I pinged Dave on this, and he would be happy to work on this if there's
interest in the WG.
Saturday, January 21, 2006, 5:05:24 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> It has been awfully quiet on the GTSMbis front lately
> I think this is important work and we should be pushing it for
> Standards Track on high priority.
> One particular area where the doc may need more text is dealing with
> TCP RSTs. Do we assume that GTSM-enabled peers also send TCP RST's
> (related to GTSM-enabled sessions) with TTL=255? Note that if the
> system doesn't use TTL=255 for default (current IANA default TTL is
> 64), the host kernel will need a modification. Do we verify that on
> receipt? If not, how do we make GTSM resistant to TCP RST attacks?
Rtgwg mailing list