At 12:54 PM 10/22/2004, mike shand wrote:
I was thinking of computing the delay essentially based on the final
hopCount and the final maxHorizon. Instead, I think you are taking the
delay based on each hopCount and maxHorizon, for each failed link, and
then taking the max.
Yes. That is correct. I think this explains both our confusions!
Well, a combo of that and my not realizing you were pruning the RSPT. I
knew it had to be an ECMP case that caused the issue, but without the
pruning, I couldn't find a way to have the different updates matter.
Sorry for being confused; I do think this needs substantially more
The whole thing is confusing at the best of times.!
Sorry I haven't been able to give this much time this week.
It's a busy week for everyone :-)
As you can tell, I think the ordered SPFs is a very interesting idea. The
question is how it works in practice with all the extra details.
Rtgwg mailing list