pgsql.hackers (date)
June 30, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Bruce Momjian, 23:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Stephen Frost, 22:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Andrew Dunstan, 22:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 22:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 21:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Stephen Frost, 21:17
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL Updates rev.2096, KaiGai Kohei, 21:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Stephen Frost, 21:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Stephen Frost, 21:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, David Fetter, 19:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, David Fetter, 18:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 17:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, David Fetter, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 16:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Nathan Boley, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Richard Huxton, 15:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 15:10
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, David Fetter, 14:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, Tom Lane, 14:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, Tom Lane, 14:46
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Josh Berkus, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Josh Berkus, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Alvaro Herrera, 14:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 14:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, Tom Lane, 14:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, Tom Lane, 14:00
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Kevin Grittner", 13:41
- Re: [HACKERS] foreign.h is not installed, Tom Lane, 13:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 13:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, Tom Lane, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 13:21
- [HACKERS] Inconsistent Errors on Row Comparisons, "David E. Wheeler", 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 13:01
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 12:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:52
- Рассылки по России, Фрося, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] dependencies for generated header files, Alvaro Herrera, 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 12:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 12:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Tom Lane, 12:04
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Kevin Grittner", 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Peter Eisentraut, 10:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Nikhil Sontakke, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, "Kevin Grittner", 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 09:35
- Re: [HACKERS] use of pg_stat_database, Merlin Moncure, 09:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Aidan Van Dyk, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Merlin Moncure, 09:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Andrew Dunstan, 09:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Aidan Van Dyk, 09:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Hello to all postgresql developers :), Dimitri Fontaine, 08:47
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Greg Stark, 08:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 08:04
- Re: [HACKERS] question about meaning of character varying without length, Andrew Dunstan, 08:02
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Greg Stark, 07:53
- Re: [HACKERS] use of pg_stat_database, "A. Kretschmer", 07:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Robert Haas, 07:22
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Lars Kanis, 06:18
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Lars Kanis, 05:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Simon Riggs, 04:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Simon Riggs, 03:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Hello to all postgresql developers :), Peter Eisentraut, 03:43
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, KaiGai Kohei, 03:13
- [HACKERS] [PATCH v3] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Jeremy Kerr, 03:08
- Re: [HACKERS] foreign.h is not installed, Peter Eisentraut, 02:51
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros, Jeremy Kerr, 02:48
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 2/2 v3] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send(), Jeremy Kerr, 02:48
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 0/2 v3] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Jeremy Kerr, 02:48
- [HACKERS] 8.5 development schedule, Peter Eisentraut, 01:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Dimitri Fontaine, 01:04
- [HACKERS] foreign.h is not installed, Itagaki Takahiro, 00:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Joshua Tolley, 00:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, David Fetter, 00:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Greg Stark, 00:17
June 29, 2009
- ООО: перерегистрация, новый порядок учреждения, Законодательные нормы об ООО, 23:53
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 23:39
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Greg Stark, 23:24
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, KaiGai Kohei, 23:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Robert Haas, 22:22
- Re: [HACKERS] How to register my function into backend?, Robert Haas, 21:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Robert Haas, 21:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 20:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Nathan Boley, 20:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Ron Mayer, 20:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Nathan Boley, 19:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Greg Stark, 19:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Greg Stark, 19:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, David Fetter, 18:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Tom Lane, 18:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Tom Lane, 18:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Simon Riggs, 16:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, David Fetter, 16:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, Nathan Boley, 16:28
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 16:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Greg Stark, 15:53
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 15:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Stephen Frost, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, Tom Lane, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Peter Hunsberger, 14:55
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 14:53
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, Bernd Helmle, 14:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Tom Lane, 14:40
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 14:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Joshua Tolley, 14:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Robert Haas, 14:21
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 14:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Tom Lane, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Josh Berkus, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Josh Berkus, 13:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore -t table concerns, Andrew Dunstan, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Andrew Dunstan, 13:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore -t table concerns, Tom Lane, 13:25
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 13:19
- [HACKERS] pg_restore -t table concerns, Mike Toews, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 13:09
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 12:55
- [HACKERS] Multi-Dimensional Histograms, David Fetter, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Tom Lane, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Lars Kanis, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Tom Lane, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Peter Eisentraut, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Tom Lane, 10:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Tom Lane, 10:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Robert Haas, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Peter Hunsberger, 09:56
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf, Lars Kanis, 09:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Richard Huxton, 09:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Peter Eisentraut, 08:48
- Разошлем, Вера, 08:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Tsutomu Yamada, 06:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Peter Eisentraut, 02:53
June 28, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] query cancel issues in contrib/dblink, Itagaki Takahiro, 23:42
- Re: [HACKERS] dependencies for generated header files, Robert Haas, 22:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, KaiGai Kohei, 19:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, David Fetter, 18:35
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Andrew Dunstan, 18:28
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 18:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Stephen Frost, 18:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, David Fetter, 17:38
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Andrew Dunstan, 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Robert Haas, 17:23
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, David Fetter, 17:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 15:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Tom Lane, 14:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 14:23
- [HACKERS] dependencies for generated header files, Robert Haas, 14:21
- Re: [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Bill Moran, 14:12
- [HACKERS] pre-proposal: permissions made easier, Jeff Davis, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Query progress indication - an implementation, Robert Haas, 13:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem building from source on Windows, "Hiroshi Saito", 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] stat() vs cygwin, Reini Urban, 09:33
June 26, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Join optimization for inheritance tables, Tom Lane, 19:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, Bernd Helmle, 18:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Andrew Dunstan", 16:37
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 16:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 16:13
- Практика разработки бизнес-плана., Светлана, 14:02
- [HACKERS] Join optimization for inheritance tables, Nedyalko Borisov, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] gettext version problem exposed by buildfarm failures on "canary", Kris Jurka, 13:05
- Re: [HACKERS] gettext version problem exposed by buildfarm failures on "canary", Kris Jurka, 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, "Andrew Dunstan", 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 11:39
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, tomas, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Dimitri Fontaine, 11:03
- Re: [HACKERS] gettext version problem exposed by buildfarm failures on "canary", Tom Lane, 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] gettext version problem exposed by buildfarm failures on "canary", "Andrew Dunstan", 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Peter Eisentraut, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] query cancel issues in contrib/dblink, Merlin Moncure, 10:00
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 09:41
- [HACKERS] gettext version problem exposed by buildfarm failures on "canary", Tom Lane, 09:34
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 08:47
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 08:12
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 08:07
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 08:03
- [HACKERS] Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms, Tsutomu Yamada, 05:07
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:16
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects, KaiGai Kohei, 00:08
June 25, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 23:20
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 22:48
- [HACKERS] query cancel issues in contrib/dblink, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 22:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 RC1 union/nested select cast bug?, Tom Lane, 20:50
- [HACKERS] PG 8.4 release will be delayed, Tom Lane, 17:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving pg_standby -l, Tom Lane, 15:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 13:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Tom Lane, 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dave Page, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor, SQLDA support, Michael Meskes, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving pg_standby -l, Simon Riggs, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Tom Lane, 10:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving pg_standby -l, Tom Lane, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Fujii Masao, 09:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Magnus Hagander, 09:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Tom Lane, 09:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Magnus Hagander, 09:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Fujii Masao, 09:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving pg_standby -l, Heikki Linnakangas, 08:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Magnus Hagander, 07:33
- [HACKERS] Resolving pg_standby -l, Simon Riggs, 06:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Simon Riggs, 06:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 05:38
- Re: [HACKERS] that picksplit debug message again, Simon Riggs, 05:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Magnus Hagander, 05:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dave Page, 05:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dave Page, 04:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:58
- [HACKERS] Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?, Fujii Masao, 00:50
June 24, 2009
- [HACKERS] array casts that worked in 8.3 no longer work, "J. Greg Davidson", 21:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 19:56
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Tom Lane, 19:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Andrew Dunstan, 18:41
- Вам нужно обратиться в банк для получения кредита?, Наташа, 18:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 18:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Jaime Casanova, 18:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Andrew Dunstan, 18:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 17:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Andrew Dunstan, 17:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 17:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Josh Berkus, 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Andrew Dunstan, 17:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Josh Berkus, 16:43
- Aluguel 3084-5709 Aluguel Jardim camburi apartamento apto 2 quartos 2qts em jardim camburi 6511110373, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 15:53
- Эффективная реклама, Иван, 12:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Peter Eisentraut, 11:44
- Счета-фактуры √ изменения от 26 мая 2009г, Бухгалтеру о счетах-фактурах , 08:12
- Кардинальное изм. Счета-фактуры, Изменения от 26 мая - счета-фактуры, 08:10
- Счета-фактуры √ Новации от 26 мая 2009г., Изменения от 26 мая - счета-фактуры, 08:09
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 07:32
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 07:23
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 07:11
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings, Peter Eisentraut, 06:07
- [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor, SQLDA support, Boszormenyi Zoltan, 05:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:59
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 01:29
- Re: [HACKERS] that picksplit debug message again, Tom Lane, 01:19
- [HACKERS] pg_listener attribute number #defines, Robert Haas, 01:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Jaime Casanova, 00:27
June 23, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 23:47
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 22:46
- [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings, Itagaki Takahiro, 22:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 22:25
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 21:05
- [HACKERS] that picksplit debug message again, Peter Eisentraut, 19:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Richard Huxton, 19:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 18:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 18:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 17:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:06
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4RC2 is available, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 17:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Extensions User Design, "David E. Wheeler", 14:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4RC2 is available, "David E. Wheeler", 11:00
- [HACKERS] 8.4RC2 is available, Tom Lane, 09:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum", 05:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Fujii Masao, 02:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 02:20
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, KaiGai Kohei, 00:24
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Andrew Dunstan, 00:11
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, David Fetter, 00:06
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, KaiGai Kohei, 00:06
June 22, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Tom Lane, 23:43
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Andrew Dunstan, 23:20
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Tom Lane, 22:45
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Robert Haas, 22:30
- Re: [HACKERS] building without perl, Tom Lane, 22:12
- [HACKERS] building without perl, Robert Haas, 22:03
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, KaiGai Kohei, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions, Tom Lane, 19:24
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 19:01
- [HACKERS] Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum", 17:53
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:40
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:06
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Smith, 16:33
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 16:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 16:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Dimitri Fontaine, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, David Fetter, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Markus Wanner, 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Andrew Dunstan, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, Tom Lane, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:24
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, David Fetter, 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stephen Frost, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stephen Frost, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 10:27
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:20
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, Peter Eisentraut, 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 10:16
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, David Fetter, 09:24
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 04:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Fujii Masao, 03:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Missing Docs for MOVE direction?, Peter Eisentraut, 03:13
- Re: [HACKERS] rc tarball built with older flex version?, "Marc G. Fournier", 02:27
- Re: [HACKERS] rc tarball built with older flex version?, Peter Eisentraut, 02:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, tomas, 01:09
- Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, KaiGai Kohei, 01:00
June 21, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Missing Docs for MOVE direction?, "David E. Wheeler", 20:15
- [HACKERS] Missing Docs for MOVE direction?, "David E. Wheeler", 20:07
- Re: [HACKERS] rc tarball built with older flex version?, "Marc G. Fournier", 17:17
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 14:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 14:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, David Fetter, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 13:58
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 13:42
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Stark, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Robert Haas, 12:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Robert Haas, 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Robert Haas, 11:16
- Оптимизация налогов, Налоговое планирование, 08:03
- Разошлем рекламу, Юрий, 07:43
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 06:48
- покупка у физлиц ТМЦ, ИП на ЕНВД или УСН (в т.ч. на патенте) √ как использовать, Новые варианты., 05:37
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 05:17
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 04:53
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 04:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 04:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Heikki Linnakangas, 03:42
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Smith, 02:45
June 20, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 15:40
- Re: [HACKERS] array_agg versus repeated execution of aggregate final functions, Tom Lane, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] array_agg versus repeated execution of aggregate final functions, Merlin Moncure, 13:38
- [HACKERS] array_agg versus repeated execution of aggregate final functions, Tom Lane, 13:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Smith, 12:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Stark, 07:46
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 07:15
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Stark, 07:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Markus Wanner, 05:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 04:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 04:22
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Smith, 02:53
June 19, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Greg Smith, 22:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Simon Riggs, 19:03
- Re: [HACKERS] cassert: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (134217727), Tom Lane, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] cassert: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (134217727), Merlin Moncure, 17:30
- [HACKERS] cassert: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (134217727), Merlin Moncure, 17:27
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Josh Berkus, 16:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Alvaro Herrera, 16:36
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Peter Eisentraut, 15:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 15:06
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Kenneth Marshall, 13:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Tom Lane, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 11:51
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Peter Eisentraut, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Peter Eisentraut, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 11:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Marko Kreen, 09:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Andrew Dunstan, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PSQLException: FATAL: semctl(9335088, 3, SETVAL, 0) failed, Tom Lane, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Kenneth Marshall, 08:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Greg Smith, 03:17
- [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?, KaiGai Kohei, 00:03
June 18, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 20:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 19:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Kenneth Marshall, 19:47
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 19:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 19:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Greg Stark, 18:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 18:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 18:33
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator mention in documentation, Bruce Momjian, 17:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Tom Lane, 17:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Bruce Momjian, 17:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, "Kevin Grittner", 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Tom Lane, 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 17:03
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Tom Lane, 16:15
- [HACKERS] 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 16:15
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Tom Lane, 15:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Mark Mielke, 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] rc tarball built with older flex version?, Tom Lane, 14:01
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, "Kevin Grittner", 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Tom Lane, 13:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator mention in documentation, Greg Smith, 13:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Uninstallation error, genie . japo, 12:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Uninstallation error, Alvaro Herrera, 11:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Uninstallation error, Peter Eisentraut, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Alvaro Herrera, 10:58
- [HACKERS] rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages, Peter Eisentraut, 10:54
- [HACKERS] rc tarball built with older flex version?, Peter Eisentraut, 10:49
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release notes "Recursive Joins", Peter Eisentraut, 10:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, "Kevin Grittner", 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 09:59
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Florian Weimer, 09:58
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator mention in documentation, Peter Eisentraut, 09:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Tom Lane, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 09:21
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 09:09
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 09:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Marko Kreen, 08:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 07:12
- Re: [HACKERS] typos in source comment, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:11
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Bernd Helmle, 05:26
- [HACKERS] typos in source comment, Fujii Masao, 05:01
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Simon Riggs, 03:33
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Peter Eisentraut, 03:21
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 03:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Pavel Golub, 02:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Heikki Linnakangas, 01:36
June 17, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, tomas, 23:01
- [HACKERS] generic explain options v3, Robert Haas, 21:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Tom Lane, 21:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Itagaki Takahiro, 20:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Tom Lane, 19:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Greg Stark, 18:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Greg Stark, 18:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Andrew Dunstan, 17:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Andrew Dunstan, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, "Kevin Grittner", 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Alvaro Herrera, 15:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Robert Haas, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Greg Stark, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Tom Lane, 13:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Andrew Dunstan, 13:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Alvaro Herrera, 13:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Andrew Dunstan, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Robert Haas, 13:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Robert Haas, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, "Kevin Grittner", 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Greg Stark, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Greg Stark, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, "David E. Wheeler", 12:37
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Guillaume Smet, 12:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Alvaro Herrera, 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql error message, Tom Lane, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Tom Lane, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Named transaction, Tom Lane, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 11:06
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Stephen Frost, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Tom Lane, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Peter Eisentraut, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Stephen Frost, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 10:42
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Stephen Frost, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 10:31
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 10:27
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Tom Lane, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Stephen Frost, 10:09
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Peter Eisentraut, 09:44
- [HACKERS] plpgsql error message, Peter Eisentraut, 09:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Peter Eisentraut, 09:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Andrew Dunstan, 08:52
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 08:41
- [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:29
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 06:55
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Heikki Linnakangas, 05:51
- [HACKERS] Named transaction, Pavel Golub, 05:31
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 05:31
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Fujii Masao, 03:36
- Re: [HACKERS] concurrent COPY performance, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 00:39
June 16, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] concurrent COPY performance, "Kevin Grittner", 18:14
- Re: [HACKERS] concurrent COPY performance, Andrew Dunstan, 17:49
- Re: [HACKERS] concurrent COPY performance, Merlin Moncure, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 17:26
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 13:53
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 13:01
- [HACKERS] concurrent COPY performance, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 12:47
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 12:04
- [HACKERS] GRANT ON ALL IN schema, Petr Jelinek, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 11:49
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Greg Stark, 11:45
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Czichy, Thoralf (NSN - FI/Helsinki)", 11:22
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 11:19
- [HACKERS] Uninstallation error, genie . japo, 11:16
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Tom Lane, 11:05
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 11:04
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Greg Stark, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 10:31
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Tom Lane, 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 09:45
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 09:30
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 09:23
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 09:22
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Andrew Dunstan, 09:09
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 09:04
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 08:53
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Greg Stark, 08:47
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 08:46
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Greg Stark, 08:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 08:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Greg Stark, 08:38
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Greg Stark, 08:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 08:03
- [HACKERS] Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender, Fujii Masao, 07:50
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andres Freund, 07:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:18
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 06:30
- Re: [HACKERS] question about meaning of character varying without length, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 05:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:12
- Re: [HACKERS] How to embed postgresql?, Josh Berkus, 01:42
- Re: [HACKERS] change do_tup_output to take Datum arguments rather than cstring, Robert Haas, 00:58
- Re: [HACKERS] question about meaning of character varying without length, Robert Haas, 00:47
- Re: [HACKERS] How to embed postgresql?, Robert Haas, 00:31
- Re: [HACKERS] question about meaning of character varying without length, Robert Haas, 00:29
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 00:24
June 15, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Stephen Frost, 22:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Should mdxxx functions(e.g. mdread, mdwrite, mdsync etc) PANIC instead of ERROR when I/O failed?, Jacky Leng, 22:12
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 21:51
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Robert Haas, 21:28
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen, Jeremy Kerr, 21:04
- Re: [HACKERS] char() overhead on read-only workloads not so insignifcant as the docs claim it is..., Jeremy Kerr, 20:43
- Re: [HACKERS] char() overhead on read-only workloads not so insignifcant as the docs claim it is..., Alvaro Herrera, 19:58
- Анализ действующих законодательных норм об ООО и норм, вступающих в силу, ООО: перерегистрация, 19:54
- Re: [HACKERS] What does log_destination = csvlog mean?, Bruce Momjian, 15:20
- Re: [HACKERS] What does log_destination = csvlog mean?, Andrew Dunstan, 15:14
- [HACKERS] What does log_destination = csvlog mean?, Bruce Momjian, 14:58
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Alvaro Herrera, 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)", 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, David Fetter, 12:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Tom Lane, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, David Fetter, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Should mdxxx functions(e.g. mdread, mdwrite, mdsync etc) PANIC instead of ERROR when I/O failed?, Tom Lane, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 08:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Should mdxxx functions(e.g. mdread, mdwrite, mdsync etc) PANIC instead of ERROR when I/O failed?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 07:26
- Should mdxxx functions(e.g. mdread, mdwrite, mdsync etc) PANIC instead of ERROR when I/O failed?, Jacky Leng, 04:41
June 14, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 21:11
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING, David Fetter, 18:24
- [HACKERS] 8.4 release notes "Recursive Joins", "Erik Rijkers", 16:31
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 13:04
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 13:02
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING, Petr Jelinek, 11:59
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 08:57
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Dave Page, 08:08
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Pavel Stehule, 07:12
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Dave Page, 04:46
- Re: [HACKERS] postgresql regular expr bug?, Pavel Stehule, 03:35
- Re: [HACKERS] postgresql regular expr bug?, hubert depesz lubaczewski, 03:25
- Re: [HACKERS] postgresql regular expr bug?, "Stephen J. Butler", 02:28
- [HACKERS] postgresql regular expr bug?, Pavel Stehule, 02:15
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 01:03
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 00:57
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 00:48
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 00:27
June 13, 2009
- Как выявить внешнего контрагента-однодневку, незаконная деятельность. , 22:06
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 19:42
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 19:23
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Tom Lane, 18:40
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Bernd Helmle, 18:33
- легальная альтернатива обналичиванию, черная зарплата, 16:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Robert Haas, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Tom Lane, 14:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Greg Stark, 13:23
- [HACKERS] Suppressing occasional failures in copy2 regression test, Tom Lane, 12:27
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, kris, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] some of the datatypes only support hashing, while others only support sorting, Tom Lane, 11:10
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 09:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 09:33
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Peter Eisentraut, 09:13
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 09:08
- [HACKERS] char() overhead on read-only workloads not so insignifcant as the docs claim it is..., Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 06:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING, David Fetter, 04:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: GiST extension implementation, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:11
June 12, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Fujii Masao, 23:02
- [HACKERS] some of the datatypes only support hashing, while others only support sorting, Robert Haas, 21:58
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Peter Eisentraut, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: GiST extension implementation, Tom Lane, 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Andrew Dunstan, 17:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: GiST extension implementation, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: GiST extension implementation, Tom Lane, 15:49
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Josh Berkus, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Robert Haas, 13:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] machine-readable explain output, Josh Berkus, 11:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 11:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, "Albe Laurenz", 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Shadar, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, "Kevin Grittner", 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Dave Page, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Bruce Momjian, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Tom Lane, 10:09
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, "Kevin Grittner", 09:42
- Re: [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Bruce Momjian, 09:02
- [HACKERS] port to Windows x64, Tsutomu Yamada, 08:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Merlin Moncure, 08:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, "Albe Laurenz", 07:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Shadar, 06:54
- [HACKERS] cannot update to the latest CVS sources, Fujii Masao, 04:45
- [HACKERS] generic explain options v2, Robert Haas, 00:41
- [HACKERS] explain refactoring v4, Robert Haas, 00:32
June 11, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 19:50
- [HACKERS] Re: AlterTableCreateToastTable API still not right for pg_migrator, Bruce Momjian, 19:39
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent., Bruce Momjian, 19:22
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent., Andrew Dunstan, 19:01
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent., Tom Lane, 18:59
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent., Alvaro Herrera, 18:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent., Andrew Dunstan, 18:51
- [HACKERS] Re: AlterTableCreateToastTable API still not right for pg_migrator, Bruce Momjian, 18:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Tom Lane, 18:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 18:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Greg Stark, 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Tom Lane, 16:19
- [HACKERS] AlterTableCreateToastTable API still not right for pg_migrator, Tom Lane, 15:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Josh Berkus, 14:35
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Merlin Moncure, 14:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 14:13
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4beta[12] set returning function fails -- was O.K. with 8.3, Tom Lane, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Tom Lane, 11:52
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH][v8.5] SE-PostgreSQL Patch Updates (r2016), "David E. Wheeler", 11:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 11:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Greg Stark, 11:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 11:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Alvaro Herrera, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 11:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Greg Stark, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Tom Lane, 11:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Shadar, 11:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 11:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, "Kevin Grittner", 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Greg Stark, 10:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 10:50
- [HACKERS] Modifying TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD and TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET?, Shadar, 10:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 10:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Merlin Moncure, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4beta[12] set returning function fails -- was O.K. with 8.3, Hitoshi Harada, 08:43
- [HACKERS] [PATCH][v8.5] SE-PostgreSQL Patch Updates (r2016), KaiGai Kohei, 02:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 01:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 01:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting error while trying to insert date with the format 'dd-month-yyyy' , 'day-mm-yyyy' etc.., Tom Lane, 00:34
June 10, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 22:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 22:30
- [HACKERS] 8.4beta[12] set returning function fails -- was O.K. with 8.3, "J. Greg Davidson", 19:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Tom Lane, 18:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Greg Stark, 18:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Tom Lane, 18:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Greg Stark, 18:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Brendan Jurd, 18:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Greg Stark, 18:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Tom Lane, 18:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, "Kevin Grittner", 18:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Bruce Momjian, 17:58
- [HACKERS] Display of foreign keys in psql, Peter Eisentraut, 17:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Greg Stark, 16:58
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 16:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Peter Eisentraut, 16:44
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 15:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 15:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 15:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 15:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Tom Lane, 15:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Peter Eisentraut, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 15:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 15:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 15:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Greg Stark, 15:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Greg Smith, 15:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 14:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 14:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 14:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 14:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Josh Berkus, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 14:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting error while trying to insert date with the format 'dd-month-yyyy' , 'day-mm-yyyy' etc.., Peter Eisentraut, 14:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 14:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Josh Berkus, 14:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Josh Berkus, 14:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 14:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 14:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Andy Colson, 14:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Andrew Dunstan, 14:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Merlin Moncure, 14:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Josh Berkus, 14:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Josh Berkus, 14:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Magnus Hagander, 13:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PlannerInfo Structure, Tom Lane, 13:45
- [HACKERS] Resolving 8.4 open items, Tom Lane, 13:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 13:40
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, "Kevin Grittner", 12:01
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 12:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, "Albe Laurenz", 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 11:33
- ligue agora 0xx27 3084-5709 apartamento apto 2 quartos 2qts em jardim camburi 8237524731, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 11:00
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 10:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Getting error while trying to insert date with the format 'dd-month-yyyy' , 'day-mm-yyyy' etc.., Tom Lane, 10:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Andy Colson, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 09:45
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 09:43
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Simon Riggs, 09:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Merlin Moncure, 09:15
- [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send(), Jeremy Kerr, 09:00
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH 2/2] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send(), Jeremy Kerr, 08:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 07:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Gregory Stark, 07:38
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCH 2/2] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send(), Marko Kreen, 07:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 06:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, "Albe Laurenz", 03:38
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Fujii Masao, 02:33
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/2] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros, Jeremy Kerr, 02:31
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 2/2] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send(), Jeremy Kerr, 02:31
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 0/2] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, v2, Jeremy Kerr, 02:31
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Simon Riggs, 02:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Andrew Dunstan, 00:12
June 09, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 23:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 23:46
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 23:40
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 23:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Tom Lane, 23:33
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 23:30
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 23:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 21:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Sergey Burladyan, 20:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 18:11
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Simon Riggs, 18:03
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Simon Riggs, 17:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Merlin Moncure, 17:38
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Tom Lane, 17:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 17:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Andrew Dunstan, 17:17
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Simon Riggs, 16:51
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Kevin Grittner", 16:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, Tom Lane, 16:27
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Tom Lane, 16:17
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 16:04
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Greg Stark, 16:03
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Kevin Grittner", 15:53
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Simon Riggs, 15:21
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 15:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Floris Bos / Maxnet, 15:14
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)", 14:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Tom Lane, 14:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 14:29
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Tom Lane, 14:26
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Simon Riggs, 14:22
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Tom Lane, 14:20
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Peter Eisentraut, 14:09
- Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Cursor with hold emits the same row more than once across commits in 8.3.7, Robert Haas, 14:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Josh Berkus, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Tom Lane, 13:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, "Kevin Grittner", 13:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Alvaro Herrera, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Cursor with hold emits the same row more than once across commits in 8.3.7, Robert Haas, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Robert Haas, 13:28
- [HACKERS] pgindent run coming, Bruce Momjian, 13:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Florian Weimer, 13:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Andrew Dunstan, 13:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Josh Berkus, 13:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Jaime Casanova, 12:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Greg Stark, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 12:41
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 12:36
- [HACKERS] Not quite a security hole in internal_in, Tom Lane, 12:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Floris Bos / Maxnet, 12:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Florian Weimer, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Simon Riggs, 12:07
- [HACKERS] page is uninitialized --- fixing, Simon Riggs, 12:00
- [HACKERS] Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX, "Albe Laurenz", 11:57
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Tom Lane, 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, gj, 11:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Tom Lane, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Floris Bos / Maxnet, 07:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, gj, 06:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Greg Stark, 04:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Richard Huxton, 04:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 03:24
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Robert Haas, 00:18
June 08, 2009
- [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2, Floris Bos / Maxnet, 20:32
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 19:34
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Robert Haas, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 16:30
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Greg Stark, 16:12
- ligue agora 0xx27 3084-5709 apartamento apto 2 quartos 2qts em jardim camburi 4166440022, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 15:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 15:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, Jaime Casanova, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Alvaro Herrera, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 14:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 14:38
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 14:29
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 14:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Simon Riggs, 13:58
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 13:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2, Josh Berkus, 13:29
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 13:25
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Robert Haas, 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 13:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 13:05
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 12:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 12:51
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 12:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 12:46
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 12:39
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 12:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Dimitri Fontaine, 11:45
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 11:31
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 11:23
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Dimitri Fontaine, 11:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:14
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Alvaro Herrera, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Dimitri Fontaine, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Alvaro Herrera, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Magnus Hagander, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 10:04
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Tom Lane, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Merlin Moncure, 09:10
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Fujii Masao, 08:56
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Mark Mielke, 08:36
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Gregory Stark, 05:45
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Fujii Masao, 05:27
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 05:10
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Ron Mayer, 04:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Magnus Hagander, 04:19
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 03:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Simple, safe hot backup and recovery, Fujii Masao, 03:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 00:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 00:16
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Tom Lane, 00:12
June 07, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Robert Haas, 20:31
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Peter Eisentraut, 16:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 16:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Robert Haas, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 15:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 15:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Josh Berkus, 15:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Peter Eisentraut, 14:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Greg Stark, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Robert Haas, 14:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 13:56
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 13:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 13:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Simon Riggs, 13:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Simon Riggs, 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 12:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Greg Stark, 12:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Tom Lane, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 11:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Simon Riggs, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 10:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Robert Haas, 08:46
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 05:02
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Nicolas Barbier, 03:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 00:11
June 06, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 23:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 22:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 22:26
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Tom Lane, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 21:23
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 19:29
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 19:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 18:18
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 16:56
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 16:30
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Andrew Dunstan, 16:05
- [HACKERS] Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples, Tom Lane, 15:44
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 15:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Josh Berkus, 15:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 14:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 14:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Josh Berkus, 14:45
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Tom Lane, 14:34
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 14:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting default_statistics_target, Mark Wong, 14:26
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Greg Stark, 14:15
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 13:59
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Mark Mielke, 13:55
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Tom Lane, 13:51
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 13:42
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 13:22
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Andrew Dunstan, 12:56
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 12:42
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Tom Lane, 12:08
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 11:41
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Markus Wanner, 11:40
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator mention in documentation, Bruce Momjian, 09:21
- Re: [HACKERS] blocking referencing system catalogs in 8.4 breaks my code, "J. Greg Davidson", 01:16
June 05, 2009
- [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment], Joe Conway, 23:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 23:45
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 22:50
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 22:10
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 21:27
- [HACKERS] explain refactoring v3, Robert Haas, 21:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, David Blewett, 20:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Unique namespace per session for temp tables?, Tom Lane, 19:15
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 18:49
- Re: [HACKERS] blocking referencing system catalogs in 8.4 breaks my code, Josh Berkus, 18:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Josh Berkus, 18:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Dimitri Fontaine, 18:11
- Re: [HACKERS] blocking referencing system catalogs in 8.4 breaks my code, Tom Lane, 17:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: GiST extension implementation, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:40
- [HACKERS] blocking referencing system catalogs in 8.4 breaks my code, "J. Greg Davidson", 16:59
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 16:19
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 16:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 16:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Tom Lane, 16:14
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Brad Nicholson, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Andrew Dunstan, 16:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Bruce Momjian, 15:50
- [HACKERS] pg_migrator issue with contrib, Brad Nicholson, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 15:33
- apartamentos apto casa 3 quartos 3qts em jardim camburi 0122746585, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 15:01
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Andrew Dunstan, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 14:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres delays function returning large set of data, Tom Lane, 14:06
- [HACKERS] movavg, David Fetter, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres delays function returning large set of data, flippo00110001, 13:03
- [HACKERS] pg_migrator mention in documentation, Bruce Momjian, 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 12:20
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Bruce Momjian, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 11:59
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 11:37
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 11:29
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Dave Page, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)", 10:28
- [HACKERS] 8.4 release schedule: RC1 next week, Tom Lane, 10:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Tom Lane, 10:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Bruce Momjian, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Andrew Dunstan, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Andrew Dunstan, 09:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Simple, safe hot backup and recovery, Bruce Momjian, 09:40
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 09:38
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)", 08:24
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 08:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 08:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, "Dickson S. Guedes", 08:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Simple, safe hot backup and recovery, Fujii Masao, 05:25
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Dave Page, 04:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Simple, safe hot backup and recovery, Fujii Masao, 04:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, Fujii Masao, 03:19
- [HACKERS] Simple, safe hot backup and recovery, Yoshinori Sano, 03:18
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 03:05
- Re: [HACKERS] postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression, Fujii Masao, 02:14
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 01:04
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Jeremy Kerr, 00:04
June 04, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Atsushi Ogawa, 23:49
- [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Jeremy Kerr, 23:23
- Re: [HACKERS] display previous query string of idle-in-transaction, Robert Haas, 22:22
- Re: [HACKERS] display previous query string of idle-in-transaction, Tatsuhito Kasahara, 21:54
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, "David E. Wheeler", 19:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Jeremy Kerr, 19:18
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Bruce Momjian, 19:10
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 18:58
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 18:10
- Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] pull raw text of a message by message-id, Alvaro Herrera, 17:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Ron Mayer, 17:20
- Построение оптимальной схемы бизнес процесса., Наташа, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] faster version of AllocSetFreeIndex for x86 architecture, Simon Riggs, 14:10
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 14:04
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Andrew Dunstan, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Dimitri Fontaine, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, "Kevin Grittner", 13:39
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Tom Lane, 13:33
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, "Kevin Grittner", 13:12
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Andrew Dunstan, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 12:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, "Dickson S. Guedes", 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Initialise perl library as documented in perl API., Tom Lane, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Robert Haas, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Simon Riggs, 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 11:32
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving the ngettext() patch, Tom Lane, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving the ngettext() patch, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE, Gevik Babakhani, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving the ngettext() patch, Tom Lane, 10:21
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Tom Lane, 10:02
- Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Greg Stark, 10:01
- Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Alvaro Herrera, 09:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE, Tom Lane, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Magnus Hagander, 09:39
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Atsushi Ogawa, 09:12
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 08:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE, Pavel Stehule, 08:42
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Magnus Hagander, 07:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)", 06:53
- [HACKERS] PANIC: corrupted item lengths, Simon Riggs, 06:48
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Dave Page, 05:49
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 05:46
- Разработка и анализ бизнес плана., Ольга, 05:33
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 05:14
- [HACKERS] Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE, Gevik Babakhani, 05:08
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 05:07
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Simon Riggs, 05:01
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Simon Riggs, 04:53
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix LOCK TABLE to eliminate the race condition that could make it, Simon Riggs, 04:38
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Greg Stark, 04:33
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 04:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "Markus Wanner", 03:50
- от 3 т.р. Москва, Иван, 02:14
- [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex, Jeremy Kerr, 01:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, Fujii Masao, 00:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous replication: status of standby side, Bruce Momjian, 00:09
June 03, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Bruce Momjian, 23:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 22:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving the ngettext() patch, Sergey Burladyan, 21:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 21:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Robert Haas, 21:07
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Jeremy Kerr, 19:44
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L'), Hiroshi Inoue, 19:41
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 19:40
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Bruce Momjian, 19:35
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Dave Page, 19:10
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, "Kevin Grittner", 19:02
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 18:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 18:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 18:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Emmanuel Cecchet, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Oleg Bartunov, 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 18:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 17:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Greg Stark, 17:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 17:55
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 17:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Tom Lane, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Emmanuel Cecchet, 17:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 17:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 17:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres delays function returning large set of data, Pavel Stehule, 17:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Tom Lane, 17:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Alvaro Herrera, 17:01
- [HACKERS] Improving the ngettext() patch, Tom Lane, 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Emmanuel Cecchet, 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, "Kevin Grittner", 16:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Robert Haas, 16:18
- Re: [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Zdenek Kotala, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Aidan Van Dyk, 15:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Ron Mayer, 15:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 15:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, "Kevin Grittner", 15:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Gregory Stark, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L'), Tom Lane, 14:06
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Magnus Hagander, 13:59
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 13:54
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 13:46
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 13:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 13:30
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator status for 8.4, Tom Lane, 13:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 13:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Magnus Hagander, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 13:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, "Kevin Grittner", 13:05
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator status for 8.4, Alvaro Herrera, 13:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 12:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 12:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 12:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Gevik Babakhani, 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 12:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 12:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 12:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Tom Lane, 12:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Dave Page, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Dave Page, 12:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 12:01
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Tom Lane, 11:52
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 11:52
- [HACKERS] Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset, Andres Freund, 11:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Tom Lane, 11:40
- [HACKERS] Postgres delays function returning large set of data, flippo00110001, 11:38
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 11:28
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 11:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Dave Page, 11:17
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 11:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 11:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Warnings in compile, Bruce Momjian, 10:48
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Ron Mayer, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] display previous query string of idle-in-transaction, "Kevin Grittner", 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow vacuumdb to only analyze, Bruce Momjian, 10:27
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 10:26
- Re: [HACKERS] display previous query string of idle-in-transaction, Greg Stark, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 10:20
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Magnus Hagander, 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 10:17
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Magnus Hagander, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Greg Stark, 10:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Tom Lane, 09:37
- [HACKERS] pg_migrator status for 8.4, Bruce Momjian, 09:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Emmanuel Cecchet, 09:15
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Andres Freund, 08:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 08:17
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Greg Stark, 08:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Florian Weimer, 07:48
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Florian Weimer, 07:34
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Jeremy Kerr, 07:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Gevik Babakhani, 06:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Greg Stark, 06:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Gevik Babakhani, 06:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Greg Stark, 05:57
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Florian Weimer, 05:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 05:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Question about STRICT, Greg Stark, 05:36
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Magnus Hagander, 05:12
- Re: [HACKERS] A humble request, Gevik Babakhani, 04:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "Markus Wanner", 04:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 02:20
- Re: [HACKERS] A humble request, Josh Berkus, 00:44
June 02, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 22:00
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 21:59
- Re: [HACKERS] A humble request, Bruce Momjian, 21:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Mark Mielke, 21:46
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Sushant Sinha, 21:29
- Re: [HACKERS] pull raw text of a message by message-id, Bruce Momjian, 20:58
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, "David E. Wheeler", 20:57
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Robert Haas, 20:55
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Andrew Dunstan, 20:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Stephen Frost, 20:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 20:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Aidan Van Dyk, 20:31
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Josh Berkus, 20:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 20:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 19:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Stephen Frost, 19:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 19:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 19:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 19:44
- [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add bit operations util header, Jeremy Kerr, 19:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 19:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 19:13
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment, Joe Conway, 19:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 19:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 19:04
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 19:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 18:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 18:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 18:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 18:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 18:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Greg Stark, 18:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 18:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 18:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 17:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 17:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 17:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Ron Mayer, 17:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 17:24
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 17:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 17:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 17:01
- Re: [HACKERS] dot to be considered as a word delimiter?, Kenneth Marshall, 16:57
- Re: [HACKERS] dot to be considered as a word delimiter?, "Kevin Grittner", 16:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 16:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 16:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Tom Lane, 16:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 16:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 16:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 16:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Robert Haas, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 16:09
- [HACKERS] Locks on temp table and PREPARE, Emmanuel Cecchet, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 16:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 15:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 15:38
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 14:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix LOCK TABLE to eliminate the race condition that could make it, Bruce Momjian, 14:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 14:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andrew Dunstan, 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Aidan Van Dyk, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold, Tom Lane, 13:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:37
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Marko Kreen, 13:26
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 13:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Aidan Van Dyk, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Ron Mayer, 13:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 13:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Marko Kreen, 12:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Mark Mielke, 12:43
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5, Bruce Momjian, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 12:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Andres Freund, 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Marko Kreen, 12:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Greg Stark, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Ron Mayer, 12:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Dave Page, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Aidan Van Dyk, 12:23
- apartamentos imoveis casas de 3 quartos em Jardim Camburi, apartamento 3 quartos jardim camburi, 12:19
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Alvaro Herrera, 12:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Simon Riggs, 12:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/2] Add bit operations util header, Tom Lane, 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, "David E. Wheeler", 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Robert Haas, 11:44
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 2/2] Use fls() to find chunk set, Jeremy Kerr, 11:44
- [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/2] Add bit operations util header, Jeremy Kerr, 11:44
- [HACKERS] Managing multiple branches in git, Tom Lane, 11:43
- Re: [HACKERS] faster version of AllocSetFreeIndex for x86 architecture, Jeremy Kerr, 11:39
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Greg Stark, 11:19
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 11:19
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and making columns invisible, Bruce Momjian, 11:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 11:15
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Alvaro Herrera, 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 11:02
- Re: [HACKERS] explain analyze rows=%.0f, Robert Haas, 10:56
- [HACKERS] faster version of AllocSetFreeIndex for x86 architecture, Atsushi Ogawa, 10:53
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 10:50
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Tom Lane, 10:45
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Marko Kreen, 10:43
- Re: [HACKERS] explain analyze rows=%.0f, Tom Lane, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Jeremy Kerr, 10:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and making columns invisible, Tom Lane, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Tom Lane, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Marko Kreen, 10:16
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Tom Lane, 10:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and making columns invisible, Bruce Momjian, 10:07
- Re: [HACKERS] explain analyze rows=%.0f, Robert Haas, 10:06
- [HACKERS] pg_migrator and making columns invisible, Bruce Momjian, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Marko Kreen, 09:53
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Jeremy Kerr, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] explain analyze rows=%.0f, Simon Riggs, 09:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tom Lane, 09:40
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 09:37
- Re: [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Tom Lane, 09:31
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 09:31
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Aidan Van Dyk, 08:48
- Re: [HACKERS] dot to be considered as a word delimiter?, Kenneth Marshall, 08:47
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 08:46
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 07:50
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 07:48
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 07:25
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 07:24
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, "Markus Wanner", 07:08
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Dimitri Fontaine, 04:37
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Markus Wanner", 03:17
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 03:13
- [HACKERS] 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error, Tatsuo Ishii, 02:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 02:45
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Marko Kreen, 02:43
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:40
- Ищу работу бухгалтером, Потапенко Владимир, 02:07
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Kris Jurka, 01:09
June 01, 2009
- [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] Only disable sigpipe during SSL write, Jeremy Kerr, 23:52
- [HACKERS] [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections, Jeremy Kerr, 23:52
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Robert Haas, 23:50
- Re: [HACKERS] from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold, Robert Haas, 23:46
- Re: [HACKERS] explain analyze rows=%.0f, Ron Mayer, 23:30
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment, Joe Conway, 23:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L'), Hiroshi Inoue, 23:22
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 22:39
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 21:40
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 21:30
- Re: [HACKERS] dot to be considered as a word delimiter?, "Kevin Grittner", 21:22
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 21:21
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment, Tom Lane, 21:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 21:14
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment, Tom Lane, 21:09
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 21:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Tom Lane, 20:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Robert Haas, 20:39
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 20:39
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 20:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Tom Lane, 20:04
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 19:46
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, "Kevin Grittner", 19:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Tom Lane, 18:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Tom Lane, 18:39
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 18:32
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 18:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Josh Berkus, 18:10
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 18:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Jeff Davis, 17:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Josh Berkus, 17:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Guillaume Smet, 17:39
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Jeff Davis, 17:26
- [HACKERS] Re: Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Greg Stark, 17:17
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 17:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Jeff Davis, 16:49
- Re: [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Zdenek Kotala, 16:45
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 16:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Tom Lane, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Zdenek Kotala, 16:27
- [HACKERS] Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild, Josh Berkus, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 16:24
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 16:23
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Robert Haas, 16:17
- Re: [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Tom Lane, 16:09
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Magnus Hagander, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Robert Haas, 16:03
- [HACKERS] list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris, Zdenek Kotala, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 15:55
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Robert Haas, 15:52
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Robert Haas, 15:46
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 15:44
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Robert Haas, 15:44
- Re: [HACKERS] from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold, Selena Deckelmann, 15:34
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Sam Mason, 15:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 15:18
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Greg Stark, 15:05
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path vs extensions, Alvaro Herrera, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Heikki Linnakangas, 15:03
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Alvaro Herrera, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 14:57
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 14:46
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Alvaro Herrera, 14:35
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Josh Berkus, 14:24
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 14:17
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:17
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 14:14
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Tom Lane, 14:12
- Re: [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Josh Berkus, 14:09
- Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up, Tom Lane, 14:08
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Greg Stark, 13:55
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 13:45
- Re: [HACKERS] User-facing aspects of serializable transactions, Markus Wanner, 13:27
- Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP, Kevin Field, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Dtrace probes documentation, Frank Ch. Eigler, 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Josh Berkus, 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Feedback on writing extensible modules, Simon Riggs, 12:41
- [HACKERS] It's June 1; do you know where your release is?, Tom Lane, 12:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Feedback on writing extensible modules, Alvaro Herrera, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Bruce Momjian, 12:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Bruce Momjian, 12:02
- Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP, Kevin Field, 12:01
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Robert Haas, 11:39
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Robert Haas, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Aidan Van Dyk, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Tom Lane, 11:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Greg Stark, 11:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Tom Lane, 11:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Robert Haas, 11:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:55
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Tom Lane, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] INTERVAL SECOND limited to 59 seconds?, Sebastien FLAESCH, 08:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Sam Mason, 05:19
- [HACKERS] pg_standby -l might destory the archived file, Fujii Masao, 01:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 00:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 00:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Tom Lane, 00:02
May 31, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 23:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Tom Lane, 23:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 23:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Tom Lane, 23:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Bruce Momjian, 23:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 23:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Tom Lane, 23:37
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type, Robert Haas, 23:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Itagaki Takahiro, 23:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 23:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Tom Lane, 23:08
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Tom Lane, 23:06
- Re: [HACKERS] information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB, Robert Haas, 22:57
- [HACKERS] Win32 link() function, Bruce Momjian, 22:53
- Re: [HACKERS] dblink patches for comment, Joe Conway, 20:27
- [HACKERS] survey of table blocksize changes, Mark Wong, 20:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] INTERVAL data type and libpq - what format?, Tom Lane, 20:05
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, "David E. Wheeler", 19:52
- Re: [HACKERS] search_path improvements, Greg Stark, 18:47
- [HACKERS] Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data, Tom Lane, 18:32
Privacy Policy