On 27.11.06 01:33:25, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 20:13, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 26.11.06 18:32:18, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > > http://doc.trolltech.com/4.2/qlist.html#at
> > > "const T & QList::at ( int i ) const
> > > Returns the item at index position i in the list.
> > > i must be a valid index position in the list (i.e., 0 <= i < size()).
> > > This function is very fast (constant time).
> > > See also value() and operator()."
> > >
> > > Shall I assume it doesn't do what I should assume it does?
> > If you would tell us what you assume, we might be able to help you.
> > > http://www.research.att.com/~bs/3rd_safe.pdf
> > You don't really expect anyone here to read through 34 pages to find
> > out, what you assume do you? Which page shows what you mean?
> > Andreas
> I find this behavior undesierable:
> QStringList sl(QString("a:b:c").split(":"));
> ASSERT failure in QList<T>::at: "index out of range",
> file /home/hattons/opt/com/trolltech/qt-4-snapshot/include/QtCore/qlist.h,
> line 370
Well, doc's tell you not to do so, i.e. before you index into a list
check the size against your parameter ;)
> You do that with a production server a few times, and you are out of the
> server business. I concede that a greater problem is corrupted data due to
> something such as a QList::takeLast() throwing an exception and not restoring
> the initial state. I believe that is one reason I'm unlikely to see
> QList::at() throw an exception.
Exceptions are not used inside Qt itself (except for a handful of
places, where they are transported to the outside) for totally different
reasons. IIRC the signal/slot mechanism is not exception-safe, but there
have been discussions about that here some time ago...
> Nonetheless, I believe that wise use of exceptions is superior to the use of
> ASSERTs calling aborts. They also provide a superior approach to finding
> errors than does dumping the life story of a process to stderr.
see above, Qt never used exceptions. First because they were not
supported on all platforms, lastly because they don't play well with
> Sure, you can do that by passing error codes around, but that tends to lead
Some people have a different opinion about that. Exceptions vs. error
codes is a bit like the "best editor", or "best ide"...
You now have Asian Flu.
To unsubscribe - send a mail to qt-interest-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the subject or the body.
List archive and information: http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/