[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WG Item?: draft-zinin-microloop-analysis-01.txt

Subject: Re: WG Item?: draft-zinin-microloop-analysis-01.txt
From: Curtis Villamizar
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:24:28 -0400
In message <[email protected]>
Alex Zinin writes:
>  
> Curtis,
>  
> > Other than some concern about whether an efficient unencumbered
> > algorithm to determine Type A, B, or C, I have no objections to this
> > being accepted as a WG document.
>  
> As Alia explained, the algorithm in the document uses the before-failure
> calculations done by IP FRR. The after-failure calculations are the same
> you'd need to do to find LFAs for the after-failure topology for IP FRR.
> You then need to visit all prefixes, identify the type and calculate the
> safe neighbors for Type-Bs. There are some straight-forward optimizations
> to shorten the list of prefixes that need to be checked (e.g. early
> detection of type-As and some type-Cs).
>  
> Re IPR: to the best of my knowledge, at this point I am not aware of any
> patents issued to, or claims filed or being prepared by me, any other
> person, or a company with regards to the algorithm documented in the draft.
>  
> --
> Alex


Alex,

Thanks for making that statement regarding IPR.

Curtis

_______________________________________________
Rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>