|
|
"Steve Fenwick" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nospam-544870.14392423062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article
> <7731f331-da86-4d2c-bdd0-d8d16b81625a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Steve Russo <srusso@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 6:58 pm, tacit <tac...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > In article
>> > <bc776f8f-872e-418f-a0bb-0397accbd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > Steve Russo <sru...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I use Time Warner so I will be affected by this, however, from what
>> > > I've read (and heard) so far, they will only be shutting down access
>> > > to those news groups established as offensive from a child
>> > > pornography
>> > > standpoint.
>> >
>> > Reread the CNET article. Time Warner will no longer be hosting any
>> > newsgroups whatsoever. If you're a TW user, time to find another
>> > Usenet
>> > provider (or better yet, drop Time Warner).
>> >
>> > --
>> > Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all
>> > athttp://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
>>
>> Well, it's happened. As of today, Time Warner is not supporting new
>> group access at all. I'm guessing it was a money saving move on their
>> part - made convenient by Andrew Cuomo's investigations. I can use
>> Google (eh). I'll give Motzarella a try. Any other suggestions?
>
> teranews.com. $3.95 one-time registration, no monthly fees.
>
Actually... Motzarella seemed pretty painless and I was able to configure
it within Windows (Vista) Mail, so it's also seamless. So far, so good.
|
|