pgsql.hackers (date)
October 31, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Robert Haas, 22:04
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Robert Haas, 17:12
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Marko Tiikkaja, 17:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Weird PL/Python elog output, Marko Kreen, 16:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Andrew Dunstan, 15:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Tom Lane, 14:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Peter Eisentraut, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] \d+ for long view definitions?, Josh Berkus, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Josh Berkus, 13:35
- Re: [HACKERS] PL/Perl backed crashed during spi_exec_query, Tom Lane, 13:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Andrew Dunstan, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 12:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Peter Eisentraut, 09:59
- Re: [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Peter Eisentraut, 09:47
- [HACKERS] Segfault in PL/Python, Peter Eisentraut, 08:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Greg Stark, 08:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 07:28
- Re: [HACKERS] \du quite ugly in 8.4, Peter Eisentraut, 06:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Weird PL/Python elog output, Peter Eisentraut, 06:13
- Re: [HACKERS] FTP/GIT/WWW server move, Peter Eisentraut, 04:54
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, David Fetter, 02:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Jaime Casanova, 01:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Tom Lane, 00:25
October 30, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch set under development to add usage reporting., Greg Smith, 23:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Jeff Janes, 20:02
- [HACKERS] PL/Perl backed crashed during spi_exec_query, Alexey Klyukin, 19:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Tom Lane, 18:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Jeff Davis, 18:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Robert Haas, 17:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Tom Lane, 17:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Stephen Frost, 16:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Jeff Davis, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Pavel Stehule, 14:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:12
- Re: [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Pavel Stehule, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Jeff Davis, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Weird PL/Python elog output, Marko Kreen, 11:13
- [HACKERS] Weird PL/Python elog output, Peter Eisentraut, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... INHERITS (parent INCLUDING xxx), Tom Lane, 10:02
- Re: [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] FTP/GIT/WWW server move, Dave Page, 09:28
- [HACKERS] some dead code in functioncmds.c, Pavel Stehule, 09:24
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Hitoshi Harada, 07:44
- [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... INHERITS (parent INCLUDING xxx), Itagaki Takahiro, 04:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Peter Eisentraut, 04:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Itagaki Takahiro, 01:07
- Re: [HACKERS] grant with hierarchy option, Tom Lane, 00:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Greg Stark, 00:20
October 29, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Itagaki Takahiro, 23:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Robert Haas, 22:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:51
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Greg Stark, 19:52
- [HACKERS] grant with hierarchy option, Peter Eisentraut, 19:24
- Re: [HACKERS] \d+ for long view definitions?, Peter Eisentraut, 18:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Jeff Davis, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Peter Eisentraut, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Hy, Robert Haas, 17:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 16:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Jeff Davis, 15:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Scott Bailey, 14:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Jeff Davis, 14:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Jeff Davis, 14:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Andres Freund, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Greg Stark, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] about GiST indexes, Dimitri Fontaine, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 13:13
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Hannu Krosing, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Show schema size with \dn+, Stephen Frost, 11:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Pavel Stehule, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Tom Lane, 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Peter Eisentraut, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 09:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Tom Lane, 09:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Show schema size with \dn+, Peter Eisentraut, 09:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 08:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Thom Brown, 08:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Pavel Stehule, 08:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 08:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Cédric Villemain, 07:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Peter Eisentraut, 07:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Peter Eisentraut, 07:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Nikhil Sontakke, 06:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Richard Huxton, 05:37
- [HACKERS] FTP/GIT/WWW server move, Dave Page, 05:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Hannu Krosing, 04:54
- [HACKERS] Grouping sets, Pavel Stehule, 04:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Pavel Stehule, 03:48
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Peter Eisentraut, 03:47
- [HACKERS] Proposal - temporal contrib module, Scott Bailey, 03:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Pavel Stehule, 03:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Pavel Stehule, 00:39
October 28, 2009
- [HACKERS] Syntax for partitioning, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:15
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Robert Haas, 22:10
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Tom Lane, 20:45
- Re: [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Marko Tiikkaja, 20:21
- [HACKERS] WIP: push AFTER-trigger execution into ModifyTable node, Tom Lane, 18:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Show schema size with \dn+, Guillaume Lelarge, 18:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Hannu Krosing, 17:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Hannu Krosing, 16:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 16:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 16:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 16:29
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha2 bundled -- please verify, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 16:28
- Re: [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Alvaro Herrera, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 16:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 16:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Tom Lane, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Jeff Davis, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Kenneth Marshall, 15:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Tom Lane, 15:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 15:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 15:20
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Hannu Krosing, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 15:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 13:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Kevin Grittner", 13:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Josh Berkus, 12:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 12:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 12:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 12:10
- [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus outer joins, Tom Lane, 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Kevin Grittner", 10:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Alvaro Herrera, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Alvaro Herrera, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Kevin Grittner", 10:14
- [HACKERS] Show schema size with \dn+, Anders Steinlein, 10:11
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), Alvaro Herrera, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Tom Lane, 09:43
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), Alvaro Herrera, 09:27
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 09:27
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), Heikki Linnakangas, 08:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 07:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 05:37
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 04:33
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), Heikki Linnakangas, 04:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Peter Eisentraut, 02:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 00:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 00:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Tom Lane, 00:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Josh Berkus, 00:15
October 27, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 23:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Tom Lane, 23:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 23:40
- [HACKERS] Where's the docs?, Josh Berkus, 23:35
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), Robert Haas, 23:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 23:24
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 23:14
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Robert Haas, 22:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 22:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 22:29
- [HACKERS] pg_read_file() and non-ascii input file, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:27
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Tom Lane, 22:18
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Robert Haas, 22:10
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Alvaro Herrera, 22:01
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, David Fetter, 21:20
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Tom Lane, 21:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 21:05
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Robert Haas, 20:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 20:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Christophe Pettus, 19:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Merlin Moncure, 19:37
- Re: [HACKERS] xpath_table equivalent, Scott Bailey, 18:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Extraneous newlines in logfile from vacuumdb, Tom Lane, 17:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 17:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 16:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Delete cascade with three levels bug ?, Tom Lane, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 15:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 15:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 14:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Delete cascade with three levels bug ?, Tom Lane, 14:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 14:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Robert Haas, 13:51
- Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?, Robert Haas, 13:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Delete cascade with three levels bug ?, Tom Lane, 13:30
- [HACKERS] Extraneous newlines in logfile from vacuumdb, Tim Landscheidt, 13:27
- Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?, Andres Freund, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 13:14
- Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?, Tom Lane, 13:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 13:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Kevin Grittner", 13:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 13:06
- Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?, Robert Haas, 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Should we warn users about SETs which have no effect?, Josh Berkus, 13:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Delete cascade with three levels bug ?, Robert Haas, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Robert Haas, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Josh Berkus, 12:43
- [HACKERS] Should we warn users about SETs which have no effect?, Josh Berkus, 12:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Jeff Davis, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 11:16
- [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?, Tom Lane, 10:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Delete cascade with three levels bug ?, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?, Alvaro Herrera, 10:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Merlin Moncure, 09:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Kenneth Marshall, 08:52
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Sam Mason, 08:37
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Andrew Dunstan, 08:30
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Merlin Moncure, 08:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 07:34
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 07:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 06:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 05:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Peter Eisentraut, 03:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Peter Eisentraut, 02:43
- [HACKERS] New VACUUM FULL, Itagaki Takahiro, 00:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 00:38
- Re: [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Andrew Dunstan, 00:18
October 26, 2009
- [HACKERS] half OOT, plv8js group created ^^, Kiswono Prayogo, 23:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 23:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 23:16
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Tom Lane, 23:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 21:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Christophe Pettus, 21:35
- Re: [HACKERS] a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, 노홍찬, 21:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 21:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Itagaki Takahiro, 20:24
- Re: [HACKERS] "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?, Itagaki Takahiro, 20:20
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Alvaro Herrera, 19:52
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Andres Freund, 19:47
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Tom Lane, 19:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 19:41
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Greg Stark, 19:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 19:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Andrew Dunstan, 19:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Tom Lane, 19:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 18:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Pavel Stehule, 18:53
- Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY bug or feature?, Tom Lane, 18:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 18:30
- Re: [HACKERS] "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?, Jeff Davis, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?, Alvaro Herrera, 18:11
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Josh Berkus, 18:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Andrew Dunstan, 18:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, "David E. Wheeler", 17:57
- [HACKERS] "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 17:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Kris Jurka, 17:49
- [HACKERS] GROUP BY bug or feature?, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 17:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 17:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Pavel Stehule, 17:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 17:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 17:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, "David E. Wheeler", 17:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:59
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, "Kevin Grittner", 16:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 16:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Josh Berkus, 16:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Tom Lane, 16:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Pavel Stehule, 16:16
- Re: [HACKERS] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.5alpha2 Now Available, Peter Eisentraut, 16:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, Andrew Dunstan, 15:43
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Chris Browne, 15:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 14:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Stark, 14:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 14:01
- [HACKERS] Re: Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Greg Stark, 13:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Robert Haas, 13:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Tom Lane, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 13:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 13:23
- [HACKERS] Re: a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, Greg Stark, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 13:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Greg Stark, 13:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Jeff Davis, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 12:31
- [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:30
- [HACKERS] Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Tom Lane, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Jaime Casanova, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Greg Stark, 12:09
- Re: [HACKERS] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.5alpha2 Now Available, "David E. Wheeler", 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 12:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 12:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Peter Eisentraut, 11:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 11:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Jaime Casanova, 11:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, "Kevin Grittner", 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Tightening binary receive functions, Andrew Gierth, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Alvaro Herrera, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Robert Haas, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Alvaro Herrera, 10:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 10:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Tom Lane, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Alvaro Herrera, 10:06
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Peter Eisentraut, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Merlin Moncure, 09:48
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Simon Riggs, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Simon Riggs, 09:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 09:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 09:28
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 09:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Alvaro Herrera, 09:11
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Simon Riggs, 09:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 09:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Alvaro Herrera, 08:53
- [HACKERS] 8.4.1 strange GiST (btree_gist?) messages + index row size error (possible BUG, test case + test data), Sergey Konoplev, 08:49
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 04:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Tightening binary receive functions, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Itagaki Takahiro, 03:12
- [HACKERS] Proposal: String key space for advisory locks, Christophe Pettus, 01:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Josh Berkus, 00:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 00:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 00:18
October 25, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 23:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Robert Haas, 23:29
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, David Fetter, 22:57
- Re: [HACKERS] (WIP) VACUUM REWRITE - CLUSTER by ctid, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:54
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Tom Lane, 22:48
- [HACKERS] Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order, Tom Lane, 22:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Statement Level Deferred Triggers, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:11
- Re: [HACKERS] a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, 노홍찬, 21:45
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, David Fetter, 21:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 20:33
- Re: [HACKERS] misleading comments in pgbench, Tatsuo Ishii, 20:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 20:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 19:48
- Re: [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Dave Page, 18:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 18:21
- [HACKERS] License clarification: BSD vs MIT, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 18:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, Greg Smith, 16:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Jeff Davis, 15:47
- Re: [HACKERS] a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, 노홍찬, 12:37
- [HACKERS] per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost, Robert Haas, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Simon Riggs, 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function, Tom Lane, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Guillaume Smet, 06:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, James Mansion, 06:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Peter Eisentraut, 05:08
October 24, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 22:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 21:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 21:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 21:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 20:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Tom Lane, 19:38
- [HACKERS] WIP patch: EvalPlanQual rewrite, Tom Lane, 19:16
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Peter Eisentraut, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 17:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Tightening binary receive functions, Andrew Gierth, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Robert Haas, 14:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Greg Smith, 13:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 13:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 13:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 13:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Magnus Hagander, 12:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Andrew Dunstan, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 12:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Magnus Hagander, 12:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Magnus Hagander, 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Tightening binary receive functions, James Pye, 12:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Simon Riggs, 12:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 10:56
- [HACKERS] Parsing config files in a directory, Magnus Hagander, 09:41
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Stefan Moeding, 02:00
October 23, 2009
- [HACKERS] misleading comments in pgbench, Jeff Janes, 23:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Statement Level Deferred Triggers, Robert Haas, 21:49
- [HACKERS] Statement Level Deferred Triggers, Andres Freund, 19:29
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Josh Berkus, 19:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Tom Lane, 17:55
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Jeff Davis, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Tom Lane, 16:25
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Tom Lane, 15:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Greg Stark, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Magnus Hagander, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Robert Haas, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Pavel Stehule, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Tom Lane, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Simon Riggs, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Robert Haas, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Merlin Moncure, 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Alvaro Herrera, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, "Kevin Grittner", 11:15
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, "Kevin Grittner", 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Tom Lane, 10:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Tom Lane, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Andrew Dunstan, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, David Fetter, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Robert Haas, 10:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Tom Lane, 10:04
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Tom Lane, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Tom Lane, 09:41
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 09:23
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Robert Haas, 08:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 08:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:30
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 07:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, KaiGai Kohei, 07:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Simon Riggs, 06:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, KaiGai Kohei, 06:38
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 05:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Pavel Stehule, 05:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Simon Riggs, 04:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:30
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Peter Eisentraut, 04:28
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:24
- Re: [HACKERS] (WIP) VACUUM REWRITE - CLUSTER by ctid, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:55
- [HACKERS] pre-proposal: type interfaces, Jeff Davis, 01:17
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Peter Eisentraut, 01:07
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, Robert Haas, 00:09
October 22, 2009
- [HACKERS] (WIP) VACUUM REWRITE - CLUSTER by ctid, Itagaki Takahiro, 23:08
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, Robert Haas, 22:53
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Alvaro Herrera, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Alvaro Herrera, 21:25
- Re: [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Magnus Hagander, 19:59
- Re: [HACKERS] table corrupted, "Joshua D. Drake", 19:16
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Tom Lane, 19:12
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, "Joshua D. Drake", 19:08
- [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs, again, Marko Tiikkaja, 18:08
- [HACKERS] plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:34
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Stark, 16:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Dimitri Fontaine, 15:13
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Robert Haas, 14:48
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, "Kevin Grittner", 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Josh Berkus, 14:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Reversing flow of WAL shipping, Greg Stark, 14:20
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Tom Lane, 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Stark, 14:01
- Re: [HACKERS] B-tree leaf node structure, Jeff Davis, 13:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Marc Munro, 12:47
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Pavel Stehule, 11:47
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Tom Lane, 11:37
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Robert Haas, 11:33
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Pavel Stehule, 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 11:16
- Re: [HACKERS] B-tree leaf node structure, Tom Lane, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 11:03
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Robert Haas, 11:01
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Cédric Villemain, 11:01
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Tom Lane, 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Pavel Stehule, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Andrew Dunstan, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Tom Lane, 10:12
- [HACKERS] client_lc_messages, Alvaro Herrera, 09:59
- How to Stop Hackers [ http://www.StopHackers.tk/ ], http://crackpasswordyourself.tk/ http://www.HackYahooPassword.Tk/, 09:11
- [HACKERS] Application name patch - v3, Dave Page, 09:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Rod Taylor, 08:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Robert Haas, 08:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 07:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 07:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Pavel Stehule, 07:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 07:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Pavel Stehule, 07:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 07:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Pavel Stehule, 07:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Richard Huxton, 06:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Pavel Stehule, 06:36
- [HACKERS] Using views for row-level access control is leaky, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Dimitri Fontaine, 06:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Simon Riggs, 03:21
- [HACKERS] B-tree leaf node structure, edwardyf, 02:55
- [HACKERS] some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax, Pavel Stehule, 02:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Simon Riggs, 02:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Heikki Linnakangas, 00:55
October 21, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Prelim specs for parser hooks for plpgsql, Pavel Stehule, 22:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Pavel Stehule, 22:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Prelim specs for parser hooks for plpgsql, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 17:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 17:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 17:02
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha2 bundled -- please verify, "Marc G. Fournier", 16:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Simon Riggs, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Merlin Moncure, 16:28
- [HACKERS] alpha2 bundled -- please verify, Peter Eisentraut, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 16:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Josh Berkus, 16:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Heikki Linnakangas, 16:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Josh Berkus, 16:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Josh Berkus, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 14:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Robert Haas, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Robert Haas, 14:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Josh Berkus, 13:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:57
- [HACKERS] Prelim specs for parser hooks for plpgsql, Tom Lane, 13:52
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Andrew Dunstan, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Simon Riggs, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Andrew Dunstan, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Tom Lane, 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 12:48
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 12:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 12:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 12:39
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Andrew Dunstan, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 12:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:24
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 12:19
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:47
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Heikki Linnakangas, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Tom Lane, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:39
- [HACKERS] URL Managment - C Function help, Samuel ROZE, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Andrew Dunstan, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Robert Haas, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Andrew Dunstan, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 10:56
- Re: [HACKERS] \du quite ugly in 8.4, Tom Lane, 10:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable", Tom Lane, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 10:27
- [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable", Alvaro Herrera, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 09:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Rod Taylor, 09:45
- Re: [HACKERS] \du quite ugly in 8.4, Alvaro Herrera, 09:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Andrew Dunstan, 09:08
- ecm2001 titanium torrent rapidshare download 0806, ecm2001 winols cpwin, 08:43
- Re: [HACKERS] \du quite ugly in 8.4, Thom Brown, 08:38
- [HACKERS] \du quite ugly in 8.4, Peter Eisentraut, 08:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 07:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Simon Riggs, 07:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Magnus Hagander, 06:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Magnus Hagander, 06:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Simon Riggs, 06:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 06:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Simon Riggs, 06:06
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Peter Eisentraut, 06:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Peter Eisentraut, 05:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 05:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 05:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Simon Riggs, 05:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 05:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Heikki Linnakangas, 05:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Simon Riggs, 05:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 03:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Greg Smith, 01:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Itagaki Takahiro, 00:24
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Itagaki Takahiro, 00:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, "Marc G. Fournier", 00:08
October 20, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Andrew Chernow, 23:19
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 23:07
- Re: [HACKERS] ProcessUtility_hook, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 20:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Robert Haas, 20:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Josh Berkus, 20:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Tom Lane, 20:06
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha1 bundled -- please verify, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 19:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Josh Berkus, 19:54
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha2 release notes, Josh Berkus, 18:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 18:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Tom Lane, 18:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 18:09
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha2 release notes, Tom Lane, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, "Marc G. Fournier", 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, "Marc G. Fournier", 18:05
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha2 release notes, Josh Berkus, 18:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly, Tom Lane, 17:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 17:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly, daveg, 17:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, daveg, 17:47
- [HACKERS] alpha2 release notes, Peter Eisentraut, 17:11
- [HACKERS] Using pgcrypt to meet PCI compliance?, Chris Price, 17:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Tom Lane, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha1 bundled -- please verify, Peter Eisentraut, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 15:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Pavel Stehule, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 15:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Andrew Dunstan, 15:07
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 15:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Bill Moran, 14:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Bernd Helmle, 14:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Tom Lane, 14:53
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Zdenek Kotala, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Tom Lane, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, Jeff Davis, 14:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, "Kevin Grittner", 14:25
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 14:22
- [HACKERS] Going, going, GUCs!, David Fetter, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Bruce Momjian, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Tom Lane, 12:27
- [HACKERS] OpenACS vs Postgres, Andrew Dunstan, 12:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Magnus Hagander, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Pavel Stehule, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Robert Haas, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 12:11
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Smith, 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, David Christensen, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Magnus Hagander, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Magnus Hagander, 12:00
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, "Kevin Grittner", 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Merlin Moncure, 11:53
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Tom Lane, 11:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, David Fetter, 11:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 11:17
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Andrew Dunstan, 11:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Tom Lane, 11:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Tom Lane, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Dimitri Fontaine, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Robert Haas, 10:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, "Kevin Grittner", 09:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 09:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 08:42
- Re: [HACKERS] ProcessUtility_hook, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 06:58
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Peter Eisentraut, 05:54
- [HACKERS] ProcessUtility_hook, Itagaki Takahiro, 05:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, pausing recovery, Simon Riggs, 04:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, pausing recovery, Simon Riggs, 04:43
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, marcin mank, 04:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Magnus Hagander, 03:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 03:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, pausing recovery, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Magnus Hagander, 03:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Magnus Hagander, 02:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Bruce Momjian, 02:21
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Itagaki Takahiro, 02:18
- Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Bruce Momjian, 01:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Peter Eisentraut, 01:43
- [HACKERS] UTF8 with BOM support in psql, Itagaki Takahiro, 01:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Bruce Momjian, 01:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Bruce Momjian, 01:22
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Smith, 00:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 00:08
October 19, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Jeff Davis, 23:05
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, "Kevin Grittner", 22:22
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Jeff Janes, 22:21
- [HACKERS] Add a pgstat config column to pg_database, so this, entire thing can be enabled/disabled on a per db basis, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 22:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Tom Lane, 22:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, "Marc G. Fournier", 21:55
- [HACKERS] SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)), KaiGai Kohei, 21:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Aidan Van Dyk, 20:37
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Jeff Davis, 20:34
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Robert Haas, 20:29
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Stark, 19:39
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Stark, 19:29
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Tom Lane, 19:21
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, marcin mank, 19:04
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Andrew Dunstan, 18:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Tom Lane, 18:45
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Andrew Gierth, 18:38
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Tom Lane, 18:33
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Tom Lane, 18:26
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, marcin mank, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, marcin mank, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:54
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Greg Stark, 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, Robert Haas, 17:14
- [HACKERS] Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?, Ron Mayer, 17:08
- [HACKERS] per table random-page-cost?, marcin mank, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "Eric B. Ridge", 17:01
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Greg Stark, 16:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Magnus Hagander, 16:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 15:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 15:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 15:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 15:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 15:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "Eric B. Ridge", 15:12
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Zdenek Kotala, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 15:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 14:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Andrew Chernow, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Andrew Dunstan, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 14:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "Kevin Grittner", 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 13:50
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 13:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 13:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Merlin Moncure, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Pavel Stehule, 13:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "Kevin Grittner", 13:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Robert Haas, 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Andrew Dunstan, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Stephen Frost, 12:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 12:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, "David E. Wheeler", 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Alvaro Herrera, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock, Simon Riggs, 12:00
- Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock, Alvaro Herrera, 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, "Kevin Grittner", 11:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Tom Lane, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Robert Haas, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 11:36
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Stephen Frost, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Alvaro Herrera, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 11:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Stephen Frost, 10:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Stephen Frost, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 10:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 10:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Stephen Frost, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Tom Lane, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Stephen Frost, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, David Fetter, 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] foreign-key inference & join removal, Robert Haas, 09:57
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Andrew Chernow, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 08:54
- Re: [HACKERS] foreign-key inference & join removal, Alex Brasetvik, 08:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, daveg, 08:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, daveg, 08:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 08:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 07:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 07:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 07:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 07:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 07:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 07:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 06:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Peter Eisentraut, 06:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 06:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 06:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 05:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 05:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dimitri Fontaine, 05:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 05:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 05:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 05:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Andrew Dunstan, 05:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 05:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 05:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 04:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 04:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Andrew Dunstan, 04:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 04:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 04:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 04:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 04:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 04:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Pavel Stehule, 03:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 03:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Peter Eisentraut, 03:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 03:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 03:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Heikki Linnakangas, 03:01
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Zdenek Kotala, 02:35
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Zdenek Kotala, 02:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 00:21
October 18, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 23:59
- [HACKERS] foreign-key inference & join removal, Robert Haas, 21:44
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Andrew Chernow, 21:09
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 19:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Boosting cost estimates for some built-in functions, Tom Lane, 16:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 16:07
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Robert Haas, 16:05
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Tom Lane, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Robert Haas, 15:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Simon Riggs, 15:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Boosting cost estimates for some built-in functions, Robert Haas, 15:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Boosting cost estimates for some built-in functions, Simon Riggs, 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Robert Haas, 15:36
- rapidshare ecm2001 titanium torrent rapidshare download gN=cyXAzBz, ecm2001 winols cpwin rapidshare torrent, 15:24
- [HACKERS] Boosting cost estimates for some built-in functions, Tom Lane, 14:50
- [HACKERS] Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution, Tom Lane, 13:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Ron Mayer, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Tom Lane, 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Robert Haas, 07:01
October 17, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Tom Lane, 22:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Robert Haas, 21:12
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Tom Lane, 21:08
- Re: [HACKERS] LATERAL, Robert Haas, 20:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Tom Lane, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Andrew Dunstan, 16:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Tom Lane, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Pavel Stehule, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Dimitri Fontaine, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Bruce Momjian, 14:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Tom Lane, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Heikki Linnakangas, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, "Marc G. Fournier", 01:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, "Marc G. Fournier", 00:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 00:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 00:28
October 16, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Greg Stark, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Greg Stark, 21:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Magnus Hagander, 20:24
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Jeff Davis, 16:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Christophe Pettus, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Guillaume Smet, 15:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 15:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Tom Lane, 15:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 15:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 15:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 15:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Greg Stark, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, David Fetter, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Robert Haas, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 13:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 13:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Tom Lane, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Deprecation, Tom Lane, 13:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Greg Stark, 13:06
- [HACKERS] Deprecation, David Fetter, 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, decibel, 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Greg Stark, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 11:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Tom Lane, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Bruce Momjian, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Stephan Szabo, 11:04
- Re: [HACKERS] operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints], Tom Lane, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Tom Lane, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Simon Riggs, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Tom Lane, 10:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Simon Riggs, 08:02
- [HACKERS] Application name patch - v2, Dave Page, 07:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 07:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Peter Eisentraut, 07:39
- Re: [HACKERS] DELETE not seeing expected rows before COPY on 8.4.1, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 07:20
- Re: [HACKERS] DELETE not seeing expected rows before COPY on 8.4.1, Robert Haas, 06:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Heikki Linnakangas, 05:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Simon Riggs, 04:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Simon Riggs, 04:21
- Re: [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Simon Riggs, 04:19
- Re: [HACKERS] operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints], Jeff Davis, 03:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, pausing recovery, Simon Riggs, 03:04
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, pausing recovery, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery_starts_paused, Simon Riggs, 01:00
October 15, 2009
- [HACKERS] DELETE not seeing expected rows before COPY on 8.4.1, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 23:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 22:13
- [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 is closed, Robert Haas, 21:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Robert Haas, 21:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 21:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Robert Haas, 21:23
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Robert Haas, 21:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Itagaki Takahiro, 21:14
- Re: [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Tom Lane, 19:58
- Re: [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Alvaro Herrera, 19:53
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery_starts_paused, Heikki Linnakangas, 18:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 18:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), "Kevin Grittner", 17:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Dimitri Fontaine, 17:43
- Re: [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Tom Lane, 17:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Ron Mayer, 17:40
- [HACKERS] inefficient use of relation extension?, Alvaro Herrera, 17:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 14:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 14:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 14:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, David Fetter, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 13:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 13:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Josh Berkus, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Tom Lane, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 13:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Josh Berkus, 13:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Ron Mayer, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 12:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 11:37
- Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN BUFFERS, Robert Haas, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN BUFFERS, Tom Lane, 11:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Robert Haas, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Tom Lane, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 10:50
- Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN BUFFERS, Robert Haas, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Pavel Stehule, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Tom Lane, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 10:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 09:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Kevin Grittner", 09:49
- Re: [HACKERS] visual c++ compile error when included spi.h and trigger.h, Peter Eisentraut, 09:07
- Re: [HACKERS] ECPG: store own copy of the prepared statement name, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 07:49
- Re: [HACKERS] ECPG: store own copy of the prepared statement name, Michael Meskes, 06:21
- [HACKERS] Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP), Itagaki Takahiro, 05:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby status, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 04:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby status, Simon Riggs, 03:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 03:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE, Simon Riggs, 03:19
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:27
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 01:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE, Itagaki Takahiro, 00:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, David Fetter, 00:13
October 14, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Andrew Dunstan, 23:51
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 23:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 22:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Andrew Dunstan, 22:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Robert Haas, 22:13
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Robert Haas, 22:10
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Robert Haas, 21:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Robert Haas, 21:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Itagaki Takahiro, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, KaiGai Kohei, 21:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Robert Haas, 21:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), KaiGai Kohei, 21:21
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Robert Haas, 21:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Tom Lane, 21:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Itagaki Takahiro, 21:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363), Robert Haas, 21:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 21:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Itagaki Takahiro, 20:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Robert Haas, 20:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 20:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Robert Haas, 20:46
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Robert Haas, 20:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Inappropriate failure conditions in foreign_data regression test, Alvaro Herrera, 19:36
- Re: [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Simon Riggs, 18:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Stephen Frost, 18:44
- Re: [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Tom Lane, 18:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 18:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 18:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 18:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 18:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 18:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 18:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 18:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, David Fetter, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Tom Lane, 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Peter Eisentraut, 18:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 18:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 18:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Josh Berkus, 17:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Kevin Grittner", 17:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Kevin Grittner", 17:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 17:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, David Fetter, 17:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Josh Berkus, 17:28
- Re: [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Peter Eisentraut, 17:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 17:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Andrew Dunstan, 17:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, David Fetter, 17:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Tom Lane, 16:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Kevin Grittner", 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 16:25
- [HACKERS] Could regexp_matches be immutable?, Rod Taylor, 16:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 16:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Mark Mielke, 15:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 15:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 14:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Greg Stark, 14:42
- Re: [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Tom Lane, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Alvaro Herrera, 14:06
- [HACKERS] What does this configure warning mean?, Simon Riggs, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, "Eric B. Ridge", 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Tom Lane, 13:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 13:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Magnus Hagander, 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 12:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Magnus Hagander, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, "Eric B. Ridge", 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 12:37
- [HACKERS] ECPG: store own copy of the prepared statement name, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] alpha 2 release notes, Jeff Davis, 12:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Tom Lane, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Robert Haas, 11:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 11:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Marko Kreen, 11:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Andrew Dunstan, 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 10:42
- [HACKERS] alpha 2 release notes, Peter Eisentraut, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 10:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Tom Lane, 09:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, xlog_xact_assignment and unreported subxids., Simon Riggs, 07:50
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, xlog_xact_assignment and unreported subxids., Heikki Linnakangas, 07:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Itagaki Takahiro, 04:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 03:27
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 01:34
October 13, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Tom Lane, 22:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Greg Smith, 17:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 17:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Tom Lane, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 16:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Jaime Casanova, 16:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Robert Haas, 15:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Jeff Davis, 14:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Dave Page, 13:53
- Re: [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Josh Berkus, 13:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 13:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Tom Lane, 13:24
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL Standard Committee, Josh Berkus, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Greg Smith, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Jaime Casanova, 13:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Robert Haas, 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Andres Freund, 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Dave Page, 12:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 12:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Kris Jurka, 12:30
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Dimitri Fontaine, 12:30
- [HACKERS] Wire protocol docs, Dave Page, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Andrew Dunstan, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Tom Lane, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Tom Lane, 11:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Andrew Dunstan, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Alvaro Herrera, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Andrew Dunstan, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Client application name, Alvaro Herrera, 11:06
- [HACKERS] Client application name, Dave Page, 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Tom Lane, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, "Kevin Grittner", 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] missing entry in GucSource_Names, Alvaro Herrera, 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Bruce Momjian, 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, "Kevin Grittner", 10:14
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 09:57
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL Standard Committee, Peter Eisentraut, 06:28
- [HACKERS] SQL Standard Committee, Simon Riggs, 05:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Simon Riggs, 04:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE, Simon Riggs, 04:22
- Re: [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Peter Eisentraut, 04:18
- [HACKERS] missing entry in GucSource_Names, Jeff Davis, 02:31
- Re: [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Josh Berkus, 01:38
- Re: [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Itagaki Takahiro, 01:28
- Re: [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Jeff Davis, 01:22
- [HACKERS] transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation, Josh Berkus, 01:13
October 12, 2009
- [HACKERS] Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:39
- Re: [HACKERS] CTE bug?, Tom Lane, 21:48
- [HACKERS] CTE bug?, David Fetter, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Brendan Jurd, 21:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 21:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2350), KaiGai Kohei, 21:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:13
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Tom Lane, 19:45
- [HACKERS] Feature Request: "generate_series(DATE, DATE)" and "generate_series(DATE, DATE, INT)", Tim Landscheidt, 18:44
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Tom Lane, 16:41
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Jaime Casanova, 16:12
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES, Andrew Dunstan, 15:41
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Tom Lane, 15:29
- Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Simon Riggs, 14:51
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Tom Lane, 14:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Merlin Moncure, 14:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Tom Lane, 13:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, David Fetter, 12:45
- [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual seems a tad broken, Tom Lane, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Robert Haas, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Hans-Juergen Schoenig -- PostgreSQL, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Bruce Momjian, 11:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Teodor Sigaev, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 09:13
- [HACKERS] Hot Standby and 64+ subxids (was COPY enhancements), Simon Riggs, 09:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 02:22
October 11, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2350), Stephen Frost, 22:46
- Re: [HACKERS] man pages, David Fetter, 21:36
- Re: [HACKERS] man pages, Tom Lane, 21:18
- Re: [HACKERS] man pages, Alvaro Herrera, 19:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 16:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Tom Lane, 16:16
- Re: [HACKERS] man pages, Andrew Chernow, 15:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Robert Haas, 15:17
- [HACKERS] man pages, David Fetter, 15:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Tom Lane, 14:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Markus Wanner, 13:52
- [HACKERS] Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?, Tom Lane, 12:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Idle connection timeout, Tatsuo Ishii, 02:25
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09: how do we close this one out?, "David E. Wheeler", 01:37
October 10, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09: how do we close this one out?, Robert Haas, 22:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Boszormenyi Zoltan, 14:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Tom Lane, 10:01
- imovel 0xx27 3084-5709 Jardim camburi apartamento apto 3 quartos 3qts em jardim camburi 3822712736, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 09:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Idle connection timeout, Dimitri Fontaine, 08:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 04:42
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Jaime Casanova, 03:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Magnus Hagander, 01:54
October 09, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 22:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 20:49
- [HACKERS] Looking for funding, Bruce Momjian, 19:58
- Re: [HACKERS] one line comment style, Bruce Momjian, 17:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, "Kevin Grittner", 17:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Peter Eisentraut, 17:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Peter Eisentraut, 17:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Bruce Momjian, 16:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Andrew Dunstan, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Oleg Bartunov, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Markus Wanner, 14:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Markus Wanner, 14:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Bruce Momjian, 14:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Andrew Dunstan, 14:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Robert Haas, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Bruce Momjian, 13:21
- [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints, Bruce Momjian, 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Michael Meskes, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 09:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Tom Lane, 09:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 07:47
- Re: [HACKERS] how to use eclipse when debugging postgreSQL backend, Greg Smith, 07:11
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Hannu Krosing, 05:10
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 02:29
October 08, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 22:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Jeff Davis, 20:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 19:53
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 19:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Peter Eisentraut, 19:23
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 19:15
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Bruce Momjian, 18:48
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Bruce Momjian, 18:38
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Andrew Dunstan, 18:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 18:24
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Bruce Momjian, 18:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 18:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 17:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Peter Eisentraut, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 17:21
- [HACKERS] Anyone want to defend EXEC_TUPLECOUNT stuff?, Tom Lane, 17:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 17:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 17:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 16:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 16:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 16:13
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands, Greg Smith, 16:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 16:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 15:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Alvaro Herrera, 15:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 15:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Jeff Davis, 15:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 15:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Dimitri Fontaine, 15:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Tom Lane, 15:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 14:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Jeff Davis, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Alvaro Herrera, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 14:52
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 14:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 13:58
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 13:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 13:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, "Joshua D. Drake", 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 13:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Greg Smith, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Tom Lane, 12:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, "David E. Wheeler", 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 12:50
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, "Kevin Grittner", 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 12:47
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 12:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, "David E. Wheeler", 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Tom Lane, 12:30
- Re: [HACKERS] one line comment style, Alvaro Herrera, 12:29
- Re: [HACKERS] one line comment style, Tom Lane, 12:26
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 12:21
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, David Fetter, 12:15
- [HACKERS] one line comment style, Dan Colish, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 11:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Merlin Moncure, 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 11:36
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 11:33
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 11:32
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Alvaro Herrera, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 11:01
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Zdenek Kotala, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Peter Eisentraut, 10:25
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, "Kevin Grittner", 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Tom Lane, 09:58
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 09:42
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 08:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 08:40
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Dimitri Fontaine, 08:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Robert Haas, 07:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 07:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Boszormenyi Zoltan, 07:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 07:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Robert Haas, 06:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Robert Haas, 06:44
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 06:43
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:28
- [HACKERS] PROPOSAL: Typmods for functions, Pavel Stehule, 04:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 03:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Tom Lane, 00:43
October 07, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Robert Haas, 23:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 23:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Heikki Linnakangas, 23:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Heikki Linnakangas, 23:11
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 23:09
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Tom Lane, 23:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Jeff Janes, 22:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Jeff Janes, 22:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 22:41
- Re: [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, Andrew Chernow, 22:31
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 22:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Andrew Dunstan, 22:07
- [HACKERS] postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?, u235sentinel, 21:48
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 21:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Robert Haas, 21:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing framework.., Michael Renner, 20:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, "David E. Wheeler", 20:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing framework.., Greg Smith, 20:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Jeff Janes, 20:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Alvaro Herrera, 20:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 20:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, "Joshua D. Drake", 20:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Greg Smith, 20:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Kiswono Prayogo, 20:06
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 19:52
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 19:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 19:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Robert Haas, 19:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 18:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 18:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 18:25
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make it possibly to specify GUC params per user and per database., Alvaro Herrera, 18:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 18:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Brendan Jurd, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 17:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 17:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 17:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 17:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Jaime Casanova, 17:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, "Brad T. Sliger", 17:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Jaime Casanova, 17:16
- [HACKERS] Writeable CTEs and side effects, Marko Tiikkaja, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Tom Lane, 16:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Chris Browne, 15:55
- [HACKERS] Performance testing framework.., Michael Renner, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Alvaro Herrera, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Greg Smith, 14:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, "David E. Wheeler", 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 13:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, "David E. Wheeler", 13:28
- [HACKERS] Scaling up deferred unique checks and the after trigger queue, Dean Rasheed, 13:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, Alvaro Herrera, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Joshua Tolley, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, "David E. Wheeler", 12:18
- [HACKERS] Concurrency testing, David Fetter, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 11:45
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 11:43
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 11:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Alvaro Herrera, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Joshua Tolley, 11:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock error in INSERT statements, Csaba Nagy, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock error in INSERT statements, Robert Haas, 10:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Andrew Dunstan, 10:55
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Andrew Dunstan, 10:45
- [HACKERS] Deadlock error in INSERT statements, Gnanam, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Tom Lane, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Alvaro Herrera, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 09:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Dimitri Fontaine, 09:33
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Andrew Dunstan, 09:28
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 09:05
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Robert Haas, 07:07
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Simon Riggs, 06:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Noah Misch, 05:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Peter Eisentraut, 04:23
- [HACKERS] Feature Suggestion: PL/Js, Kiswono Prayogo, 04:00
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Greg Smith, 03:17
October 06, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:28
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, KaiGai Kohei, 21:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09, Fujii Masao, 21:36
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 21:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Jeff Janes, 20:29
- rapidshare ecm2001 torrent rapidshare download y>W!Uz+_q^, ecm2001 winols cpwin rapidshare torrent, 18:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Peter Eisentraut, 16:23
- Re: [HACKERS] doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH, Peter Eisentraut, 16:00
- Re: [HACKERS] doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH, Peter Eisentraut, 15:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 14:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 13:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Bernd Helmle, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH, Tom Lane, 12:56
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Alvaro Herrera, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH, Alvaro Herrera, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 12:35
- [HACKERS] doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH, Tom Lane, 12:24
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, Tom Lane, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Csaba Nagy, 11:48
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 11:44
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Jaime Casanova, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Tom Lane, 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Robert Haas, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Tom Lane, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, KaiGai Kohei, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Alvaro Herrera, 10:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Alvaro Herrera, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Robert Haas, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Jaime Casanova, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Alvaro Herrera, 10:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Alvaro Herrera, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, Tom Lane, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, KaiGai Kohei, 10:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Tom Lane, 10:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09, Alvaro Herrera, 09:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Petr Jelinek, 08:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32, Magnus Hagander, 08:09
- [HACKERS] Patch: create or replace language, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum", 07:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 05:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09, Fujii Masao, 04:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, KaiGai Kohei, 04:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 03:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 03:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 02:54
October 05, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, KaiGai Kohei, 23:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Greg Stark, 23:34
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Tom Lane, 23:26
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Jaime Casanova, 23:08
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 22:55
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311), KaiGai Kohei, 22:32
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Largeobject access controls, KaiGai Kohei, 22:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Andrew Gierth, 21:56
- [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09: how do we close this one out?, Robert Haas, 21:34
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Joe Conway, 21:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?, Fujii Masao, 21:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest), Robert Haas, 21:03
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Robert Haas, 20:48
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 20:15
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Brendan Jurd, 19:50
- Re: [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Tom Lane, 19:24
- [HACKERS] moving system catalogs to another tablespace, Jaime Casanova, 19:18
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 18:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 18:48
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?, Heikki Linnakangas, 18:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 18:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311), Stephen Frost, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Brendan Jurd, 17:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311), Robert Haas, 16:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Tom Lane, 16:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Tom Lane, 15:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 15:34
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Joe Conway, 14:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Josh Berkus, 14:58
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Tom Lane, 14:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 14:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 14:23
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Joe Conway, 13:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Josh Berkus, 13:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Josh Berkus, 13:17
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Josh Berkus, 13:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Stephen Frost, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, "Kevin Grittner", 12:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Pavel Stehule, 11:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Dan Colish, 11:37
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Alvaro Herrera, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Dan Colish, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Martijn van Oosterhout, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Tom Lane, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 10:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Tom Lane, 10:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Tom Lane, 10:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Martijn van Oosterhout, 10:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Andrew Gierth, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Tom Lane, 09:49
- [HACKERS] first-draft patch for aggregate ORDER BY, Andrew Gierth, 09:36
- Re: [HACKERS] commented out para in docs, "Kevin Grittner", 09:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Inappropriate failure conditions in foreign_data regression test, Martin Pihlak, 09:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Bruce Momjian, 08:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 08:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Boszormenyi Zoltan, 08:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 07:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 07:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 06:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 06:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Dimitri Fontaine, 06:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 05:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 05:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, KaiGai Kohei, 04:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Bernd Helmle, 04:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Bernd Helmle, 04:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 04:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Simon Riggs, 04:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, KaiGai Kohei, 03:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 03:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Peter Eisentraut, 02:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Peter Eisentraut, 02:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Jeff Janes, 02:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Itagaki Takahiro, 01:24
October 04, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Robert Haas, 23:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Itagaki Takahiro, 23:22
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Tom Lane, 23:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, KaiGai Kohei, 23:15
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Itagaki Takahiro, 23:12
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Tom Lane, 22:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Robert Haas, 22:46
- [HACKERS] dblink memory leak, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:46
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?, Fujii Masao, 22:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Tom Lane, 22:13
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Emmanuel Cecchet, 22:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Tom Lane, 22:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Alvaro Herrera, 22:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Tom Lane, 21:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Robert Haas, 21:37
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES, Itagaki Takahiro, 21:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Dan Colish, 21:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Alvaro Herrera, 20:54
- [HACKERS] Making hash indexes worthwhile, Jeff Janes, 20:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Robert Haas, 20:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, "David E. Wheeler", 20:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Itagaki Takahiro, 20:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Stephen Frost, 18:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, "Larry Rosenman", 18:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 18:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Robert Haas, 18:15
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Selena Deckelmann, 17:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 16:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Josh Berkus, 16:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Peter Eisentraut, 16:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest), Jeff Janes, 16:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Pavel Stehule, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Robert Haas, 16:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 15:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 15:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Dan Colish, 15:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 15:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Andrew Dunstan, 15:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Dan Colish, 15:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Josh Berkus, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Pavel Stehule, 14:48
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Josh Berkus, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, Josh Berkus, 14:42
- [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal, David Fetter, 13:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY enhancements, Jeff Davis, 13:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 13:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, David Fetter, 13:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 13:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 12:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Tom Lane, 11:47
- Re: [HACKERS] taking a stab at agg(foo ORDER BY bar), Tom Lane, 11:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES, Khee Chin, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 09:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 08:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 08:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 07:55
- [HACKERS] taking a stab at agg(foo ORDER BY bar), Andrew Gierth, 04:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 03:18
- [HACKERS] Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG", Noah Misch, 02:00
October 03, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Joe Conway, 22:47
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES, Andrew Dunstan, 21:24
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Robert Haas, 20:54
- Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5, Robert Haas, 20:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest), Mark Kirkwood, 19:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest), Mark Kirkwood, 19:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Bruce Momjian, 19:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 13:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 12:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, "Kevin Grittner", 11:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Tom Lane, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings, Bernd Helmle, 07:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 05:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Peter Eisentraut, 04:26
- [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance, Peter Eisentraut, 02:45
- Re: [HACKERS] clang's static checker report., Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 02:27
- ECPG dynamic cursorname patch revised and split Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 01:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting the red out (of the buildfarm), Tom Lane, 00:42
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Andrew Gierth, 00:20
October 02, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Bruce Momjian, 23:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly, daveg, 22:57
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Robert Haas, 21:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, "Brad T. Sliger", 20:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Bruce Momjian, 18:56
- 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?, shakahshakah@xxxxxxxxx, 18:30
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server, Bruce Momjian, 18:18
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server, Jim Cox, 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server, Bruce Momjian, 18:11
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server, Tom Lane, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server, Bruce Momjian, 18:07
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 16:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 16:29
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, decibel, 15:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Triggers on columns, Peter Eisentraut, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Bruce Momjian, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, "David E. Wheeler", 14:42
- Re: [HACKERS] LIMIT 1 == EXISTS optimization?, Tom Lane, 14:38
- [HACKERS] remove useless set of active snap, Alvaro Herrera, 14:16
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Bruce Momjian, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Pavel Stehule, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, "David E. Wheeler", 13:34
- [HACKERS] Inappropriate failure conditions in foreign_data regression test, Tom Lane, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Alvaro Herrera, 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Stephen Frost, 13:03
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Tom Lane, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, "David E. Wheeler", 12:47
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Alvaro Herrera, 12:43
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Tom Lane, 12:39
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, "David E. Wheeler", 11:55
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Tom Lane, 11:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, "David E. Wheeler", 11:43
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Robert Haas, 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, "David E. Wheeler", 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Bruce Momjian, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Tom Lane, 11:19
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Bruce Momjian, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] latest hstore patch, Bruce Momjian, 11:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 11:04
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Tom Lane, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly, Alvaro Herrera, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 10:27
- [HACKERS] commented out para in docs, Andrew Dunstan, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 10:03
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Michael Meskes, 09:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 08:40
- Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings, Bernd Helmle, 08:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 07:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Roger Leigh, 07:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 06:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Marko Tiikkaja, 06:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 06:01
- Re: [HACKERS] "make install" now tries to build the documentation, Peter Eisentraut, 05:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 05:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Jeff Davis, 04:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 04:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 03:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 03:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:04
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Simon Riggs, 02:53
- Re: [HACKERS] hstore crasesh on 64bit Sparc, Zdenek Kotala, 02:03
October 01, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, David Fetter, 22:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING, Robert Haas, 22:48
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Robert Haas, 22:03
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, KaiGai Kohei, 22:02
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Robert Haas, 21:26
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Robert Haas, 21:20
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, KaiGai Kohei, 21:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Robert Haas, 21:18
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Robert Haas, 20:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Alvaro Herrera, 20:55
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 20:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Alvaro Herrera, 20:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review), Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 20:32
- Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, "David E. Wheeler", 19:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly, daveg, 19:51
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 18:49
- [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership, Tom Lane, 18:42
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 18:07
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Dimitri Fontaine, 18:02
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 17:23
- Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings, Alvaro Herrera, 17:22
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Robert Haas, 17:18
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Robert Haas, 17:09
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings, Bernd Helmle, 17:07
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 16:47
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Robert Haas, 16:46
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 16:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, daveg, 15:56
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 15:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, daveg, 15:40
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Heikki Linnakangas, 15:23
- Re: [HACKERS] "make install" now tries to build the documentation, Alvaro Herrera, 15:17
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 15:05
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 14:55
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 14:21
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Stephen Frost, 14:18
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Michael Meskes, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Stef Walter, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 13:55
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Stephen Frost, 13:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Tom Lane, 13:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] DefaultACLs, Tom Lane, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Andrew Dunstan, 13:34
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Alvaro Herrera, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Kenneth Marshall, 13:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Stephen Frost, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Tom Lane, 13:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Magnus Hagander, 13:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Tom Lane, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Magnus Hagander, 12:56
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Simon Riggs, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Simon Riggs, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Tom Lane, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, "Kevin Grittner", 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 12:31
- Re: [HACKERS] hstore crasesh on 64bit Sparc, Tom Lane, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Simon Riggs, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Tom Lane, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Michael Meskes, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Tom Lane, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] FSM search modes, Alvaro Herrera, 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Robert Haas, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 11:07
- [HACKERS] hstore crasesh on 64bit Sparc, Zdenek Kotala, 11:05
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Alvaro Herrera, 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Alvaro Herrera, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] navigation menu for documents, Robert Haas, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 10:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, Tom Lane, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Mark Mielke, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] navigation menu for documents, Richard Huxton, 10:28
- Re: [HACKERS] navigation menu for documents, "David E. Wheeler", 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, "Kevin Grittner", 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby 0.2.1, Simon Riggs, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Pavel Stehule, 10:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Simon Riggs, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Kenneth Marshall, 10:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Magnus Hagander, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Stef Walter, 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Stef Walter, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 09:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Andrew Dunstan, 09:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, Dave Page, 08:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Rejecting weak passwords, "Albe Laurenz", 08:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Andrew Dunstan, 08:39
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Michael Meskes, 08:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Stephen Frost, 08:12
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on, Magnus Hagander, 07:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby on git, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:29
- [HACKERS] Limit allocated memory per session, daveg, 06:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 05:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:29
- Re: [HACKERS] navigation menu for documents, Richard Huxton, 04:12
- Re: [HACKERS] navigation menu for documents, Richard Huxton, 04:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues for named/mixed function notation patch, Brendan Jurd, 03:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Jaime Casanova, 01:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Magnus Hagander, 01:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Tom Lane, 00:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Tom Lane, 00:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?, Peter Eisentraut, 00:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output, Peter Eisentraut, 00:17
Privacy Policy