pgsql.hackers
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
<prev [Thread] next>

Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?

from ["Heikki Linnakangas"]
Subject: Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:05:38 +0300
Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers 


Tom Lane wrote:

I'll have a go at this later ... unless you want to do it?


Nah, I don't care enough.
BTW, it would be nice to have a test case that shows it's worth messing with that. 

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
                                www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: TODO <-> Commitfest, "Brendan Jurd"
Next by Date:  Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?, Peter Eisentraut
Previous by Thread:  Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?, Tom Lane
Next by Thread:  Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?, "Greg Stark"
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
Privacy Policy