pgsql.hackers (date)
January 31, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] foreign_data test fails with non-C locale, Andrew Dunstan, 17:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Robert Haas, 16:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 15:41
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 15:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, Marko Kreen, 15:32
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:44
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 12:42
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 12:33
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Andrew Dunstan, 12:30
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, David Fetter, 12:28
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 12:24
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 12:23
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, David Fetter, 12:22
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Gregory Stark, 12:17
- Re: [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Robert Haas, 11:55
- [HACKERS] adding stuff to parser, question, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz, 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 10:46
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, "Hiroshi Saito", 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Martijn van Oosterhout, 10:44
- Re: [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, "Hiroshi Saito", 10:39
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 10:34
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 10:28
- [HACKERS] expected collation and ctype on windows?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, Magnus Hagander, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, "Hiroshi Saito", 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 09:22
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 09:17
- Re: [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, Magnus Hagander, 09:15
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 09:09
- [HACKERS] pgevent warnings on mingw, Andrew Dunstan, 09:07
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 08:32
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 08:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Robert Haas, 07:57
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 07:20
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 05:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 04:57
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 04:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 04:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Simon Riggs, 04:21
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 03:22
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Tom Lane, 00:48
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 00:09
January 30, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 23:47
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 23:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 22:46
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 21:52
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 20:43
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 20:28
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 19:28
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 19:20
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 19:13
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Hiroshi Inoue, 19:00
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 18:13
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Andrew Dunstan, 18:06
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 18:00
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Josh Berkus, 17:43
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 17:38
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Josh Berkus, 17:37
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Ron Mayer, 17:30
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 17:19
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Josh Berkus, 17:02
- Re: [HACKERS] PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf, Bruce Momjian, 16:52
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 16:50
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 16:47
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 16:41
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Josh Berkus, 16:39
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 16:34
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 16:22
- Re: [HACKERS] array_map not SQL accessible?, Tom Lane, 16:08
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 15:58
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 15:55
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Tom Lane, 15:50
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 15:45
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 15:29
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Andrew Chernow, 15:29
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 15:25
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 15:12
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 15:12
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Alvaro Herrera, 14:50
- Re: [HACKERS] ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying, Alvaro Herrera, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying, Tom Lane, 14:39
- Re: [HACKERS] parallel restore, Tom Lane, 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying, Alvaro Herrera, 14:19
- Re: [HACKERS] ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying, Alvaro Herrera, 14:12
- [HACKERS] ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying, Alvaro Herrera, 14:06
- Re: [HACKERS] array_map not SQL accessible?, Alvaro Herrera, 13:56
- Re: [HACKERS] array_map not SQL accessible?, Alvaro Herrera, 13:35
- Re: [HACKERS] array_map not SQL accessible?, Tom Lane, 13:17
- Re: [HACKERS] Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()?, "David E. Wheeler", 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] How to learn all information on the user of a database?, Robert Haas, 13:09
- [HACKERS] array_map not SQL accessible?, Alvaro Herrera, 12:58
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 12:15
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Tom Lane, 12:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Bruce Momjian, 12:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:05
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] Psql List Languages, Fernando Ike, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Bruce Momjian, 11:57
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Gregory Stark, 11:56
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Bruce Momjian, 11:54
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Heikki Linnakangas, 11:46
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Tom Lane, 11:27
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 11:13
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 11:01
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Alvaro Herrera, 10:59
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Zdenek Kotala, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Bruce Momjian, 10:41
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] fflush, Andrew Dunstan, 09:48
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 09:20
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 07:48
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Sam Mason, 07:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch Replication - Synch rep 0114, Fujii Masao, 07:17
- How to learn all information on the user of a database?, mmf . stavelot, 07:16
- [HACKERS] Synch Replication - Synch rep 0114, smitap3, 06:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:25
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 06:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 06:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 05:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 05:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:33
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Zdenek Kotala, 03:24
- Re: [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 03:13
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 03:03
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Heikki Linnakangas, 01:16
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Greg Smith, 00:34
January 29, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Bruce Momjian, 23:57
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 21:49
- Re: [HACKERS] Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()?, Tom Lane, 20:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()?, David Fetter, 20:28
- Re: [HACKERS] Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()?, Tom Lane, 20:12
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Tom Lane, 20:03
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 17:28
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 16:36
- [HACKERS] Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:08
- [HACKERS] PQinitSSL broken in some use cases, Andrew Chernow, 15:11
- Re: [HACKERS] reloptions with a "namespace", Alvaro Herrera, 14:01
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Josh Berkus, 13:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:35
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), "Joshua D. Drake", 13:25
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Josh Berkus, 13:18
- Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest infrastructure, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 12:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest infrastructure, Gregory Stark, 12:49
- Re: [HACKERS] possible bug in cover density ranking?, Teodor Sigaev, 12:38
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 12:29
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 12:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:33
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 09:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 09:10
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 08:52
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Peter Eisentraut, 08:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Gregory Stark, 08:39
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 08:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 08:19
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 08:15
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 08:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 07:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 07:21
- Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest infrastructure, Gregory Stark, 06:08
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Gregory Stark, 05:58
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 05:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 05:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 05:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Greg Stark, 04:49
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 04:40
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Magnus Hagander, 04:38
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 04:37
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 04:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 03:08
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release =?iso-8859-1?q?=09planning?=), Magnus Hagander, 03:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:34
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 02:20
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 01:59
- Re: [HACKERS] V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4, Koichi Suzuki, 01:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 01:44
- [HACKERS] possible bug in cover density ranking?, Sushant Sinha, 01:07
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 00:46
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 00:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 00:31
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 00:29
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release =?iso-8859-1?q?=09planning?=), Bruce Momjian, 00:26
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release =?iso-8859-1?q?=09planning?=), "Marc G. Fournier", 00:24
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 00:19
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Bruce Momjian, 00:03
January 28, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 23:42
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release =?iso-8859-1?q?=09planning?=), Bruce Momjian, 23:35
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 23:33
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Bruce Momjian, 23:19
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 23:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Column-Level Privileges, Stephen Frost, 23:07
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 22:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Andrew Dunstan, 22:44
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 22:44
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 22:43
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 22:36
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 22:35
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 22:32
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Fujii Masao, 22:18
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 22:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 22:12
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 22:08
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 21:49
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 21:36
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 21:27
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 21:22
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 21:19
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 21:18
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 21:11
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 21:05
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 20:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 20:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Fujii Masao, 20:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 20:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 20:12
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 19:39
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 19:31
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 19:03
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Tom Lane, 18:57
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Andrew Dunstan, 18:46
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Tom Lane, 18:34
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Ron Mayer, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 18:19
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Gregory Stark, 18:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 18:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:49
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 17:47
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 17:45
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:44
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Output filter for psql, Andrew Dunstan, 17:40
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:39
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Ron Mayer, 17:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 17:25
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Ron Mayer, 17:23
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 17:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 17:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 17:17
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 17:11
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 17:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 17:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 17:00
- Re: [HACKERS] Column privileges for system catalogs, Stephen Frost, 16:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:22
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Tom Lane, 16:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Gregory Stark, 16:11
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:09
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Robert Haas, 15:58
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Tom Lane, 15:58
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 15:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Jeff Davis, 15:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Heikki Linnakangas, 15:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 15:39
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 15:35
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 15:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Output filter for psql, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain", 15:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Heikki Linnakangas, 15:19
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Jeff Davis, 15:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 15:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Greg Stark, 15:07
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Aidan Van Dyk, 15:05
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Greg Stark, 15:03
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Tom Lane, 14:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 14:49
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Andrew Sullivan, 14:43
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Heikki Linnakangas, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Tom Lane, 14:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), "Joshua D. Drake", 14:33
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 14:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Output filter for psql, Andrew Dunstan, 14:08
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 14:06
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Mark Cave-Ayland, 14:05
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Gregory Stark, 14:02
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Gregory Stark, 13:55
- Re: [HACKERS] Output filter for psql, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain", 13:51
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 13:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 13:28
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Tom Lane, 13:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 12:35
- [HACKERS] using composite types in insert/update, Merlin Moncure, 12:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 12:00
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 11:53
- Re: [HACKERS] Column privileges for system catalogs, Tom Lane, 11:35
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Tom Lane, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Joshua Brindle, 10:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 10:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 10:31
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 10:25
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32., Magnus Hagander, 10:24
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 10:20
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32., Tom Lane, 10:15
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 10:13
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Fujii Masao, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Column privileges for system catalogs, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 09:51
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 09:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 09:41
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 09:36
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Stephen Frost, 09:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Andrew Sullivan, 09:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Fujii Masao, 09:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Gregory Stark, 09:10
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Robert Haas, 09:02
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Magnus Hagander, 08:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Magnus Hagander, 08:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Magnus Hagander, 08:55
- Re: [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, KaiGai Kohei, 08:28
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32., Magnus Hagander, 08:22
- Re: [HACKERS] posix_fadvise v22, Gregory Stark, 07:56
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Simon Riggs, 07:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Stephen Frost, 06:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Index Scan cost expression, Gregory Stark, 06:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Magnus Hagander, 06:19
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Cédric Villemain, 05:48
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Magnus Hagander, 05:33
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 05:26
- [HACKERS] Column privileges for system catalogs, Peter Eisentraut, 05:21
- [HACKERS] How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable, Peter Eisentraut, 05:18
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infra, Heikki Linnakangas, 05:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 04:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 04:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Richard Huxton, 03:59
- Re: [HACKERS] log_duration_sample config option patch, Timo Savola, 03:49
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:24
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Peter Eisentraut, 01:24
- Re: [HACKERS] [OT] there is a way to extract a previously applied patch?, Peter Eisentraut, 01:22
- Re: [HACKERS] [OT] there is a way to extract a previously applied patch?, Andrew Dunstan, 00:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 00:18
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 00:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Greg Smith, 00:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [OT] there is a way to extract a previously applied patch?, Jaime Casanova, 00:13
- Re: [HACKERS] [OT] there is a way to extract a previously applied patch?, Robert Haas, 00:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 00:02
January 27, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 23:44
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 23:41
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 23:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Greg Smith, 23:17
- [HACKERS] [OT] there is a way to extract a previously applied patch?, Jaime Casanova, 23:14
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 23:08
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Jaime Casanova, 22:48
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 22:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 22:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 22:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 21:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 21:55
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 21:41
- Re: [HACKERS] log_duration_sample config option patch, Euler Taveira de Oliveira, 21:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 21:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 21:16
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 21:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Chad Sellers, 20:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 20:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 20:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 20:32
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 20:24
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 19:04
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Greg Smith, 18:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 18:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 18:01
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby (v9d), Simon Riggs, 17:52
- Re: [HACKERS] Table Inheritance and dropped columns, Tom Lane, 17:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Chad Sellers, 17:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Josh Berkus, 17:15
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 17:11
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Magnus Hagander, 16:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Treat, 16:49
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 16:40
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 16:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Martijn van Oosterhout, 16:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 16:28
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 16:27
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 16:26
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Jaime Casanova, 16:23
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 16:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 16:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 16:10
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 16:09
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Jeff Davis, 16:08
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Marko Kreen, 16:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 16:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Greg Smith, 16:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 16:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 16:02
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 16:00
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 15:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 15:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Peter Eisentraut, 15:54
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 15:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 15:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 15:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 15:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 15:47
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 15:46
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 15:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 15:36
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Tom Lane, 15:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 15:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 15:32
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 15:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 15:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 15:31
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Peter Eisentraut, 15:28
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Peter Eisentraut, 15:24
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 15:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 15:12
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Josh Berkus, 15:11
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Tom Lane, 15:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 15:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 15:04
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 15:03
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 15:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 15:00
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 15:00
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 14:55
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 14:52
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 14:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 14:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 14:47
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 14:46
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 14:46
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Alvaro Herrera, 14:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 14:41
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Robert Haas, 14:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 14:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:37
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 14:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 14:33
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 14:32
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 14:31
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 14:29
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 14:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 14:15
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:13
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 14:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 14:05
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 14:04
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Tom Lane, 13:58
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 13:57
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Josh Berkus, 13:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 13:52
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Josh Berkus, 13:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 13:50
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Jeff Davis, 13:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 13:49
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Tom Lane, 13:47
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:46
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Josh Berkus, 13:45
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 13:44
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Simon Riggs, 13:42
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 13:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Josh Berkus, 13:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Andrew Sullivan, 13:15
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Heikki Linnakangas, 13:11
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 12:52
- Re: [HACKERS] gin fast insert performance, Jeff Davis, 12:50
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Simon Riggs, 12:48
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Simon Riggs, 12:45
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Tom Lane, 12:43
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 12:41
- Re: [HACKERS] gin fast insert performance, Teodor Sigaev, 12:40
- Re: [HACKERS] gin fast insert performance, Teodor Sigaev, 12:36
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 12:30
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Tom Lane, 12:20
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 12:18
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 12:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Gregory Stark, 12:10
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Tom Lane, 12:07
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, David Fetter, 12:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Gregory Stark, 11:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 11:56
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), "Joshua D. Drake", 11:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 11:50
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 11:49
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Heikki Linnakangas, 11:46
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 11:45
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Peter Eisentraut, 11:42
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:37
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), "Joshua D. Drake", 11:36
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 11:36
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Tom Lane, 11:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 11:31
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] More FOR UPDATE/FOR SHARE problems, "Kevin Grittner", 11:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 11:26
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Kenneth Marshall, 11:25
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Tom Lane, 11:23
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 11:21
- Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] updated hash functions for postgresql v1, Kenneth Marshall, 11:20
- Re: [HACKERS] More FOR UPDATE/FOR SHARE problems, Gregory Stark, 11:16
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:04
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), "Joshua D. Drake", 11:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 10:58
- Re: [HACKERS] More FOR UPDATE/FOR SHARE problems, "Kevin Grittner", 10:57
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Andrew Dunstan, 10:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, "Joshua D. Drake", 10:52
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 10:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Heikki Linnakangas, 10:50
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), "Joshua D. Drake", 10:48
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 10:47
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Andrew Dunstan, 10:45
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Tom Lane, 10:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Dave Page, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, David Fetter, 10:38
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 10:37
- Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery, Tom Lane, 10:37
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Andrew Dunstan, 10:35
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 10:34
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Robert Haas, 10:33
- Re: [HACKERS] binary array and record recv, Alvaro Herrera, 10:30
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Andrew Dunstan, 10:30
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Brendan Jurd, 10:29
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Kaare Rasmussen, 10:27
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Magnus Hagander, 10:25
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Harald Armin Massa, 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] binary array and record recv, Tom Lane, 10:23
- Re: [HACKERS] Index Scan cost expression, Gregory Stark, 10:22
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 10:20
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Tom Lane, 10:19
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Robert Haas, 10:18
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 10:14
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Andrew Dunstan, 10:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 10:12
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Tom Lane, 10:11
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Stephen Frost, 10:08
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Robert Haas, 10:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Simon Riggs, 10:06
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Stephen Frost, 10:05
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 09:56
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Magnus Hagander, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] Index Scan cost expression, Tom Lane, 09:54
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Tom Lane, 09:52
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Alvaro Herrera, 09:49
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Sam Mason, 09:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Andrew Dunstan, 09:48
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Merlin Moncure, 09:47
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Alvaro Herrera, 09:47
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Ron Mayer, 09:45
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Robert Haas, 09:45
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Kenneth Marshall, 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Dave Page, 09:44
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Alvaro Herrera, 09:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 09:36
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:35
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 09:35
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Robert Haas, 09:35
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Andrew Dunstan, 09:30
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Magnus Hagander, 09:24
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Ron Mayer, 09:20
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Dave Page, 09:10
- Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 09:04
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Zdenek Kotala, 09:02
- Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules), Peter Eisentraut, 09:01
- [HACKERS] Hot standby, recovery infrastructure, Heikki Linnakangas, 08:59
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Marko Kreen, 08:51
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Magnus Hagander, 08:50
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Bernd Helmle, 08:49
- Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Dave Page, 08:47
- [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project status, Zdenek Kotala, 08:44
- Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning), Alvaro Herrera, 08:42
- [HACKERS] log_duration_sample config option patch, Timo Savola, 08:41
- [HACKERS] Index Scan cost expression, Amit Gupta, 08:39
- Re: [HACKERS] mingw check hung, Magnus Hagander, 08:15
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Peter Eisentraut, 08:13
- Re: [HACKERS] binary array and record recv, Peter Eisentraut, 07:51
- Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warnings fix, Magnus Hagander, 07:47
- [HACKERS] log_duration_sample config option patch, Timo Savola, 07:30
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 07:18
- Re: [HACKERS] binary array and record recv, Peter Eisentraut, 07:07
- [HACKERS] [PATCH] Space reservation v02, Zdenek Kotala, 07:06
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Peter Eisentraut, 07:05
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Peter Eisentraut, 07:04
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Peter Eisentraut, 06:59
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Dave Page, 06:45
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Dave Page, 06:40
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Magnus Hagander, 06:38
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Peter Eisentraut, 06:26
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 06:10
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Dave Page, 06:06
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:04
- [HACKERS] Patch to add Windows 7 support, Dave Page, 05:34
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Rick Gigger, 05:33
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Bernd Helmle, 05:31
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Mark Kirkwood, 04:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Simon Riggs, 04:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Dave Page, 03:49
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 01:41
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 01:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 01:19
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Heikki Linnakangas, 01:15
- [HACKERS] Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp), Brendan Jurd, 01:09
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Pavel Stehule, 01:05
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Jaime Casanova, 00:58
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 00:49
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Pavel Stehule, 00:40
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 00:38
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Josh Berkus, 00:36
- Re: [HACKERS] SE-PostgreSQL Updated Revision (r1460), Robert Haas, 00:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Robert Haas, 00:06
January 26, 2009
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 23:59
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 23:39
- [HACKERS] Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp), Brendan Jurd, 23:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Josh Berkus, 23:16
- Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warnings fix, Tom Lane, 23:14
- Re: [HACKERS] Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp), Tom Lane, 23:05
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Josh Berkus, 23:03
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 23:02
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 22:55
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 22:54
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Dann Corbit", 22:49
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, "Joshua D. Drake", 22:42
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Jaime Casanova, 22:39
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 22:30
- Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warnings fix, Andrew Dunstan, 22:14
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Bruce Momjian, 22:13
- [HACKERS] Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp), Brendan Jurd, 21:26
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Stephen Frost, 21:25
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 21:17
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, KaiGai Kohei, 21:12
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Tom Lane, 21:02
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle, Josh Berkus, 20:47
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning, Joshua Brindle, 20:45
- Welcome to the pgsql-hackers list!, pgsql-hackers-owner, 20:43
January 07, 2009
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), KaiGai Kohei, 21:55
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:54
- Re: text search patch status update?, Bruce Momjian, 21:49
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), Alvaro Herrera, 21:44
- Re: text search patch status update?, Sushant Sinha, 21:42
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Stephen Frost, 21:13
- Re: text search patch status update?, Bruce Momjian, 20:50
- Re: Potential Join Performance Issue, Bruce Momjian, 20:42
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), KaiGai Kohei, 20:26
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, KaiGai Kohei, 19:58
- Re: parallel restore, Tom Lane, 19:25
- Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal, Bruce Momjian, 19:24
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), Tom Lane, 19:16
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Bruce Momjian, 19:15
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), Alvaro Herrera, 19:04
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 18:58
- Re: reloptions and toast tables, Alvaro Herrera, 18:50
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 18:46
- Re: parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 18:37
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Bruce Momjian, 18:33
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Simon Riggs, 18:24
- Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql, Bruce Momjian, 18:24
- Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql, Tom Lane, 18:12
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 17:56
- Re: Significant oversight in that #include-removal script, Bruce Momjian, 17:56
- Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain", 17:49
- Re: Significant oversight in that #include-removal script, Tom Lane, 17:49
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Tom Lane, 17:46
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Greg Smith, 17:28
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Bruce Momjian, 17:24
- Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql, Bruce Momjian, 17:22
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Stephen Frost, 17:14
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 17:08
- Re: Significant oversight in that #include-removal script, Alvaro Herrera, 17:07
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, Hiroshi Inoue, 17:03
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Heikki Linnakangas, 16:56
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Bruce Momjian, 16:48
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., Hiroshi Inoue, 16:47
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 16:41
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Dimitri Fontaine, 16:40
- Re: Significant oversight in that #include-removal script, Bruce Momjian, 16:31
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, Magnus Hagander, 16:26
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Bruce Momjian, 16:24
- Significant oversight in that #include-removal script, Tom Lane, 16:24
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Simon Riggs, 16:21
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, Hiroshi Inoue, 16:19
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 15:20
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Bruce Momjian, 14:53
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Stephen Frost, 13:57
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Josh Berkus, 13:40
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Tom Lane, 13:36
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Josh Berkus, 13:32
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Stephen Frost, 13:15
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, "Robert Haas", 12:59
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Bruce Momjian, 12:58
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Tom Lane, 12:54
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:35
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, "Robert Haas", 12:26
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Tom Lane, 12:19
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, Bruce Momjian, 12:14
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:56
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, Greg Stark, 11:53
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., "Hiroshi Saito", 11:44
- Re: float8 strtod weirdness, Tom Lane, 11:44
- Re: about truncate, David Fetter, 11:37
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., Hiroshi Inoue, 11:37
- Re: float8 strtod weirdness, Sam Mason, 11:21
- Re: about truncate, Tom Lane, 11:17
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, Hiroshi Inoue, 11:04
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Tom Lane, 10:59
- Re: about truncate, Peter Eisentraut, 10:48
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 10:45
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 10:44
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 10:40
- Re: float8 strtod weirdness, Kenneth Marshall, 10:31
- Re: float8 strtod weirdness, David Fetter, 09:57
- Re: float8 strtod weirdness, Tom Lane, 09:56
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, Bruce Momjian, 09:47
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Gregory Maxwell", 09:44
- Re: reducing statistics write overhead, Tom Lane, 09:44
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Stephen Frost, 09:16
- Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets, Joshua Tolley, 09:14
- Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32, Magnus Hagander, 08:56
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, Magnus Hagander, 08:55
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), Tom Lane, 08:54
- Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32, Andrew Dunstan, 08:52
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), Alvaro Herrera, 08:45
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Heikki Linnakangas, 08:43
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Stephen Frost, 08:39
- Re: error code 25001, Tom Lane, 08:30
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., Magnus Hagander, 08:25
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., Alvaro Herrera, 08:22
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Peter Eisentraut, 08:17
- error code 25001, Tatsuo Ishii, 08:11
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Peter Eisentraut, 08:04
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Peter Eisentraut, 07:41
- Re: Including kerberos realm, Magnus Hagander, 07:39
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 07:23
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 07:07
- Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, "Robert Haas", 07:04
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Heikki Linnakangas, 06:18
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Zdenek Kotala, 06:08
- Re: hist boundary duplicates bug in head and 8.3, "Nathan Boley", 06:03
- Re: hist boundary duplicates bug in head and 8.3, Simon Riggs, 05:39
- Re: reducing statistics write overhead, Martin Pihlak, 05:36
- Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32, Magnus Hagander, 05:11
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 04:54
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Peter Eisentraut, 04:45
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:35
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, KaiGai Kohei, 04:27
- Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts, Peter Eisentraut, 04:26
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Markus Wanner, 04:18
- Re: SQL/MED dummy vs postgresql wrapper, Martin Pihlak, 03:32
- Re: Visibility map and freezing, Jeff Davis, 03:21
- Re: Visibility map and freezing, Heikki Linnakangas, 02:34
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Greg Smith, 01:46
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, KaiGai Kohei, 01:46
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, "Fujii Masao", 01:42
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, Heikki Linnakangas, 01:12
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, "Pavan Deolasee", 00:41
- Do we still need constraint_exclusion?, Bruce Momjian, 00:15
- Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows., ITAGAKI Takahiro, 00:09
January 06, 2009
- Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets, "Robert Haas", 23:49
- Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1, Bruce Momjian, 23:47
- Re: Regexps vs. locale, Bruce Momjian, 23:44
- Re: log output of vxid, Bruce Momjian, 23:25
- Re: parallel restore, "Jaime Casanova", 22:56
- Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32, Bruce Momjian, 22:39
- Unicode support in postgresql code, Kalyankumar Ramaseshan, 22:31
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 22:29
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, KaiGai Kohei, 21:43
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Alvaro Herrera, 21:13
- Re: SQL/MED dummy vs postgresql wrapper, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:08
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 20:51
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Alvaro Herrera, 20:36
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 20:26
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), "Joshua D. Drake", 20:14
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, KaiGai Kohei, 19:58
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Alvaro Herrera, 19:58
- Re: Runaway backend at 100% CPU PostgreSQL v8.3.5, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 19:33
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), "Joshua D. Drake", 19:18
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 19:13
- Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets, "Bryce Cutt", 19:12
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), "Joshua D. Drake", 19:08
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 19:06
- Re: Runaway backend at 100% CPU PostgreSQL v8.3.5, Tom Lane, 18:50
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: This makes all the \dX commands (most importantly to most: \df), Bruce Momjian, 18:22
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Tom Lane, 16:40
- Re: parallel restore, Tom Lane, 16:32
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Tom Lane, 16:25
- Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch, Bruce Momjian, 16:11
- Re: parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 16:10
- Re: parallel restore, "Jaime Casanova", 16:06
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 16:04
- Re: parallel restore, "Jaime Casanova", 16:04
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Alvaro Herrera, 16:03
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Tom Lane, 15:44
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Paul Schlie, 15:32
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 15:30
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Joe Conway, 15:00
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 14:57
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 14:53
- Re: stat() vs cygwin, Bruce Momjian, 14:41
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Tom Lane, 14:20
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Tom Lane, 14:06
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Alvaro Herrera, 14:05
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Martin Pihlak, 14:04
- Re: PostgreSQL 8.3.4 reproducible crash, Bruce Momjian, 14:02
- Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Bruce Momjian, 13:56
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Martin Pihlak, 13:48
- Re: SPI nesting in plperl, Tom Lane, 13:46
- Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?, Tom Lane, 13:40
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Magnus Hagander, 13:38
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Tom Lane, 13:31
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Peter Eisentraut, 13:25
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Peter Eisentraut, 13:10
- Re: pg_restore --clean text, Bruce Momjian, 13:02
- SQL/MED dummy vs postgresql wrapper, Peter Eisentraut, 13:00
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 12:57
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Tom Lane, 12:50
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Peter Eisentraut, 12:45
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Peter Eisentraut, 12:41
- Re: pg_restore --clean text, Tom Lane, 12:39
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, "Robert Haas", 12:38
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Simon Riggs, 12:30
- Re: [PATCH] ALTER TABLE SET (compress_max_size... = ), "Alex Hunsaker", 12:20
- Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 12:19
- Re: pg_restore --clean text, Bruce Momjian, 12:18
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, "Kevin Grittner", 12:16
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:50
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:49
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, "Robert Haas", 11:46
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work, "Hiroshi Saito", 11:35
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 11:33
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:30
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:29
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Simon Riggs, 11:20
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, "Dave Page", 11:17
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:12
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, "Dave Page", 11:10
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 11:06
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Alvaro Herrera, 10:56
- Re: Warning about the 8.4 release, Bruce Momjian, 10:51
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Heikki Linnakangas, 10:16
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Alvaro Herrera, 10:11
- Hot Standby Query Conflicts, Simon Riggs, 10:01
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Robert Haas", 09:57
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 09:18
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), KaiGai Kohei, 08:28
- Re: [GENERAL] ERROR: failed to find conversion function from "unknown" to text, Tom Lane, 08:01
- Re: Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta, Simon Riggs, 05:38
- Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389), KaiGai Kohei, 03:08
- Re: ERROR: failed to find conversion function from "unknown" to text, "Pavel Stehule", 01:30
January 05, 2009
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Tom Lane, 23:58
- Re: Segfault on CVS HEAD, Tom Lane, 19:16
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 18:11
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Mark Mielke, 17:41
- Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager, Martin Pihlak, 16:42
- Re: EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders is too quiet, Tom Lane, 16:31
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Joshua D. Drake", 16:02
- Re: Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta, Simon Riggs, 15:48
- Re: an idea, language SPI, "Pavel Stehule", 15:35
- Re: Filtering WAL records in recovery, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:23
- Re: an idea, language SPI, Tom Lane, 15:14
- Re: Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta, Bruce Momjian, 15:05
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Robert Haas", 14:55
- Re: EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders is too quiet, Tom Lane, 14:31
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386), Tom Lane, 14:27
- Filtering WAL records in recovery, Simon Riggs, 14:27
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Holger Hoffstaette", 14:17
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Tom Lane, 14:05
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Gregory Stark, 14:02
- an idea, language SPI, "Pavel Stehule", 13:45
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Andrew Chernow, 13:44
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "A.M.", 13:35
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 13:21
- Re: Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta, Simon Riggs, 13:18
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Tom Lane, 13:17
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 13:16
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Tom Lane, 13:07
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Robert Haas", 13:04
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 12:43
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Andrew Dunstan, 12:40
- Re: pg_dump roles support, Tom Lane, 11:55
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Merlin Moncure", 11:55
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386), Bruce Momjian, 11:52
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Alvaro Herrera, 11:45
- Re: EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders is too quiet, Bruce Momjian, 11:34
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Douglas McNaught", 11:30
- Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386), "Robert Haas", 11:06
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Merlin Moncure", 10:57
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Bruce Momjian, 10:41
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, "Kevin Grittner", 09:51
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Martin Pihlak, 09:30
- Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken, Aidan Van Dyk, 08:59
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 08:57
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Peter Eisentraut, 08:48
- Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager, Peter Eisentraut, 08:32
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Zdenek Kotala, 07:33
- Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits, Zdenek Kotala, 07:29
- Re: Many "loaded library" logs by preload libraries, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 05:20
- Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386), KaiGai Kohei, 04:44
- Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22, Peter Eisentraut, 03:42
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 03:18
- log output of vxid, "Fujii Masao", 03:06
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Peter Eisentraut, 02:38
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Gregory Stark, 01:06
January 04, 2009
- Re: Many "loaded library" logs by preload libraries, Tom Lane, 22:05
- SPI nesting in plperl, Tom Lane, 21:56
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:52
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, KaiGai Kohei, 21:42
- Re: Export IsUnderPostmaster for pg_stat_statements on win32, Alvaro Herrera, 21:28
- Re: PROPOSAL: geqo improvement, "marcin mank", 21:26
- Many "loaded library" logs by preload libraries, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:06
- Re: PROPOSAL: geqo improvement, "Robert Haas", 21:06
- PROPOSAL: geqo improvement, "marcin mank", 20:55
- Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), Alvaro Herrera, 20:51
- Export IsUnderPostmaster for pg_stat_statements on win32, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 20:50
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 20:46
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 20:40
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 20:34
- QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 20:30
- Re: WIP patch for basic window frame support, "Hitoshi Harada", 19:52
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, KaiGai Kohei, 19:44
- Re: WIP patch for basic window frame support, Tom Lane, 19:34
- Re: WIP patch for basic window frame support, "Hitoshi Harada", 19:16
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Tom Lane, 18:37
- [PATCH] ALTER TABLE SET (compress_max_size... = ), "Alex Hunsaker", 18:32
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, "Alex Hunsaker", 18:10
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, James Mansion, 17:42
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Tom Lane, 17:41
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 17:01
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Tom Lane, 16:57
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 16:36
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 16:31
- dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details, Joe Conway, 15:34
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED, Martin Pihlak, 15:13
- Re: parallel restore, Alvaro Herrera, 13:11
- Re: pg_stats queries versus per-database encodings, Tom Lane, 13:01
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Tom Lane, 12:49
- Re: parallel restore, Simon Riggs, 12:44
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Markus Wanner, 12:29
- Re: parallel restore, Andrew Dunstan, 12:28
- Re: parallel restore, Tom Lane, 12:14
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Greg Stark, 11:40
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Stephen Frost, 11:18
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:59
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Heikki Linnakangas, 09:38
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Simon Riggs, 09:22
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Markus Wanner, 09:14
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 07:48
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Heikki Linnakangas, 06:01
- Re: pg_stats queries versus per-database encodings, Heikki Linnakangas, 05:49
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Simon Riggs, 04:21
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Mark Kirkwood, 04:18
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Mark Kirkwood, 04:13
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Simon Riggs, 04:11
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby, Mark Kirkwood, 03:03
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 00:15
January 03, 2009
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Philip Warner, 23:56
- ecm2001 winols shoemaster wilcom bentley amiable 424553052120214, ecm2001 winols shoemaster bentley, 23:33
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 23:29
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 23:01
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Philip Warner, 22:47
- Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta, Bruce Momjian, 22:34
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Peter Eisentraut, 18:37
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Peter Eisentraut, 17:56
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Gregory Stark, 17:53
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Peter Eisentraut, 17:45
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED, Joe Conway, 17:31
- Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?, Peter Eisentraut, 17:29
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Peter Eisentraut, 17:20
- Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions, Peter Eisentraut, 17:06
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Peter Eisentraut, 16:42
- Re: reloptions and toast tables, Magnus Hagander, 15:16
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module, Joe Conway, 15:00
- Re: reloptions and toast tables, Tom Lane, 11:44
- Re: Custom PGC_POSTMASTER GUC variables ... feasible?, Tom Lane, 11:37
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 11:32
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 11:26
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, KaiGai Kohei, 10:59
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Simon Riggs, 10:54
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module, Tom Lane, 10:26
- Re: reloptions and toast tables, Alvaro Herrera, 10:24
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 10:20
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Alvaro Herrera, 10:17
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, Simon Riggs, 08:46
- Re: generic reloptions improvement, KaiGai Kohei, 07:42
- Re: reloptions and toast tables, "Dave Page", 05:59
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 05:46
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Simon Riggs, 04:46
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 04:34
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 01:32
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 01:16
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Andrew Chernow, 00:17
January 02, 2009
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Robert Haas", 23:34
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Greg Stark", 23:26
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Gregory Stark, 23:15
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 23:13
- Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module, Joe Conway, 22:55
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 22:30
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Tom Lane, 22:20
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Greg Stark", 22:02
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Robert Haas", 21:37
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 21:27
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 20:46
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 20:42
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 20:36
- Re: Hashtable entry recycling algorithm in pg_stat_statements, "Alex Hunsaker", 20:34
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 20:30
- Re: Hashtable entry recycling algorithm in pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 20:23
- Re: Hashtable entry recycling algorithm in pg_stat_statements, "Alex Hunsaker", 20:20
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Tom Lane, 19:51
- Hashtable entry recycling algorithm in pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 19:22
- Re: Auto-updated fields, Alvaro Herrera, 19:14
- Re: New patch for Column-level privileges, Stephen Frost, 18:11
- Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken, Peter Eisentraut, 18:09
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Greg Stark", 18:02
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 17:48
- Re: dblink vs SQL/MED, Joe Conway, 17:39
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 17:36
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Robert Haas", 16:43
- Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken, Aidan Van Dyk, 16:33
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 16:19
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Gregory Stark, 15:59
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Bruce Momjian, 15:43
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Gregory Stark, 15:40
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Robert Haas", 15:35
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 15:23
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Tom Lane, 15:01
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, "Robert Haas", 14:58
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 14:50
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 14:42
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Greg Smith, 14:25
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, Simon Riggs, 14:20
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 13:56
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, Tom Lane, 13:47
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 13:44
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, "Kevin Grittner", 13:01
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Robert Haas", 12:44
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Simon Riggs, 12:35
- Custom PGC_POSTMASTER GUC variables ... feasible?, Tom Lane, 12:30
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, "Robert Haas", 12:23
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, Tom Lane, 11:01
- Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels, "Kevin Grittner", 10:38
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Tom Lane, 10:33
- Re: Including kerberos realm, Tom Lane, 10:20
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 09:57
- Re: pg_pltemplate entries for external PLs, Peter Eisentraut, 09:08
- Re: Including kerberos realm, Magnus Hagander, 08:34
- Re: Including kerberos realm, Alvaro Herrera, 08:32
- Including kerberos realm, Magnus Hagander, 07:23
- Overriding Kerberos parameters, Magnus Hagander, 07:21
- Re: benchmarking the query planner, Greg Smith, 06:17
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Greg Smith, 05:08
- Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch, Guillaume Lelarge, 05:02
- Re: Kerberos options requiring restart, Magnus Hagander, 04:52
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 01:09
- Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager, David Fetter, 00:57
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 00:44
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 00:12
January 01, 2009
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Greg Stark, 23:49
- Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 23:49
- Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?, "Alex Hunsaker", 23:30
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 23:11
- Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets, "Robert Haas", 23:03
- Re: Copyright update, Robert Treat, 23:00
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Greg Stark, 22:53
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, "Alex Hunsaker", 22:05
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Tom Lane, 21:59
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, "Alex Hunsaker", 21:45
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 21:43
- Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1226, Tom Lane, 19:28
- Re: Copyright update, Mark Mielke, 17:56
- Re: Enable pl/python to return records based on multiple OUT params, Tom Lane, 16:58
- Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager, Martin Pihlak, 16:10
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, Tom Lane, 15:55
- Re: posix_fadvise v22, "Robert Haas", 15:30
- Re: Copyright update, Bruce Momjian, 15:28
- Re: Copyright update, Tom Lane, 15:28
- Re: Copyright update, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:16
- Re: Copyright update, Bruce Momjian, 14:47
- Re: Copyright update, Andrew Chernow, 14:46
- Re: Copyright update, Bruce Momjian, 14:38
- Re: Copyright update, Greg Stark, 14:36
- Re: [patch] Reformat permissions in \l+ (like \z does), "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum", 14:30
- Re: Kerberos options requiring restart, Tom Lane, 14:09
- Copyright update, Bruce Momjian, 13:25
- Kerberos options requiring restart, Magnus Hagander, 12:58
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 12:57
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 12:54
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Simon Riggs, 12:16
- Re: TODO items for window functions, "Robert Haas", 08:42
- Re: TODO items for window functions, Dimitri Fontaine, 06:45
- Re: lazy_truncate_heap(), Heikki Linnakangas, 05:00
- Re: Buffer miss ratio, Heikki Linnakangas, 04:08
December 31, 2008
- Re: About CMake, James Mansion, 18:37
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, Tom Lane, 17:57
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, "Jaime Casanova", 17:26
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, "Pavel Stehule", 17:19
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, "Pavel Stehule", 17:13
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, Tom Lane, 17:06
- Re: sum() over (partition by order) question, "Pavel Stehule", 16:55
Privacy Policy