|
|
"David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:h1e0nh$tp0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Also note that the free Qt plug-in is not the same (the Add-in) is not the
> same as the one available for commercial Qt customers (the Visual Studio
> integration). They provide similar functionality, but the paid one embeds
> the Qt Designer within the IDE, where as the free one merely launches the
> external Qt Designer. My feeling is the external Qt Designer has more
> features and polish than the internal one, so this is no great loss.
What's nice about the integration pack is that it automatically sets up your
moc steps etc,
adds the ability to create qt projects and add qt forms to an existing project
from the IDE.
No need to run moc separately.
There was an older "add-in" that did some of this. I wonder
what the actual differences are between the current add-in and the
VSIntegration?
To me, integrated build/moc features are more useful than having the designer
in the
IDE, especially since, as you say, it's a less robust version of the designer.
Is there some documentation on line for this add-in?
_______________________________________________
Qt-interest mailing list
Qt-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
|
|