder, Zafar Ali \(zali\) Re: WG docs reminder, Alia Atlas