[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WG Item?: draft-zinin-microloop-analysis-01.txt

Subject: Re: WG Item?: draft-zinin-microloop-analysis-01.txt
From: "Adrian Farrel"
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:37:58 +0100
> >It seems to me that the whole IPFRR effort is way more complicated
> >than what it set out to replace, RSVP-TE FRR, when the justification
> >for doing IPFRR was to avoid complexity.  Regardless, here we are.
> I have a certain sympathy with that position. However, remember that the
> microloop prevention came out of addressing a problem which was not
> addressed, and which remains a problem, with MPLS-TE when used with LDP.
> i.e. the loop prevention is applicable to that environment as well.

Did I miss this problem being brought to the MPLS working group?


Rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>