|
|
But there is more to it then that. Ie how software developers should note
your copyright, links back to the source OK? Or must we distribute it. Etc etc
-----Original Message-----
From: qt-interest-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:qt-interest-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:58 AM
To: qt-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Qt-interest] Licensing
Em Quinta-feira 03 Junho 2010, às 14:44:55, Scott Aron Bloom escreveu:
> My basic view is this, when Nokia made this decision to go LGPL, they
> must have had an expectation in mind of how closed source developers
> would use the license, a preferred way if you will. My plea, is just
> document that preferred way, and let us developers follow it.
In order of preference, we'd like:
1) that you release the sources
2) link dynamically
That doesn't mean they're the only available options to you. But we clearly
prefer that you link dynamically. Then we have nice libQtCore.so or QtCore4.dll
files around in your app :-)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
_______________________________________________
Qt-interest mailing list
Qt-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
|
|