|
|
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>
>> The --accel option will provide us the ability of defining which
>> accelerator to pick at run time. It has the advantage of not using
>> the not-well-accepted constructor directives, and also, of stabilishing
>> a way to define priorities among accelerators.
>>
>> The ones registered first, are tried first.
>>
>
> Logically speaking, kqemu should be two accelerators, right? -accel kqemu
> and -accel kqemu-kernel? They should share most of the same obviously.
>
> That would eliminate the need for the various kqemu options.
do we want to keep them for the sake of compatibility ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>
>
>
--
Glauber Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
|
|