[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: node disjoint and SRLG

Subject: Re: node disjoint and SRLG
From: Stewart Bryant
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:14:02 +0000

mike shand wrote:

At 17:35 22/11/2004 -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

In message <[email protected]>
Alia Atlas writes:
> Curtis,
> I think that Mike's numbers are for the percentage of node failures that
> can't be repaired with a single primary tunnel+directed forwarding.
> I.e., it covers the node disjoint case pretty well.
> Alia

What he's saying is that in the worst case he looked at 13.77% of the
cases were not covered by single hop.  With 2 hop there is 100%
coverage but there is still some question about how computationally
feasible the 2 hop algoritm is.
The use of the word hop may be confusing here. This is two stage
rather than two hop, and there may be multiple hops per stage.

Rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>